- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Students shoot up a mosque in San Diego.
Posted on 5/19/26 at 2:27 pm to HoustonGumbeauxGuy
Posted on 5/19/26 at 2:27 pm to HoustonGumbeauxGuy
quote:
You shall see soon
0
Posted on 5/19/26 at 2:32 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
n the year of our Lord 2026, I’ll never understand why people still jump to label these people. There’s no upside
In the year of 2026? Really? Can't put your finger on anything?
Let's see, if ANY violence of ANY kind happens, white, black, tranny, no tranny, etc....it is a form of white supremacy.
If the perps are white in any kind of way, or even if they actually aren't white but hispanic, then it is white supremacy. Because we have a nation of stupid people, there is a significant portion of people that actually believe their is a white supremacy violence epidemic and that it is conservative white males that are doing it, which obviously is complete bullshite and a lie.
Meanwhile, if the perp is black, it is completely buried and covered up.
That obviously leads to a significant portion of the population actually believing that George Floyd was killed by a white cop and that Karmelo Anthony was justified in stabbing Austin Metcalf at a track meet.
The exact same thing with Muslim terrorist attacks: "NO MOTIVE HAS BEEN GIVEN YET."
So when tranny kids that have been programmed for violence in this country yet again commit another school shooting, it will be lumped in as "white males committing violence" which reaffirms the false narrative that white conservative males are committing violence.
"mUhhh, BoTh SiDeS"
Posted on 5/19/26 at 2:38 pm to dnm3305
it's democrats no matter the color or sex it's violent mentally ill democrats
Posted on 5/19/26 at 2:45 pm to HoustonGumbeauxGuy
quote:
some of her weapons
As a gun owner and a parent it is absolutely her responsibility to make sure the firearms are properly secured. Especially when her kid is mentally unstable. The mom carries some of the burden for this.
Posted on 5/19/26 at 2:48 pm to tigersmanager
The global-marxist effort to weaponize troons has been one of the most successful acts of subversion / terrorism of all time.
We've been in a global war or terror for a quarter-century, spent trillions, and militarized local police to that end ... but the biggest threat turned out to be mentally ill and sexually frustrated kids pumped full of MK-ultra propaganda, SSRIs and testosterone.
We've been in a global war or terror for a quarter-century, spent trillions, and militarized local police to that end ... but the biggest threat turned out to be mentally ill and sexually frustrated kids pumped full of MK-ultra propaganda, SSRIs and testosterone.
Posted on 5/19/26 at 3:01 pm to Stat M Repairman
facts
Posted on 5/19/26 at 3:49 pm to Stevo
quote:
Or let the facts play out.
The fact that this post gets downvoted just shows how fricking knee-jerk our society has become.
Posted on 5/19/26 at 4:07 pm to Stat M Repairman
quote:
SSRIs
Responsibly used SSRIs are extremely useful tools. The issues come in when you stop taking them cold turkey, and even that effect is overblown.
Posted on 5/19/26 at 4:14 pm to AgCoug
On one hand, I am very tempted to agree with "let it play out". I don't like being wrong and I definitely don't like being on the wrong side of misinformation.
But realistically, a narrative forms immediately. The people who tell you to "wait it out" when it suits them (media when the victim is a conservative, etc.) won't do so. They'll already be crafting theirs and getting it into the public sphere. It's a war of narratives from the jump.
A few years ago, I'd go "so what, the truth will come out" and that's true. It usually will, in some form. But who will hear about it? How many people today think the Pulse Nightclub shooting was landmark anti-LGBT attack? A lot, probably.
For another example, on the poliboard right now is the story of the girl who went viral in Scotland with the ax or whatever. She became an overnight sensation for the right (the idea she was defending her sister against lawless Muslim migrants). But the pushback was immediate - the Dundee police called her a troublemaker, said the claims were misinformation, and she was charged, I believe. Her own government and police ran to worldwide media and made the 13 year old the perpetrator.
Fast forward, quietly, and people she waved weapons at are on trial for harassing/assaulting young girls. She's a witness in the case. Almost nobody heard about it.
But realistically, a narrative forms immediately. The people who tell you to "wait it out" when it suits them (media when the victim is a conservative, etc.) won't do so. They'll already be crafting theirs and getting it into the public sphere. It's a war of narratives from the jump.
A few years ago, I'd go "so what, the truth will come out" and that's true. It usually will, in some form. But who will hear about it? How many people today think the Pulse Nightclub shooting was landmark anti-LGBT attack? A lot, probably.
For another example, on the poliboard right now is the story of the girl who went viral in Scotland with the ax or whatever. She became an overnight sensation for the right (the idea she was defending her sister against lawless Muslim migrants). But the pushback was immediate - the Dundee police called her a troublemaker, said the claims were misinformation, and she was charged, I believe. Her own government and police ran to worldwide media and made the 13 year old the perpetrator.
Fast forward, quietly, and people she waved weapons at are on trial for harassing/assaulting young girls. She's a witness in the case. Almost nobody heard about it.
Posted on 5/19/26 at 4:33 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
On one hand, I am very tempted to agree with "let it play out". I don't like being wrong and I definitely don't like being on the wrong side of misinformation.
But realistically, a narrative forms immediately. The people who tell you to "wait it out" when it suits them (media when the victim is a conservative, etc.) won't do so. They'll already be crafting theirs and getting it into the public sphere. It's a war of narratives from the jump.
What real narrative is being formed here? The OP, until he edited his post, said unequivocally that it was a trans shooter. There is no evidence of that, right? It may ultimately turn out to be the case, but until then, it is strictly misinformation. There is no narrative other than the one being created by falsehoods or by people making claims without sufficient information. That's textbook absurdity.
You reference the poliboard, a place where a considerable number of topics are just random bullshite Twitter feeds that people lap up as if they were truth. People see a claim that aligns with what they already want to believe, and they repeat it long before there's enough evidence to support it. Then, the same people call out the MSM being fake news. The hypocrisy would be laughable if it wasn't so alarming.
Posted on 5/19/26 at 4:37 pm to AgCoug
tranny
Posted on 5/19/26 at 4:37 pm to dnm3305
I’m not reading all of that
I’m just saying it’s dumb to state a shooter is xyz before things are more clear
Remember when they were saying a groyper shot Charlie kirk because of his appearance & some messages on the bullets? That shite is retarded
I’m just saying it’s dumb to state a shooter is xyz before things are more clear
Remember when they were saying a groyper shot Charlie kirk because of his appearance & some messages on the bullets? That shite is retarded
Posted on 5/19/26 at 4:39 pm to tigersmanager
quote:
tranny
Posted on 5/19/26 at 5:01 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
On one hand, I am very tempted to agree with "let it play out". I don't like being wrong and I definitely don't like being on the wrong side of misinformation.
But realistically, a narrative forms immediately. The people who tell you to "wait it out" when it suits them (media when the victim is a conservative, etc.) won't do so. They'll already be crafting theirs and getting it into the public sphere. It's a war of narratives from the jump.
A few years ago, I'd go "so what, the truth will come out" and that's true. It usually will, in some form. But who will hear about it? How many people today think the Pulse Nightclub shooting was landmark anti-LGBT attack? A lot, probably.
For another example, on the poliboard right now is the story of the girl who went viral in Scotland with the ax or whatever. She became an overnight sensation for the right (the idea she was defending her sister against lawless Muslim migrants). But the pushback was immediate - the Dundee police called her a troublemaker, said the claims were misinformation, and she was charged, I believe. Her own government and police ran to worldwide media and made the 13 year old the perpetrator.
Fast forward, quietly, and people she waved weapons at are on trial for harassing/assaulting young girls. She's a witness in the case. Almost nobody heard about it.
This is known as the NYT special. Blast blatant bullshite on Page 1 in full color, quietly retract the story a few weeks later on Section Z, Paragraph 23, Page 95.
Posted on 5/19/26 at 5:32 pm to Centinel
They released the footage of the shooters offing themselves in their car. Not for the weak of heart.
ETA: I haven’t followed this story, but they live streamed the shooting.
ETA: I haven’t followed this story, but they live streamed the shooting.
This post was edited on 5/19/26 at 5:38 pm
Posted on 5/19/26 at 5:48 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
On one hand, I am very tempted to agree with "let it play out". I don't like being wrong and I definitely don't like being on the wrong side of misinformation.
But realistically, a narrative forms immediately. The people who tell you to "wait it out" when it suits them (media when the victim is a conservative, etc.) won't do so. They'll already be crafting theirs and getting it into the public sphere. It's a war of narratives from the jump.
Yes, it's frustrating that media outlets jump the gun to get their narratives out, and ideologues run with an angle without objectivity, but that doesn't mean that people should abandon their integrity just because disingenuous actors have abandoned theirs.
This post was edited on 5/19/26 at 5:50 pm
Posted on 5/19/26 at 6:15 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
Remember when they were saying a groyper shot Charlie kirk because of his appearance & some messages on the bullets?
your points stands, but that’s not exactly how that went down. (not saying you’re intentionally mixing it up)
Posted on 5/19/26 at 7:38 pm to Klark Kent
So.. was it a transformer or not
Posted on 5/19/26 at 7:48 pm to VermilionTiger
I’m still waiting on Reddit to give me the latest talking points to copy and paste.
Posted on 5/19/26 at 8:26 pm to VermilionTiger
quote:
So.. was it a transformer or not
What do you think?
This post was edited on 5/19/26 at 8:27 pm
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News