Started By
Message

re: Synthetic rubber plant in crosshairs amid high cancer risk in Reserve, Louisiana community

Posted on 5/5/23 at 8:20 am to
Posted by phunkatron
Member since Jun 2019
1444 posts
Posted on 5/5/23 at 8:20 am to
quote:

What I am saying is to Doubt All Claims of Truth Based On Modern Scientific Data, or simply because your Government says that something is true.


I'm not taking advice from anyone who thinks this resembles proper capitalization rules.
Posted by brass2mouth
NOLA
Member since Jul 2007
20448 posts
Posted on 5/5/23 at 8:20 am to
quote:

what amounts of benzene is risk drastically increased? Are they getting lung cancer? And fat people have higher rates of cancer as well as cardiovascular disease.


I would be willing to bet that living in and constantly inhaling small “safe” amounts over 30-40 years would increase your risk.

Also inhaling benzene doesn’t just give you lung cancer. There’s a litany of cancers that are known to be caused by it.
Posted by KamaCausey_LSU
Member since Apr 2013
17208 posts
Posted on 5/5/23 at 8:28 am to
Not sure about Reserve specifically, but as has been pointed out a million times.

The cancer rates in "Cancer Alley" aren't abnormal once you account for poverty and demographics.
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
72108 posts
Posted on 5/5/23 at 8:36 am to
quote:

And as for EPA, the current leadership, in Dallas and DC are environmental activists and community organizers. Sound science has no place in this administration. Just another Federal agency weaponized by Biden and his handlers, sent to wage war on oil and gas (Obama had already largely taken care of coal).

It gets harder and harder to defend the EPA with every passing year.

It/they have recently lowered the thresholds within the clean air act. This makes the majority of large prescribed burns in our forests and grasslands have to be approved by the EPA. Before it was all handled by the Forestry Service in conjunction with wildland firefighters. Most prescribed burns now will exceed the threshold for the clean air act and will need special approval by the EPA which will move at a snail's pace and likely have a very low approval percentage for prescribed burns.

Because of this, our wildfire seasons WILL get worse and fighting those fires WILL get more difficult. Add in that the hiring and retention of wildland firefighters, and within the Forestry Service in general, is currently abysmal due to refusal to increase wages among other things, and we have a disaster looming.

ETA: The EPA has also banned the primary retardant used against wildfires due to runoff concerns. Those concerns may very well be valid. The issue is that the ban came before any viable or comparable alternatives for the retardant have been developed or approved. The ban literally removes one of the most effective tools firefighters have currently at their disposal for fighting fires without providing for an alternative.
This post was edited on 5/5/23 at 8:55 am
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
76466 posts
Posted on 5/5/23 at 8:42 am to
Denka certainly has, and has had, its issues over the years.

But lumping together the whole industry based on one plant is not sound logic.
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
20839 posts
Posted on 5/5/23 at 9:03 am to
quote:

Yes. It’s like uranium, some people get super human powers while some get cancer. Haven’t y’all seen watchmen before?

quote:

Oilfieldbiology

Hmm, appears the science has spoken
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138181 posts
Posted on 5/5/23 at 9:07 am to
Denka is one of the most heavily monitored plants I've ever seen. They have a pretty robust perimeter air sampling program.
Posted by frequent flyer
USA
Member since Jul 2021
3402 posts
Posted on 5/5/23 at 9:08 am to
quote:

According to the EPA, cancer risk in Reserve is about 50 times the national average. Reserve is located within an 85-mile stretch of Louisiana, between Baton Rouge and New Orleans, which contains more than 200 plants and refineries. The stretch is nicknamed "cancer alley" due to the high cancer rate in the region.


Are they sure it's the rubber plant and not the seafood diet?

A lot of pesticides and herbicides in agricultural runoff that finds its way down the river from the midwest. And Louisiana eats a LOT of seafood.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138181 posts
Posted on 5/5/23 at 9:10 am to
quote:

I don’t doubt that chemical plants can produce toxins that cause cancer, but the EPA is a den of lies whose minions are willing to create and use false data.

They are NOT a scientific organization anymore, if they ever were. They are one of the most powerful tools of the neo-marxist left that denounces objective truth and pushes false narratives for power.

I've been on an EPA audit where the EPA isn't even present. They hire contractors to do their work for them.
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
36844 posts
Posted on 5/5/23 at 9:19 am to
quote:

Petroleum products can cause cancer.


no doubt it can

but....i would be highly suspect of residents that do not work in the industry being exposed to any real level of any of that.

quote:

Fat people usually have cardiovascular issues.


its also, along with lifestyle, one of the leading causes of cancer.
Posted by Trevaylin
south texas
Member since Feb 2019
9791 posts
Posted on 5/5/23 at 9:27 am to


In the 1980's epidimolgical study showed a higher concentration of stomach cancer in south texas chem. plant operators. Much more study revealed BBQ diets were high in nitric oxides a known contributor
Posted by T
Member since Jan 2004
9889 posts
Posted on 5/5/23 at 9:31 am to
People in the river parishes think everything bad in their life is due to the plants in the area.
Posted by Saintsisit
Member since Jan 2013
5089 posts
Posted on 5/5/23 at 9:31 am to
quote:

Just outside Reserve - a town with a majority-Black population 


These f ucking writers.
Posted by OLDBEACHCOMBER
Member since Jan 2004
7548 posts
Posted on 5/5/23 at 9:39 am to
quote:

Marathon doing work.


Wrong plant. Denka (Old Dupont) Looks clean form the RR but is a cesspool. There's more injection wells there than even their employees know about.

Father in law used to bring drums of waste to Morgan City from Dupont in a cattle trailer, load them on a supply boat and take them 5 miles out and sink them with a 30-06. Dixie Cattle was the "shell" company "leasing" leasing the land from Dupont.
Posted by Cuz413
Member since Nov 2007
10043 posts
Posted on 5/5/23 at 9:43 am to
I'd love to see the benzene exposure from the plant vs the benzene exposure from pumping gas in their vehicle, lawnmower, etc.

People down here still use gasoline and other hydrocarbons to clean parts and remove grease from their hands.

I say this not to remove any responsibility from chem plants, but as an aside that there are other factors that need to be included

Posted by Saintsisit
Member since Jan 2013
5089 posts
Posted on 5/5/23 at 9:45 am to
quote:

Marathon doing work.


What an idiot. Show us you didn't read the article. Also show us you don't know Marathon's a refinery and not a synthetic rubber plant.
Posted by HoustonGumbeauxGuy
Member since Jul 2011
32813 posts
Posted on 5/5/23 at 9:48 am to
Cancer alley is nothing new

It’s also nothing fake
Posted by Mr Poop
Jefferson Parish
Member since Aug 2021
37 posts
Posted on 5/5/23 at 11:59 am to
quote:

Can’t you see why the left is pushing neo-marxists into judicial roles?


You're a fricking idiot.

There is no "neo-marxist left" in substantial power ANYWHERE in the United States and if you say otherwise, it just proves that you don't know what you're talking about.
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
41555 posts
Posted on 5/5/23 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

It’s also nothing fake


Yeah it actually is. When adjusting for demographics it’s perfectly normal
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
32821 posts
Posted on 5/5/23 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

I would be willing to bet that living in and constantly inhaling small “safe” amounts over 30-40 years would increase your risk.


You're talking chronic risk vs acute risk.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram