Started By
Message

re: San Diego teacher held at border patrol checkpoint refuses to answer questions

Posted on 7/25/17 at 10:24 am to
Posted by 14&Counting
Eugene, OR
Member since Jul 2012
37615 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 10:24 am to
quote:

I have no problem with the permanent checkpoints which is what was ruled on in Fuente. I understand the reasoning for Mobile Patrols. I do not like tactical checkpoints, because typically this is where some agents are alleged to be more "rogue" with their questioning and tactics (which is illegal). If you're arguing the original decision and standards and laws set-forth are unconstitutional I wholeheartedly disagree. If you want to argue that the overstepping and attempts to broaden authority not expressly given or even ones forbidden as your reasoning then I agree that infringes, but that's not what the original discussion was. The original discussion was that the stops were unconstitutional which they aren't. Now are there constitutional infringements made by agents at these stops when they go beyond what they are allowed to do by law? Absolutely


Good post and succinctly summarizes the issue.
Posted by Hat Tricks
Member since Oct 2003
28612 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 10:29 am to
quote:

Wow.


Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 10:29 am to
quote:

You do realize that the wall would stretch from the Gulf to the Pacific whereas the Maginot just ended on land? Pretty damn big difference.


You do realize Messicans know how to build boats?
Posted by ItTakesAThief
Scottsdale, Arizona
Member since Dec 2009
9191 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 10:31 am to
Should have told her she could stay in Mexico until she answered the questions and produced a passport.
Posted by MLCLyons
Member since Nov 2012
4709 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 10:58 am to
quote:

There's a nice and clean solution to border patrol checkpoints: build the wall.


HAHAHA. Yes no one will build tunnels underneath or climb over a wall. Cartels will likely start knocking sections down. The Maginot Line will likely be more successful than a border wall.

No to mention Trump already said the wall needs to have holes in it so we can see people throwing drugs over it...or, you know, passing them through the holes.
Posted by Five0
Member since Dec 2009
11354 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 11:20 am to
quote:

I don't even think the Border Patrol is allowed to require you to hand over "papers" proving citizenship. I think they're only allowed to ask. 


That is dumb as hell if true.
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51270 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 11:25 am to
quote:

quote:
I don't even think the Border Patrol is allowed to require you to hand over "papers" proving citizenship. I think they're only allowed to ask. 


quote:

That is dumb as hell if true.



They just ask and do a quick exterior visual inspection of the car.

Now, I don't know how easy it is for them to pull you over to secondary inspections though.

These interior checkpoints are all documented, listed on Wikipedia, and on Google Maps.
Posted by TigerstuckinMS
Member since Nov 2005
33687 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 11:27 am to
quote:

why would border patrol be looking for drugs 300 miles from the border?

Wait, do you think that there is no international border if there's not another country on the other side of it?

Lake Charles is less than 50 miles from the border. Pretty much all of Louisiana South of Alexandria lies within 100 miles of the U.S. border.
Posted by Oddibe
Close to some, further from others
Member since Sep 2015
6566 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 11:37 am to
quote:

Lake Charles is less than 50 miles from the border. Pretty much all of Louisiana South of Alexandria lies within 100 miles of the U.S. border.
If illegal immigrants are coming by boat into Lake Charles and other areas of south Louisiana, wouldn't the border patrol be better served working the different ports or main roads coming out of ports as opposed to sitting on I-10? I would rather see them in boats checking the coast than sitting in the middle of I-10 doing nothing.

What exactly are they looking at while sitting on I-10? Cars and buses with Mexican tags? IF that is the case they are over 400 miles away from where they crossed the border.
Posted by TigerstuckinMS
Member since Nov 2005
33687 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 11:42 am to
quote:

If illegal immigrants are coming by boat into Lake Charles and other areas of south Louisiana, wouldn't the border patrol be better served working the different ports or main roads coming out of ports as opposed to sitting on I-10? I would rather see them in boats checking the coast than sitting in the middle of I-10 doing nothing.

What exactly are they looking at while sitting on I-10? Cars and buses with Mexican tags? IF that is the case they are over 400 miles away from where they crossed the border.

I was responding to your assertion that Lake Charles is over 300 miles from the border. Man, those goalposts sure are speedy.
Posted by SeeeeK
some where
Member since Sep 2012
28050 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 11:45 am to
Liberalism is a mental disorder
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134856 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 11:50 am to
I went through a BP checkpoint in AZ with a Canadian guy I was working with and he was freaking out because his papers were in the back with his bags. I told him, "You're white, so just tell them you're American. Just make sure you don't say the word 'about'."

Worked like a charm.
Posted by Five0
Member since Dec 2009
11354 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 11:51 am to
quote:

Just make sure you don't say the word 'about'."


And I spit out coffee.
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
39575 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 11:56 am to
quote:

Yeah, I gotta agree with her here. Most people here love the second amendment but I'm a much bigger fan of the fourth. I hate Terry stops and my biggest professional goal is to take a case to the Supreme Court to overturn K9's being used to establish probable cause for a vehicle search


I can only surmise by the amount of votes on this post without a response that there are a hefty amount of people who have no idea what you're talking about or why it is important.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134856 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 11:58 am to
quote:

HAHAHA. Yes no one will build tunnels underneath or climb over a wall. Cartels will likely start knocking sections down. The Maginot Line will likely be more successful than a border wall.

True. I've been through plenty of checkpoints in areas where there's a wall in place and seen bricks of drugs lined up outside a car that went through the checkpoint.
quote:

No to mention Trump already said the wall needs to have holes in it so we can see people throwing drugs over it...or, you know, passing them through the holes.

The wall is already "see through"
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
20886 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

.. I still agree with the agents , and to me it isn't a lot different that being asked for license and registration; except the consequences of getting caught if she was an illegal alien


Except its their burden to prove you arent a citizen. Remaining silent is the right of every American Citizen. I'm curious what reasonable suspicion they had to detain her for. "Looking like an alien" isnt RS.
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
20886 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

Yeah, I gotta agree with her here. Most people here love the second amendment but I'm a much bigger fan of the fourth.

I hate Terry stops and my biggest professional goal is to take a case to the Supreme Court to overturn K9's being used to establish probable cause for a vehicle search.


The OT isnt a fan of asserting your rights. They'd rather waive all rights without a fuss to make sure the officer/agent has a good day.

"Just do what they say and no one gets hurt" -the OT.
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
20886 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

was responding to your assertion that Lake Charles is over 300 miles from the border. Man, those goalposts sure are speedy.


Its always interesting when people find out the BP has jurisdiction within 100 of ALL borders, land and water.
Posted by northshorebamaman
Cochise County AZ
Member since Jul 2009
35476 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

Yeah, that is an attention seeker. Not sure why people won't answer a simple question, especially when they know that will let them pass. Morons.

I wouldn't do it because I'm lazy and usually just try to get along but I'm glad there are people out there who don't mind going out of there way to challenge the ever-growing power of the federal government. What's the point of having a right if no one ever exercises it? And bottom line, she has a point, no matter how annoying it may be.
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
76518 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 12:28 pm to
quote:



Its always interesting when people find out the BP has jurisdiction within 100 of ALL borders, land and water.


If they included international airports as was mentioned they're trying to do, there would hardly be any land left that isn't, if any.

It's not funny but just so ridiculous you have to laugh.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram