Started By
Message

re: Tell me why Imperial is better than the Metric system

Posted on 10/23/24 at 8:58 am to
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
74927 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 8:58 am to
Because America, frick yes. I measure bodies of water by how many tea boxes can be thrown in them.
Posted by ImJustaBoy
Member since Oct 2023
1475 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 8:58 am to
Kilometer is too small, Liter is to small, reading a metric tape measure sucks, a cm isn’t big enough and a mm is too small, it’s all a blur. A kilogram is too heavy, And weather shouldn’t need decimal places for everyday usage like celsius.
Posted by KamaCausey_LSU
Member since Apr 2013
15988 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 9:01 am to
quote:

Right. Our system is intuitive, more so than Celsius. There are certain areas where volume or distance could be better served with the metric system, but I like our temp nomenclature as it is more intuitive.

Except it's not. Celsius is based around the melting point 0C and boiling point of water 100C.

Fahrenheit is based on the internal body temperature being 100F. And 0F is meaningless.

edit typo. Whoops. Autocorrect and swipe texts wins again.
This post was edited on 10/23/24 at 9:38 am
Posted by Nutriaitch
Montegut
Member since Apr 2008
9657 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 9:02 am to
quote:

Imperial is maddening, especially if you have to be more accurate than 1/16.



it's not hard to find a tape measure that has 32nds or even 64ths.


Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
43086 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 9:04 am to
quote:

I'll add that Fahrenheit is much easier for humans to relate to since our bodies are around 98deg F. We understand 100deg F better than whatever the Celsius math works out to.
so you’re saying a degF measurement is more relatable to another degF measurement?

that’s some Nobel level analysis
Posted by HeadSlash
TEAM LIVE BADASS - St. GEORGE
Member since Aug 2006
52907 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 9:04 am to
quote:

I remember being in grammar school, back in the 70's, them telling us the Metric system is going to take over in the US within the next decade...



fricking THIS and French being one of the most dominant languages in the future.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
84194 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 9:05 am to
quote:

The metric system is just so much more intuitive
In theory it is. In practice, it blows.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
281843 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 9:06 am to
quote:


Except it's not. Calculus is based


Few people in this country understand calculus.

Fahrenheit is the peoples champ and is more detailed than Celsius, which stretches their degree.

Posted by TheDeathValley
New Orleans, LA
Member since Sep 2010
18917 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 9:10 am to
quote:

Good question with complicated answers.

1. Changing to metric would carry a huge cost under the surface. Think about all the engineering documents, road signs, mile markers that would need to be updated if we swapped over. Not to mention the speedometer in every single car.

2. You would have to change how everyone thinks about speed while you make those changes. Think about trying to tech the not-so-intelligent basic fractions again?

3. The imperial standard does have its practical and pragmatic benefits. The number 12 for example can be divided by 2, 3, 4, and 6 which has its advantages in construction. Fractions like these are typically easier to deal with on a tape measure than .3333 ect.

You're not necessarily wrong thinking we should change but it's definitely more complicated than a blanket statement "we are metric now."


You did not answer his question. You gave the reasons why we will never switch over.

To the OP, the metric system is far superior. There is a reason we measure certain items in metric (fluid, race distances, etc).
Posted by MorbidTheClown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
71062 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 9:12 am to
quote:

There is a reason we measure certain items in metric


like a Metric frick Ton
Posted by Auburn80
Backwater, TN
Member since Nov 2017
8858 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 9:12 am to
quote:

idk how we got here


At the time they were meeting in France to develop the Metric system Thomas Jefferson was mad at France and refused to participate. That’s why we stayed with the Imperial system.

PS: we need to switch. There will be some short term wailing and gnashing of teeth, but we would get thru it. Think of it like a computer conversion at work. Short term pain in the butt for long term gain. Sports can be exempted but everything else needs to change.
Posted by White Bear
Yonnygo
Member since Jul 2014
16293 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 9:14 am to
quote:

French being one of the most dominant languages in the future
As it turned out ebonics be the dominant language.
Posted by BigPapiDoesItAgain
Amérique du Nord
Member since Nov 2009
3193 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 9:15 am to
Because of my profession, I tend to think in small units of weight and length in mm/cm/grams/kg, but in distance/speed, still prefer imperial. Also the math on those conversions back and forth are easy to me, so no biggie either way.

I definitely prefer Fahrenheit to Celcius - I've tried to develop a feeling for what is what with C scale, but outside of 0, 37-39 and 100C, I have no feeling for it and have to do the math conversion. It has taken me years to burn into my brain 1.8C+32=F, but it just seems random. I virtually never have a reason to go the oppisite way.

quote:

there’s something rather wonderfully intuitive in tying what’s deemed a really hot ambient temperature to human body temperature.

This is absolutely the way I think
Posted by DeltaTigerDelta
Member since Jan 2017
12732 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 9:18 am to
Give ‘em and inch and they’ll take a mile is so much more powerful than Give ‘em a centimeter and they’ll take a kilometer.
Posted by bluedragon
Birmingham
Member since May 2020
7989 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 9:21 am to
We will land on Mars too. Maybe ship all the Europeans too .....Colony that will never come back.
Posted by LittleJerrySeinfield
350,000 Post Karma
Member since Aug 2013
9437 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 9:29 am to
quote:

And 0F is meaningless.


No it's not. It means it's freaking cold.
Posted by Nutriaitch
Montegut
Member since Apr 2008
9657 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 9:34 am to
quote:

There is a reason we measure certain items in metric


quote:

fluid


we buy milk, beer, water, gasoline, diesel, oil, etc. in barrels, gallons, oz, quarts, pints cups, etc.







Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
132616 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 9:36 am to
quote:

Tell me why Imperial is better than the Metric system


I've used both my entire career as an engineer. The only time it makes a difference to me is when I'm trying to communicate force in the imperial system. If the end game it to get to pounds force as the final outcome I start in the metric system and convert newtons to pounds to make sure I'm in pounds force. The whole pounds mass, slugs and pounds force in the metric system is screwy. I mean, I know what the deal is, I just trust my calculations in the metric system when looking for force.
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
18437 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 9:39 am to
The small measurements are the only advantage I see. It's much easier to deal with millimeters than fractions of an inch. And I would much rather deal in grams than ounces. (Imperial has grains but it's only used for things like gemstones or gunpowder).

But other than that, the rest of the distance measurements are easier in imperial. For instance, it's much easier to say "he's 6 foot 2" than "he's 1.82 meters tall" which is what they do in Europe. Same goes for weight. Give me pounds over kg any day.

As another guy said, F is much better than Celsius for everyday stuff because it is more precise. You have to use decimals in Celsius to be as precise as Fahrenheit. This might not matter in a lab, but it sucks in everyday life. "Hey, Jim, how hot is it outside? Oh it's 31.73 Celsius, bro."
This post was edited on 10/23/24 at 9:40 am
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
132616 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 9:41 am to
quote:

If God intended man to use the metric system then Jesus would have had only 10 apostles
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram