Started By
Message

Sign language at press conferences such as this

Posted on 3/27/23 at 4:24 pm
Posted by Bamafig
Member since Nov 2018
3150 posts
Posted on 3/27/23 at 4:24 pm
Why? Is closed captioning not a standard option in 2023? We don’t have signers for tornado warnings, or WH press conferences, for example. What level of importance requires a signer? My guess is that it’s a sacred cow now or “monkey see, monkey do”. It’s distracting and has outlived its usefulness.
Posted by 225Tyga
Member since Oct 2013
15812 posts
Posted on 3/27/23 at 4:28 pm to
Always makes me chuckle when I see sign language being given next to the speaker.
Posted by SUB
Member since Jan 2001
Member since Jan 2009
20856 posts
Posted on 3/27/23 at 4:31 pm to
Do they have closed captioning for the people attending the press conference too?
Posted by keakar
Member since Jan 2017
30029 posts
Posted on 3/27/23 at 4:31 pm to
if they can learn to sign they can also learn to read lips, that seems like a basic requirement for the hearing impaired
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260630 posts
Posted on 3/27/23 at 4:32 pm to
Probably lawyers involved.
Posted by Btrtigerfan
Disgruntled employee
Member since Dec 2007
21459 posts
Posted on 3/27/23 at 4:34 pm to
Tornado Watch is very offensive to blind folks of color.
Posted by Btrtigerfan
Disgruntled employee
Member since Dec 2007
21459 posts
Posted on 3/27/23 at 4:35 pm to
Don’t get me started on the HERicanes.
Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
30578 posts
Posted on 3/27/23 at 4:36 pm to
The sign language industry has our government by the balls. Big sign language will never give up their seat of power to the little guys like closed captioning
Posted by OchoDedos
Republic of Texas
Member since Oct 2014
34103 posts
Posted on 3/27/23 at 4:37 pm to
The Mayor of Nashville is a left wing Democrat named Cooper, which automatically qualifies him as an idiot based on his family's genetics.
Posted by AutoYes_Clown
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2012
5176 posts
Posted on 3/27/23 at 4:51 pm to
Ari Latino GOAT

LINK

WBRZ LINK

This post was edited on 3/27/23 at 4:53 pm
Posted by tigergirl10
Member since Jul 2019
10311 posts
Posted on 3/27/23 at 4:56 pm to
quote:

they can learn to sign they can also learn to read lips, that seems like a basic requirement for the hearing impaired
Learn to be a decent human being. Basic requirement for life.
Posted by nealnan8
Atlanta
Member since Oct 2016
1640 posts
Posted on 3/27/23 at 4:59 pm to
There are also many talk-to-text apps made specifically for the deaf.
Posted by SlapahoeTribe
Tiger Nation
Member since Jul 2012
12104 posts
Posted on 3/27/23 at 5:31 pm to
quote:

Do they have closed captioning for the people attending the press conference too?

Do news organizations have a habit of hiring deaf people to attend press conferences? Are they going to hire blind sportscasters too?
Posted by SlapahoeTribe
Tiger Nation
Member since Jul 2012
12104 posts
Posted on 3/27/23 at 5:38 pm to
quote:

What level of importance requires a signer?

It’s a form of virtue signaling. I’m not saying it doesn’t have some usefulness (maybe), but none of the signers are there because someone was genuinely concerned about the extremely unlikely occurrence of a deaf attendee or some deaf person who somehow had a TV without closed captioning.

Or it’s “monkey see, monkey do” and the organizer thinks it makes things look more important because they saw some other event do it.
Posted by LemmyLives
Texas
Member since Mar 2019
6427 posts
Posted on 3/27/23 at 5:47 pm to
100% on board with you; I can't watch a show with British people in it without closed captioning, and it ... works. Yet we have to have people sign during BS press conferences? 100% virtue signaling. Microsoft Translate can literally translate what I say in real time, even without Internet access, and we have to pay someone to sign? Keep it simple, stupid. CC is simple, and mostly largely automated. Even people that aren't deaf that speak English are likely to need CC for Irish/Scottish/Northern England accents.

Kinda like how if you're from the Chalmette, I don't need to ask where you're from after three words come out of your mouth.
Posted by bamaswallows
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
1177 posts
Posted on 3/27/23 at 5:59 pm to
How many deaf people go to press conferences?
Posted by Odysseus32
Member since Dec 2009
7320 posts
Posted on 3/27/23 at 6:24 pm to
I find it hard to believe you're serious. If you want to argue on the grounds of there aren't enough deaf people to warrant signing, fine. But to say there's no usefulness is...I don't know what to call it really. Wrong?

What about deaf people actually at the event?

What about deaf people in public who want to know what's going on, but don't have access to turn on captions?

You mention talk to sign apps, what if the person on stage has an accent and the app misinterprets?

It's shocking how many people are saying it's useless, almost as if they've been fed a talking point. Why there are people signing at the podium has to be one of the most common sense questions I've ever encountered.

One of America's proudest achievements is the advancement in access to basic services for people who are disabled. We are a world leader in this regard. How is helping people out who might be deaf and want to know what's going on virtue signaling?
This post was edited on 3/27/23 at 6:30 pm
Posted by LemmyLives
Texas
Member since Mar 2019
6427 posts
Posted on 3/27/23 at 6:37 pm to
quote:

But to say there's no usefulness is


Someone has to pay for the translation. A Dominican woman in Queens would probably like another cop on her block, just guessing.

The app misinterprets? Are you kidding? I've translated "Are these chicken feet or chicken meat" in Hangul in an app, the the woman working at the grocery store in Korea knew exactly what it meant.

Turn on CC in Netflix or Hulu, and see what happens. There will be apostrophes in the wrong place, and certain uses of verbs which aren't quite right, but it's perfectly fine, especially when you have a press conference (which also has a transcript published) where a politician says nothing.

How many braille books are in your local county library? Does anyone care, since you can check out audio books through Libby?

Your selective outrage, again, does not take into account that everything needs to be paid for at the explicit expense of some other government service.

From the wildly exclusive state of NY, I'll quote exactly that they say deaf people complain about, and hint, it's not council meetings, and press conferences.

quote:

Through local meetings, AIM learned the three biggest concerns of deaf individuals are:

•Having hospitals provide an interpreter for the deaf

•Interacting with law enforcement

•Local schools not interacting with deaf parents by video phone, TTY or text message in cases of emergency
Posted by Crisprdestroyer
Member since Sep 2017
597 posts
Posted on 3/27/23 at 6:44 pm to
Have y’all every watched close capturing on the fly. It’s not great. This helps more people than you realize. I swear of all the things to complain about. You should see the number of people that show up to the church I attend because this is a service that is provided.
Posted by Odysseus32
Member since Dec 2009
7320 posts
Posted on 3/27/23 at 6:59 pm to
quote:

Turn on CC in Netflix or Hulu, and see what happens. There will be apostrophes in the wrong place, and certain uses of verbs which aren't quite right, but it's perfectly fine, especially when you have a press conference (which also has a transcript published) where a politician says nothing.


I don't agree with this at all.

My wife and I watch TV with subtitles on and there are times when the caption is so wrong to the point that if you didn't know the tone of what was being said you wouldn't have context. Maybe not verbatim, but there have been times I've mentioned that if a deaf person was watching a show, they would be confused.

quote:

The app misinterprets? Are you kidding? I've translated "Are these chicken feet or chicken meat" in Hangul in an app, the the woman working at the grocery store in Korea knew exactly what it meant.


Okay, that's great for your interaction. Would you agree that it's possible that the app might misinterpret something? You're implying that it's ludicrous to think technology wouldn't work as intended.

quote:

Someone has to pay for the translation. A Dominican woman in Queens would probably like another cop on her block, just guessing.


You bolded this as if it's not something I thought about. It was actually what I considered the most before responding. The overall value of having that service available is definitely worth it, both directly and indirectly. If you want to talk about the value of government and shortsightedness when it comes to taxpayer dollars, I can think of about a hundred more useless things from which to reroute funds before we start taking away services for the disabled.

I also think you're misintepreting my tone. It's not outrage more than it is befuddlement that people are upset that we are a country that offers sign-lamguage during press conferences.

quote:

From the wildly exclusive state of NY, I'll quote exactly that they say deaf people complain about, and hint, it's not council meetings, and press conferences.


Why would they have concern about a need that's being met? I think it actually speaks to my point that the top concern you listed is having available interpreters.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram