- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So how do all you moon landing deny imbeciles like your crow?
Posted on 4/7/26 at 8:02 am to Ace Midnight
Posted on 4/7/26 at 8:02 am to Ace Midnight
It wasn't last week, it was 60 years ago.
So when I hear something being questioned, I hear it out. Engine technologies and efficiency back then was not the same. O rings failing in the 80s, and heat shield issues with shuttle..but back in the 60s all those things had no issues.
I do doubt certain aspects of what NASA did. Like anything, i think they did some fake stuff to sensationalize the mission, and got caught. I think they did some fake stuff in studio and made it part of the mission, and thats what people used to discredit the whole trip. They've had some incredibly smart humans who have doubted things as well. Hard to ignore that as well
If it was legit, great! But I dont believe that every single thing they showed was legit.
So when I hear something being questioned, I hear it out. Engine technologies and efficiency back then was not the same. O rings failing in the 80s, and heat shield issues with shuttle..but back in the 60s all those things had no issues.
I do doubt certain aspects of what NASA did. Like anything, i think they did some fake stuff to sensationalize the mission, and got caught. I think they did some fake stuff in studio and made it part of the mission, and thats what people used to discredit the whole trip. They've had some incredibly smart humans who have doubted things as well. Hard to ignore that as well
If it was legit, great! But I dont believe that every single thing they showed was legit.
This post was edited on 4/7/26 at 8:07 am
7
Posted on 4/7/26 at 8:03 am to TigerGman
Lmao. There is no moon
Posted on 4/7/26 at 8:05 am to TigerGman
I mean it’s been 56 years and we now have AI and supercomputers and unlimited tech, money and knowledge and this crew still deals with broken toilets and other issues and the other lunar lander couldn’t even land upright
And we have plenty of examples of our government completely lying to us
I get the skepticism even if I don’t believe it
And we have plenty of examples of our government completely lying to us
I get the skepticism even if I don’t believe it
Posted on 4/7/26 at 8:05 am to ChatGPT of LA
quote:
It wasn't last week, it was 60 years ago.
What was 60 years ago?
quote:
So when I hear something being questioned, I hear it out.
What if you're not real?
quote:
Engine technologies and efficiency back then was not the same.
True. But human capital was probably superior. #Dealwithit
quote:
I do doubt certain aspects of what NASA did.
Examples?
quote:
Like anything, i think they did some fake stuff to sensationaalize
Examples?
Posted on 4/7/26 at 8:06 am to Eighteen
quote:
I get the skepticism even if I don’t believe it
I know I'm taking a somewhat hard line with the skeptics in this thread (because I've lost patience with them, overall), but from a general standpoint, I am actually here as well.
This post was edited on 4/7/26 at 8:07 am
Posted on 4/7/26 at 8:08 am to dstone12
Best part of this is...
Apparently all the actors and extras lost it laughing right after so they cut away really quick.
quote:
...Jim Carrey ad-libbed the famous "WE'VE LANDED ON THE MOON!" line in the 1994 movie Dumb and Dumber. While walking out of a bar in Aspen, he improvised the line upon seeing a framed 1969 newspaper article on the wall.
Apparently all the actors and extras lost it laughing right after so they cut away really quick.
Posted on 4/7/26 at 8:08 am to Who_Dat_Tiger
quote:
I wasn’t around to see it myself and I’m an open minded person. I never said we never landed on the moon I’m just not close minded
Do you believe World War 2 was real or are you open minded about it because it didn’t happen in your specific lifetime?
To borrow a line from these types: I’m just asking questions.
Posted on 4/7/26 at 8:08 am to Ace Midnight
I'm not heavily on one side or the other, mostly because I don't particularly care about space travel enough to really put much effort into arguing about it. But I do find it odd that we were able to land on the moon once, and with all the advancement in technology, we have not been able to do it again. Is there a satisfactory answer to why that is?
Posted on 4/7/26 at 8:13 am to TigerGman
Honestly, if you think about it, who gives a frick.
Posted on 4/7/26 at 8:15 am to WhiskeyThrottle
quote:
But I do find it odd that we were able to land on the moon once, and with all the advancement in technology, we have not been able to do it again.
It was not once. Apollo 11-17.
Posted on 4/7/26 at 8:16 am to ChatGPT of LA
quote:
O rings failing in the 80s, and heat shield issues with shuttle..but back in the 60s all those things had no issues.
Posted on 4/7/26 at 8:16 am to 225Tyga
"LRO Imagery: The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO), along with spacecraft from China, India, and Japan, has captured high-resolution images of the Apollo landing sites, showing the abandoned descent modules, rovers, and even astronaut footprints." Yeah, let's use whatever tech we have to make some fake footprints on the moon and put a rover there to fake a moon landing.
Posted on 4/7/26 at 8:17 am to ChatGPT of LA
quote:
O rings failing in the 80s, and heat shield issues with shuttle..but back in the 60s all those things had no issues.
Are you under the impression that NASA never faced any malfunctions, equipment failures or other issues until the 80s?
Posted on 4/7/26 at 8:22 am to Ace Midnight
quote:Also we supposedly lost the tech or forgot how to get back to the moon.
But, to your question, one of the main arguments the Moon hoax proponents have is that humans can't really survive the transit of the Van Allen radiation belts
This post was edited on 4/7/26 at 8:22 am
Posted on 4/7/26 at 8:22 am to ChatGPT of LA
quote:
O rings failing in the 80s, and heat shield issues with shuttle..but back in the 60s all those things had no issues.
Just shows you don't know history. See Friendship 7, Gemini 4, Gemini 8, Apollo 1 and 13. To say early NASA didn't have problems is disingenuous. Come on.
This post was edited on 4/7/26 at 8:22 am
Posted on 4/7/26 at 8:26 am to ChatGPT of LA
quote:
Engine technologies and efficiency back then was not the same.
Literally the engine used was designed 45 years ago.
Posted on 4/7/26 at 8:26 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
Artemis II didn't orbit the moon - it was a flyby on a free return trajectory.
you are asking me to believe we landed on the moon by insisting that i now also believe that the Artemis II did a flyby on a free return trajectory?
Posted on 4/7/26 at 8:27 am to Lonnie Utah
quote:
Just shows you don't know history. See Friendship 7, Gemini 4, Gemini 8, Apollo 1 and 13. To say early NASA didn't have problems is disingenuous. Come on.
Don’t forget Skylab. Whole thing was a failure NASA would rather forget
Posted on 4/7/26 at 8:31 am to wesfau
No..im saying with unfathomable advances in technology, testing, materials, and computing.a.. we were still struggling with some basic EARTH related elements, right her in our own atmosphere. 20 years later
No of that proves that landing didnt happen. It just gives questions relating to technology back then, compared to many many years later.
Those guys didnt just circle by. The got out, drove around in vehicles, walked in suits, and entered a seperate module to shoot back to earth and land safely. All the things that would have had to go correctly, is unfathomable, especially without computing technology.
No of that proves that landing didnt happen. It just gives questions relating to technology back then, compared to many many years later.
Those guys didnt just circle by. The got out, drove around in vehicles, walked in suits, and entered a seperate module to shoot back to earth and land safely. All the things that would have had to go correctly, is unfathomable, especially without computing technology.
Posted on 4/7/26 at 8:33 am to Lonnie Utah
quote:
NASA didn't have problems
On the moon trip, they didnt. At least not failures.
Of course, NASA had failures. I never implied they didnt. Weren't some of those you mentioned after the moon landing?
Page 2 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News