Started By
Message

Should we build a Dyson Sphere to harvest 100 percent of sunlight?

Posted on 4/30/22 at 9:13 pm
Posted by UndercoverBryologist
Member since Nov 2020
8077 posts
Posted on 4/30/22 at 9:13 pm


quote:

A Dyson sphere is a hypothetical megastructure that completely encompasses a star and captures a large percentage of its solar power output. The concept is a thought experiment that attempts to explain how a spacefaring civilization would meet its energy requirements once those requirements exceed what can be generated from the home planet's resources alone. Because only a tiny fraction of a star's energy emissions reaches the surface of any orbiting planet, building structures encircling a star would enable a civilization to harvest far more energy.


Should this be the end goal for Solar System-based organisms for the remaining 4 billion years of the Sun’s life?
Posted by Lynyrd
Under the Tilt-a-Whirl
Member since Jun 2010
13175 posts
Posted on 4/30/22 at 9:16 pm to
Sure. We've made it to the moon. Why not encapsulate a star next and harness it's power.
Posted by boxcarbarney
Above all things, be a man
Member since Jul 2007
22742 posts
Posted on 4/30/22 at 9:22 pm to
As seen in Star Trek The Next Generation episode Relics.

Posted by RougeDawg
Member since Jul 2016
5873 posts
Posted on 4/30/22 at 9:23 pm to
Not if DSLD is the contractor.
Posted by Dawgfanman
Member since Jun 2015
22427 posts
Posted on 4/30/22 at 9:23 pm to
quote:

A Dyson sphere


Will work well but cost 2 times as much as other spheres and have a very long cord.
Posted by Doublebagger
Member since Mar 2021
960 posts
Posted on 4/30/22 at 9:23 pm to
Better off splitting the adom
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
25672 posts
Posted on 4/30/22 at 9:27 pm to
quote:

Better off splitting the adom


Better yet let's start gluing nuclei together.
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
27076 posts
Posted on 4/30/22 at 9:27 pm to
A Dyson Sphere only makes sense in the context of using a solar system as a fueling station. If you also need direct raw light from the star to sustain life within the solar system, a Dyson Sphere is Armageddon.

It’s a fun concept, but the reality is that even in theory, it generally makes more sense to capture a large portion of the energy from a star, with an emphasis on direction, than it does to capture all of the energy from a star.
This post was edited on 4/30/22 at 9:29 pm
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
33905 posts
Posted on 4/30/22 at 9:29 pm to
quote:

Should


This isn't the right word.
Posted by bad93ex
Member since Sep 2018
27248 posts
Posted on 4/30/22 at 9:29 pm to
Why don't we just start out with Nuclear Fusion first?
Posted by UndercoverBryologist
Member since Nov 2020
8077 posts
Posted on 4/30/22 at 9:30 pm to
quote:

Better yet let's start gluing nuclei together.


Nucleosynthesis is too difficult without million degree X-rays to overcome the electro repulsive Coloumb barrier. And we can only do that by kick-starting with a fission trigger, and only in the case of deuterium.


...Nope, it’s Dyson Sphere or bust.
Posted by Pandy Fackler
Member since Jun 2018
14174 posts
Posted on 4/30/22 at 9:43 pm to
They make good vacuum cleaners.
Posted by VeniVidiVici
Gaul
Member since Feb 2012
1728 posts
Posted on 4/30/22 at 9:50 pm to
Liberator wants a Dyson Disc
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 4/30/22 at 9:52 pm to
Seems easy enough.
Posted by cbree88
South Louisiana
Member since Feb 2010
5372 posts
Posted on 4/30/22 at 9:54 pm to
Maybe the Bissell version would be better?
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
9402 posts
Posted on 4/30/22 at 9:58 pm to
quote:

It’s a fun concept, but the reality is that even in theory, it generally makes more sense to capture a large portion of the energy from a star, with an emphasis on direction, than it does to capture all of the energy from a star.

As I understand it, the theory is generally that a Dyson sphere would start as exactly that but then grow exponentially as the civilization has access to more and more energy.

By the time you get to a full sphere, the civilization is harvesting so much energy from the star that direct “natural” light isn’t needed anymore.

At least that’s how I’ve interpreted it, anyhow.
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
25672 posts
Posted on 4/30/22 at 10:00 pm to
quote:

Nope, it’s Dyson Sphere or bust.


I thought about going down the road of nerdy but OTT jokes but realized I would sound like Liberator...

Posted by DVinBR
Member since Jan 2013
12993 posts
Posted on 4/30/22 at 10:03 pm to
viable nuclear fusion is the answer, hydrogen is the most common element in the universe
Posted by Crisprdestroyer
Member since Sep 2017
597 posts
Posted on 4/30/22 at 10:08 pm to
Sphere no but we definitely should strive to get a dyson swarm going.
Posted by flyAU
Scottsdale
Member since Dec 2010
24851 posts
Posted on 4/30/22 at 10:09 pm to
frick the sun. Let’s do it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram