- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

SC Circuit Judge Rules Civil Asset Forfeiture in SC Unconstitutional
Posted on 10/15/19 at 3:40 pm
Posted on 10/15/19 at 3:40 pm
(no message)
This post was edited on 7/2/20 at 8:59 am
Posted on 10/15/19 at 3:42 pm to TheRock
Should be unconstitutional everywhere
Posted on 10/15/19 at 3:44 pm to TheRock
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/9/23 at 8:06 am
Posted on 10/15/19 at 3:45 pm to TheRock
This is my home county. I’ve appeared in front of Judge John many times. He’s a no-nonsense Citadel grad. Good for him.
Posted on 10/15/19 at 3:50 pm to TheRock
quote:That man is a hero!
SC Circuit Judge Rules Civil Asset Forfeiture in SC Unconstitutional
Posted on 10/15/19 at 3:51 pm to TheRock
quote:
though black men make up just 13% of the state’s population.
Ummmm....that's a negative
Maybe they didn't include inmates in the correctional system.....just sayin'
Posted on 10/15/19 at 3:51 pm to TheRock
Good guy judge. frick that law.
Posted on 10/15/19 at 3:53 pm to SCLibertarian
quote:
This is my home county. I’ve appeared in front of Judge John many times. He’s a no-nonsense Citadel grad. Good for him.
Did you get a chance to read that series referenced in the article? It was damning stuff and really good work by the local paper.
quote:
Ummmm....that's a negative
The African-American population is about 27%, so it makes sense that black men only are at about 13%.
This post was edited on 10/15/19 at 3:56 pm
Posted on 10/15/19 at 3:57 pm to StealthCalais11
Prepare for the sheriff's association and other LE lobby groups in SC to fight tooth and nail to keep their right to legally steal from citizens.
This post was edited on 10/15/19 at 3:59 pm
Posted on 10/15/19 at 4:01 pm to jdd48
quote:
Prepare for the sheriff's association in SC to fight tooth and nail to keep their right to legally steal from citizens.
How do expect our baws in beige to operate without taking 10 thousand, I mean 5 thousand....or was it 1 thousand? in cash from these obvious criminals.
This post was edited on 10/15/19 at 4:01 pm
Posted on 10/15/19 at 4:02 pm to fr33manator
quote:
Should be unconstitutional everywhere
Posted on 10/15/19 at 4:15 pm to TheRock
quote:
someone was charged with a crime but not convicted.
I have never understood forfeiture without a conviction. I can see freezing with due process and with enough transparency that it can be seen if freezing is putting an undue burden on them or family to get them to plead guilty, but if no conviction forfeiture never made sense.
Like traffic tickets or fines I am not sure even valid forfeitures need to go back to law enforcement or department issuing respective fine. I think when departments benefit for basically doing their job it pushes inconsistent enforcement when funds are needed or to meet quotas when fines are built into budgets.
Posted on 10/15/19 at 4:20 pm to TheRock
They really have no choice now since the Supreme Court made their ruling. Fortune article:
LINK
"The Supreme Court ruled unanimously Wednesday to limit civil forfeiture laws that give state and local law enforcement the ability to seize property involved in crimes.
The move was made in a ruling that states the Eighth Amendment, which bars “excessive fines” on the federal level, also applies to state and local governments."
LINK
"The Supreme Court ruled unanimously Wednesday to limit civil forfeiture laws that give state and local law enforcement the ability to seize property involved in crimes.
The move was made in a ruling that states the Eighth Amendment, which bars “excessive fines” on the federal level, also applies to state and local governments."
This post was edited on 10/15/19 at 4:21 pm
Posted on 10/15/19 at 4:23 pm to fr33manator
quote:
Should be unconstitutional everywhere
It is but some jurisdictions haven't ruled on it and some have gotten the ruling incorrect.
Posted on 10/15/19 at 4:24 pm to TheRock
I bet there are some butt hurt police officers
Posted on 10/15/19 at 4:29 pm to TheRock
First Georgia, now CAF. South Carolina winning this week.
Posted on 10/15/19 at 4:30 pm to TheRock
The rare thing most people - left and right - agree on.
Popular
Back to top

17










