Started By
Message

re: SC Circuit Judge Rules Civil Asset Forfeiture in SC Unconstitutional

Posted on 11/3/19 at 8:35 am to
Posted by theGarnetWay
Washington, D.C.
Member since Mar 2010
27510 posts
Posted on 11/3/19 at 8:35 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 11/6/19 at 2:09 pm
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
124943 posts
Posted on 11/3/19 at 8:39 am to
Back the blue

If you ain’t guilty, why do you care?
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21842 posts
Posted on 11/3/19 at 8:43 am to
quote:

I have never understood forfeiture without a conviction


Because the case is against the property, not the owner. Your property has much fewer rights than you do (habeas corpus, presumption of innocence, right to counsel, to name a few).

Your property is presumed guilty until proven innocent.
Posted by N2cars
Member since Feb 2008
40333 posts
Posted on 11/3/19 at 9:26 am to



A thief with a badge and a gun is still thief.

These little shitass sheriff's offices and police forces have become hooked on OPM.


Other people's money.
Posted by ecb
Member since Jul 2010
10328 posts
Posted on 11/3/19 at 10:28 am to
Judge paid off by the Mob, what’s new?
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
62147 posts
Posted on 11/3/19 at 10:32 am to
Life, liberty and property , basic natural rights.
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
46425 posts
Posted on 11/3/19 at 10:37 am to
civil asset forfeiture is nothing more than theft under cover of law.
Posted by northLAgoomba
Grand Cane, LA
Member since Nov 2009
3979 posts
Posted on 11/3/19 at 10:44 am to
quote:

Nearly 800 times when police seized money or property, no related criminal charge was filed.

first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram