- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Synthetic organisms are about to challenge what 'alive' really means
Posted on 1/9/19 at 2:29 pm
Posted on 1/9/19 at 2:29 pm
LINK
Silly writer thinks the genie can be put back in the bottle.
quote:
In 2016, Craig Venter and his team at Synthetic Genomics announced that they had created a lifeform called JCVI-syn3.0, whose genome consisted of only 473 genes. This stripped-down organism was a significant breakthrough in the development of artificial life as it enabled us to understand more fully what individual genes do. (In the case of JCVI-syn3.0, most of them were used to create RNA and proteins, preserve genetic fidelity during reproduction and create the cell membrane. The functions of about a third remain a mystery.)
Venter’s achievement followed an earlier breakthrough in 2014, when Floyd Romesberg at Romesberg Lab in California succeeded in creating xeno nucleic acid (XNA), a synthetic alternative to DNA, using amino acids not found among the naturally occurring four nucleotides: adenine, cytosine, guanine and thymine.
And, most recently we have seen huge advances in the use of CRISPR, a gene-editing tool that allows substitution or injection of DNA sequences at chosen locations in a genome.
Together, these developments mean that in 2019 we will have to take seriously the possibility of our developing multicellular artificial life, and we will need to start thinking about the ethical and philosophical challenges such a possibility brings up.
In the near future we can reasonably anticipate that a large number of unnatural single-cell life forms will be created using artificially edited genomes to correct for genetic defects or to add new features to an organism’s phenotype. It is already possible to design bacterial forms, for example, that can metabolise pollutants or produce particular substances.
quote:
All of this will bring up serious issues as to how we see ourselves – and behave – as a species. While the creation of multicellular organisms that are capable of sexual reproduction is still a long way off, in 2019 we will need to begin a serious debate about whether artificially evolved humans are our future, and if we should put an end to these experiments before it is too late.
Silly writer thinks the genie can be put back in the bottle.
Posted on 1/9/19 at 2:29 pm to Jim Rockford
Misread that as “synthetic orgasms” and wondered why that was a new thing.
Posted on 1/9/19 at 2:29 pm to Jim Rockford
TLDR
I'll take a new liver though...put that damn thing through 33 years of hell
I'll take a new liver though...put that damn thing through 33 years of hell
Posted on 1/9/19 at 2:31 pm to Jim Rockford
quote:
debate about whether artificially evolved humans are our future
Ok but can we have sex with them?
Posted on 1/9/19 at 2:33 pm to ShoeBang
quote:
Ok but can we have sex with them?
And if so are they hot?
Posted on 1/9/19 at 2:35 pm to ShoeBang
quote:
Ok but can we have sex with them?
It brings up interesting legal/ethical questions.
Can you murder/Rape/assault AI?
Posted on 1/9/19 at 2:36 pm to fr33manator
quote:
Can you murder/Rape/assault AI?
Not if you program them to "ask for it" right?
Posted on 1/9/19 at 2:39 pm to fr33manator
You want scientist to create human like creatures so you can kill and rape them
Posted on 1/9/19 at 2:43 pm to OweO
quote:
You want scientist to create human like creatures so you can kill and rape them
Faux-Humans, the ultimate prey

Posted on 1/9/19 at 3:12 pm to OweO
quote:
You want scientist to create human like creatures so you can kill and rape them
Of course not. Don’t be silly.
I want to be able to open a high end restaurant and use them as food
Posted on 1/9/19 at 3:17 pm to Jim Rockford
We ain't stopping this. We working towards our own demise so we can have a legacy to hang our hat on for centuries to come.
Posted on 1/9/19 at 3:59 pm to Jim Rockford
quote:
While the creation of multicellular organisms that are capable of sexual reproduction is still a long way off,
A very, very, very long way off.
Posted on 1/9/19 at 3:59 pm to Jim Rockford
quote:
it enabled us to understand more fully what individual genes do. (In the case of JCVI-syn3.0, most of them were used to create RNA and proteins, preserve genetic fidelity during reproduction and create the cell membrane. The functions of about a third remain a mystery.)
This actually could be hugely good.
Posted on 1/9/19 at 4:01 pm to tketaco
What if we grew them and then harvested them for organs, like the Tleilaxu?
Posted on 1/9/19 at 4:08 pm to fr33manator
quote:
It brings up interesting legal/ethical questions.
Can you murder/Rape/assault AI?
Interesting, yes... but you know exactly how our society would stand on this matter.
I do like the idea of organ transplants for certain.
Posted on 1/9/19 at 4:59 pm to Jim Rockford
quote:
Synthetic organisms are about to challenge what 'alive' really means
Posted on 1/9/19 at 5:01 pm to Jim Rockford
How long until all the abused sex robots revolt and start murdering the frick out of us? It's only a matter of time...
Popular
Back to top

16
















