- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/3/20 at 12:02 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
quote:
You’ve been a bigger contrarian bitch than normal lately. What gives?
He thrives on anonymous internet attention. He has learned the more ridiculous he is the more attention he gets. Sad.
Posted on 6/3/20 at 12:02 pm to OceanMan
Sure. But the simplest explanation would be that a competing drug manufacturer paid for this study.
The idea that this fake company did it just to “get Trump” is retarded.
The idea that this fake company did it just to “get Trump” is retarded.
Posted on 6/3/20 at 12:03 pm to Salmon
quote:
The most obvious reason would be that they were paid by some other drug manufacturer.
Touche. Very well could have been that.
Posted on 6/3/20 at 12:04 pm to TH03
quote:
“They were old and dying before, they would’ve died without covid anyways.”
“Wow, how many of those lives could’ve been saved with HCQ?!?”
sorry, not really buying that as an overwhelming sentiment on here.
Posted on 6/3/20 at 12:06 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
And the VA study? Was that made up too?
Posted on 6/3/20 at 12:06 pm to mmmmmbeeer
quote:
And the VA study? Was that made up too?
It wasn't even a study.
Posted on 6/3/20 at 12:08 pm to mmmmmbeeer
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/9/20 at 12:47 pm
Posted on 6/3/20 at 12:08 pm to Janky
Test your theory and stop being a gaping vagina everytime I post then.
Posted on 6/3/20 at 12:09 pm to mmmmmbeeer
quote:
And the VA study? Was that made up too?
That was a retrospective look at their admits.
They discovered that patients that presented as worse off died more often than those that did not.
This post was edited on 6/3/20 at 12:10 pm
Posted on 6/3/20 at 12:10 pm to bbap
The former absolutely has been the entire time since the shutdown. The latter is this thread.
Posted on 6/3/20 at 12:13 pm to TH03
quote:
TH03
congrats on taking over for oweo as worst poster on this site
Posted on 6/3/20 at 12:14 pm to TH03
quote:
“They were old and dying before, they would’ve died without covid anyways.”
“Wow, how many of those lives could’ve been saved with HCQ?!?”
But when? The same day? In a week? A year? 2 years? Are you being serious with the "they were going to die anyway."
Posted on 6/3/20 at 12:15 pm to CAD703X
Wow I never thought of it like that before. That’s ground breaking new information.
Posted on 6/3/20 at 12:18 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Everyone please start taking it. Keep good notes and report back. Let's see what the OT results are after 6 weeks.
Posted on 6/3/20 at 12:18 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Gilead shut it down.
Posted on 6/3/20 at 12:18 pm to TH03
quote:
The former absolutely has been the entire time since the shutdown.
sorry i disagree. people saying it affects old people and the country shouldnt be shut down for a virus that primarily affects old and at risk people is not the same as saying "meh they were going to die anyway".
that's a pretty shitty way of looking at things and i do not think it represents the majority of views on this site like you seem to think.
Posted on 6/3/20 at 12:18 pm to TH03
It doesn’t have to have been “super bad” for it to have still worked....
Posted on 6/3/20 at 12:24 pm to mmmmmbeeer
quote:
And the VA study? Was that made up too?
Here is what the VA Secretary had to say about the "study". The good stuff starts around the 3:00 mark.
watch and listen
Posted on 6/3/20 at 12:24 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
I think the point is that the media ranted about how HCQ was not only completely ineffective as evidenced by these "studies" but it has a good chance of killing you
Are you actually suggesting that international research institutions decide whether to continue research studies based upon what is reported in the media? Do you understand how conspiratorial and insane your premise is?
Popular
Back to top


1








