- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So a pharmacy in NYC is now charging men 7% more because of male privilege
Posted on 10/18/16 at 4:12 pm to NYNolaguy1
Posted on 10/18/16 at 4:12 pm to NYNolaguy1
Don't be dumb and cry discrimination like all the snowflakes.
The free market will take care of this.
The free market will take care of this.
Posted on 10/18/16 at 4:12 pm to Golfer
quote:
quote:
Their goal is to publicize one of womanhood's financial hardships (because let's not forget the wage gap). The figure comes from a report the New York City Department of Consumer Affairs published last year. Testing across five major categories, the study found products marketed to women cost (you guessed it) on average 7% more than the equivalent male ones.
Well, that's because a female's willingness to pay for said product is higher. Likely because they value beauty products more than men.
This is Econ 101.
That and women are the majority spenders of household income; ergo, companies have a higher incentive to target that market.
Posted on 10/18/16 at 4:13 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:
there is no ban on price discrimination for goods, only services.
So what she is saying is that bakers are allowed to charge a 10,000% markup on gay wedding cakes?
Posted on 10/18/16 at 4:15 pm to NYNolaguy1
On principle I don't disagree. It's a private business.
The free market will close the place down.
The free market will close the place down.
Posted on 10/18/16 at 4:18 pm to NYNolaguy1
I wonder if this same person would support a black tax
Posted on 10/18/16 at 4:19 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:
NYC Department of Consumer Affairs also told Gothamist the promotion follows the law because there is no ban on price discrimination for goods, only services.
Oh boy
This post was edited on 10/18/16 at 4:20 pm
Posted on 10/18/16 at 4:22 pm to southernelite
quote:
Oh boy
This is a fantastic way to make sure the uh composition of your store is what you want.
Posted on 10/18/16 at 4:25 pm to LordSaintly
quote:
The free market will close the place down.
The free market likely won't have a chance to work here because SJW's and the gubment will step in far too soon for that to happen.
Posted on 10/18/16 at 4:29 pm to upgrayedd
quote:This.
I fully support their right to do so!
I hope they lose a shitload of business but they should be able to do what they want.
Posted on 10/18/16 at 4:30 pm to CptBengal
quote:
well thats an easy lawsuit.
Or better, just an easy place to avoid patronizing if you're male.
Posted on 10/18/16 at 4:31 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:Can of Worms [OPEN] CLOSED
The NYC Department of Consumer Affairs also told Gothamist the promotion follows the law because there is no ban on price discrimination for goods, only services.
Posted on 10/18/16 at 4:41 pm to LordSaintly
quote:
On principle I don't disagree. It's a private business.
Technically, it's privately owned, but it caters to the public, so it's not a "private business" under the law. The ACLU will probably hit them because this is that slippery slope. Where is the Men Only water fountain?
Posted on 10/18/16 at 4:47 pm to tigerpimpbot
quote:
Where is the ____ Only water fountain?
Slippery slope indeed. Hey, at least NYC says it's legal.
Posted on 10/18/16 at 5:34 pm to NYNolaguy1
It's funny how this thread isn't getting anyone talking about women's products costing more, and instead talking about this "tax." It's actually having the opposite effect that the store owner intended.
Without fully reading the article, it sounds like they are saying things like shampoo and razors that are typically marketed to specific genders have the women's equivalent costing more. In reality, what's stopping women from buying a men's razor? My wife often borrows mine and says it works better. Does she really need one that is pink?
Without fully reading the article, it sounds like they are saying things like shampoo and razors that are typically marketed to specific genders have the women's equivalent costing more. In reality, what's stopping women from buying a men's razor? My wife often borrows mine and says it works better. Does she really need one that is pink?
This post was edited on 10/18/16 at 6:22 pm
Posted on 10/18/16 at 5:39 pm to Golfer
quote:
Well, that's because a female's willingness to pay for said product is higher. Likely because they value beauty products more than men. This is Econ 101.
This point is not discussed nearly enough. It's not like the government is setting these prices. The free market is. Guys won't pay $8 for shampoo but women will. Therefore, the price is $8 for women's shampoo.
Posted on 10/18/16 at 5:44 pm to SpqrTiger
quote:What if you identify yourself as a woman, only when you are shopping?
How can you tell if it's a man? What about the other 70 genders that are out there these days?
Posted on 10/18/16 at 5:45 pm to NYNolaguy1
So in theory, having male privilege is not a privilege right? If you have to pay a tax for it.
Posted on 10/18/16 at 5:46 pm to DawgGONIT
It's called gender fluid and it's what I identify as, so have some fricking respect. I switch back and forth depending how I'm feeling at any given time.
Calling me by the appropriate gender is not an option. It's a requirement if you want to talk to me.
Calling me by the appropriate gender is not an option. It's a requirement if you want to talk to me.
Posted on 10/18/16 at 5:48 pm to Bmath
I know it sounds dumb, but I get Secret Ultra Dry. I know it's probably placebo effect, but it works better than all the other types I got.
Popular
Back to top


0







