- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Stanford Medicine says it 'strongly supports the use of face masks' to prevent covid
Posted on 4/22/21 at 11:50 am
Posted on 4/22/21 at 11:50 am
Someone had posted a study the other day saying it was a study from Stanford saying insane things like masks can cause diabetes. Well that article was not by Stanford Dr's. Stanford has released a statement regarding said article.
Here is the TD thread that had the misinformation
Stanford study finds masks ineffective.
Study isn't linked to Stanford - AP News
quote:
The paper has no affiliation with Stanford University. It was published by an exercise psychologist with "no academic connection to Stanford University" in a journal that publishes “radical, speculative and non-mainstream scientific ideas,"
Here is the TD thread that had the misinformation
Stanford study finds masks ineffective.
Study isn't linked to Stanford - AP News
This post was edited on 4/22/21 at 11:54 am
30
Posted on 4/22/21 at 11:51 am to CrimsonFever
Thank you government fact checker. I for one am glad that the government is here on TD to correct my wrong think and fake news
Posted on 4/22/21 at 11:52 am to CrimsonFever
quote:
according to Snopes.
I guess we’ll just have to go with the CDC saying masks are less than 1.5% effective.
Nice edit to remove the according to Snopes part, hack.
This post was edited on 4/22/21 at 11:56 am
Posted on 4/22/21 at 11:53 am to CrimsonFever
Thank you soldier of the revolution! The Peoples Democratic Socialist States thank you for being a loyalist and protecting us from harmful words!
Posted on 4/22/21 at 11:54 am to CrimsonFever
Is it safe to just say that even the medical field doesn't really know what is best/effective in this situation based on the diversity of information and articles? That it really comes down to people believing that masks may help/doesn't hurt vs. they are a social/medical necessity?
Posted on 4/22/21 at 11:55 am to Seeker
quote:
Is it safe to just say that even the medical field doesn't really know what is best/effective in this situation based on the diversity of information and articles?
It's safe to say that they know a lot more about what is/isn't than most people not in the medical field.
Posted on 4/22/21 at 11:55 am to CrimsonFever
The people here aren't gonna give a shite that they were duped, they've already made up their minds. It's sad
Posted on 4/22/21 at 11:56 am to CrimsonFever
quote:
Stanford Medicine says it 'strongly supports the use of face masks' to prevent covid
Uummm. They tried to sell that lie over a year ago... do they think people are really going to believe it after a FULL frickING YEAR of mask mandates?
Posted on 4/22/21 at 11:56 am to CrimsonFever
This is Russian disinformation. Truth is what you want it be.
truth·i·ness
/'tro?oTHenis/
the quality of seeming or being felt to be true, even if not necessarily true
truth·i·ness
/'tro?oTHenis/
the quality of seeming or being felt to be true, even if not necessarily true
This post was edited on 4/22/21 at 11:58 am
Posted on 4/22/21 at 11:59 am to CrimsonFever
quote:
Cardiology Division, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System/Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States
Received 4 October 2020, Revised 28 October 2020, Accepted 19 November 2020, Available online 22 November 2020.
That's what the study had on it.
LINK to study
Posted on 4/22/21 at 11:59 am to CrimsonFever
CrimsonFever
Didn't you post some bullshite disinformation about Sicknick?
Didn't you post some bullshite disinformation about Sicknick?
Posted on 4/22/21 at 12:01 pm to CrimsonFever
quote:
in a journal that publishes “radical, speculative and non-mainstream scientific ideas,"
Same company also publishes The Lancet and Cell. Their "crime" is allowing their editors more freedom to publish articles that may go against "mainstream scientific ideas".
Posted on 4/22/21 at 12:01 pm to CrimsonFever
Great news! It had been about 3:50 since we’ve had a mask thread
Posted on 4/22/21 at 12:02 pm to CrimsonFever
quote:
It's safe to say that they know a lot more about what is/isn't than most people not in the medical field.
ehhh, medical professionals have gotten to political. Commons sense is with a pound of cure.. or something like that.
Posted on 4/22/21 at 12:02 pm to CrimsonFever
Stanford has some pretty smart guys there.
Posted on 4/22/21 at 12:03 pm to CrimsonFever
You Masked Covidians are fricking weird.
Posted on 4/22/21 at 12:03 pm to CrimsonFever
Guess what, I’m still not wearing a mask. How does that make your sister-fricking self feel?
Posted on 4/22/21 at 12:04 pm to CrimsonFever
Science and politics can’t mix
Posted on 4/22/21 at 12:05 pm to CrimsonFever
quote:
It's safe to say that they know a lot more about what is/isn't than most people not in the medical field.
Not when their opinions are based out of politics.
Posted on 4/22/21 at 12:06 pm to CrimsonFever
quote:
It's safe to say that they know a lot more about what is/isn't than most people not in the medical field.
John's Hopkins said that the lack of masks at "protests" was no big deal. They said that in an official statement.
When medical institutions have willingly waded into politics, you should question everything they say.
Page 1 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News