- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Settle a drunken argument: Tyson vs Bruce Lee no holds barred KO match
Posted on 2/14/17 at 7:58 pm to The Boat
Posted on 2/14/17 at 7:58 pm to The Boat
quote:
Is this stupid shite really 53 pages?
I assumed it took a turn for the worst a while back. Some Trump argument or stupid shite. But no, it's 53 pages of the same arguments over and over again.
EDIT - 54 pages.
This post was edited on 2/14/17 at 7:59 pm
Posted on 2/14/17 at 7:59 pm to ShortyRob
I still remember the clowns who thought a 400 pound gorilla would win a fight with a 800-1100 pound grizzly.
Posted on 2/14/17 at 8:25 pm to BigSquirrel
Mike Tyson wouldn't be sitting in a chair
Posted on 2/15/17 at 7:57 am to mailman
quote:
who cares if you're the strongest if you can't attack your component.
Hell yeah. Attack that component.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 8:00 am to danman6336
Apples to plutonium
Both men were entertainers. Both men handled themselves on the rough streets in their youth. Both men were (in different ways) tremendous physical specimens.
BUT, your hypo doesn't really explain the situation. Normally a good big man beats a good small man. At each's physical prime - Tyson had roughly 70 pounds on Lee. Lee was incredibly strong for 145 pounds. A million variables could decide this.
Both men were entertainers. Both men handled themselves on the rough streets in their youth. Both men were (in different ways) tremendous physical specimens.
BUT, your hypo doesn't really explain the situation. Normally a good big man beats a good small man. At each's physical prime - Tyson had roughly 70 pounds on Lee. Lee was incredibly strong for 145 pounds. A million variables could decide this.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 8:14 am to Jake88
quote:
but usually the bigger man wins.
Don't tell that to Mike Tyson.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 8:35 am to prplhze2000
Posted on 2/15/17 at 9:22 am to danman6336
quote:
Tyson vs Bruce Lee no holds barred KO match
Boxers lose in these situations 10/10 times. Boxing and fighting are two totally different things.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 9:34 am to RedPants
Anyone who thinks Bruce Lee was an actual fighter probably believes OJ was innocent. Tyson's heart rate would barely be elevated as they are putting a toe tag on Bruce Lee's corpse.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 9:35 am to Henry Jones Jr
quote:
Bruce Lee would kill Tyson. Faster, stronger, smarter and can do way more things than just punch hard.
Bruce Lee was not stronger than Mike Tyson.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 9:37 am to RedPants
quote:Well, Tyson didnt really box. He went into the ring and fricking knocked you out
Boxing and fighting are two totally different things.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 9:39 am to Henry Jones Jr
quote:
Tyson wouldn't touch him. Lee was way faster than Tyson in his prime.
You must not remember Tyson in his prime.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 9:40 am to lsupride87
Tyson was actually technically skilled before he started doing what you said...he regressed to the point where he would stand up and start swinging but his first few years he was hard as shite to hit. He moved his head and swung his body lightning fast in addition to throwing the hardest and fastest punch I've ever seen. That mike Tyson would make quick work of Lennox Lewis or Evander Holyfield
Posted on 2/15/17 at 9:42 am to DelU249
Dottie did not drop the ball on purpose!
Posted on 2/15/17 at 9:42 am to CoachChappy
quote:his best highlights are him evading flurries of punches while standing an inch away from his opponent.
You must not remember Tyson in his prime.
People only remember the Tyson who stood there and threw punches ans even still he was doing that for a few years before he finally lost
Posted on 2/15/17 at 9:44 am to SoFla Tideroller
quote:
Anyone who thinks Bruce Lee was an actual fighter probably believes OJ was innocent
OJ was guilty, but Tyson was not
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:12 am to RedPants
quote:
Boxers lose in these situations 10/10 times. Boxing and fighting are two totally different things.
Please state 10 specific examples to support your argument.
You do realize when Bruce Lee beat Chuck Norris and Kareem Abdoul Jabbar they were acting, right. I'm as big a Bruce Lee fan as anyone, but he would need some numbchucks or a Donatello Bo-Staff to stand a chance against Tyson.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:24 am to whoisnickdoobs
Good grief, people. I'm speaking more to boxer vs martial artist/mma in general.
Popular
Back to top


0








