- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Roe v Wade officially overturned
Posted on 6/24/22 at 3:40 pm to SoonerK
Posted on 6/24/22 at 3:40 pm to SoonerK
quote:
I am not trying to take you anywhere. Not everyone on this board has ulterior motives in a discussion. I am just not on board that every "right" has to be explicitly spelled out in the Constitution.
Any state that wants to keep abortion legal will still be able to. Your right to kill your own children is not being taken away federally
Posted on 6/24/22 at 3:42 pm to gaetti15
quote:
Undercover: "It's in there somewhere dammit"
Is it the position of the conservative legal establishment that the plain text Ninth Amendment doesn’t exist?
The question was asked “where in the Constitution is abortion a right?”
1) The Ninth Amendment says that unenumerated rights exist and they are given the same weight as enumerated ones.
2) English common law, which rolled over into American common law, recognized first trimester abortions as a legal right.
3) If there exists unenumerated rights and if the Founders’ original views of such rights hold substantial weight as to how we interpret such rights, then yes, there is a cogent legal argument that the Constitution enshrines such rights and that first trimester abortion would be such a right.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 3:43 pm to FredBear
quote:
Any state that wants to keep abortion legal will still be able to. Your right to kill your own children is not being taken away federally
I am not specifically talking about abortion. I am talking about the view that every "right" needs to be spelled out in the Constitution.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 3:43 pm to UndercoverBryologist
quote:
The question was asked “where in the Constitution is abortion a right?”
And the answer is it isn't. That was fun.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 3:44 pm to LNCHBOX
Well, the BOR has become a joke as well. Agree?
Posted on 6/24/22 at 3:44 pm to Sao
quote:
Well, the BOR has become a joke as well. Agree?
Just say what you want to say.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 3:44 pm to FredBear
I much prefer the federal government's rights to be exhaustively enumerated.
Individual rights were never meant to be, so that is either a misunderstanding on your part, or a straw man.
Individual rights were never meant to be, so that is either a misunderstanding on your part, or a straw man.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 3:46 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
And the answer is it isn't. That was fun.
Repeal the Ninth Amendment then, because it says that enumeration does not matter with regards to personal Liberty. The constitution protects both enumerated and unenumerated rights.
And as understood at the founding in the Common Law, first trimester abortions were a right.
This post was edited on 6/24/22 at 3:48 pm
Posted on 6/24/22 at 3:47 pm to UndercoverBryologist
quote:
Repeal the Ninth Amendment then
I'm good.
quote:
And as understand at the founding in the Common Law, first trimester abortions were a right.
If you say so. But not really though.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 3:49 pm to UndercoverBryologist
You think you scored a gotcha, dontcha? You ran here gleefully to display your pseudo-intellect and preen with all the praise you were sure was going to come, didn't you?
Since the child is a living human being, I believe his or her right to life supercedes any right that you strained to fabricate the mother has to murder it.
Since the child is a living human being, I believe his or her right to life supercedes any right that you strained to fabricate the mother has to murder it.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 3:49 pm to GRTiger
quote:
I much prefer the federal government's rights to be exhaustively enumerated.
That’s a position I can respect, if not share. The problem, from your position, is that the Ninth Amendment says enumeration itself doesn’t matter.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 3:51 pm to UndercoverBryologist
quote:
And as understood at the founding in the Common Law, first trimester abortions were a right.
once again read the Supreme Court decision, it has an extensive history section in it. (something Roe and Casey did NOT have)
This post was edited on 6/24/22 at 3:52 pm
Posted on 6/24/22 at 3:51 pm to Sao
quote:
He's good
I'm better than some clown that came to this thread to push some bullshite interpretation that doesn't jive with what the court says.
Better than you too
This post was edited on 6/24/22 at 3:52 pm
Posted on 6/24/22 at 3:52 pm to UndercoverBryologist
quote:
Repeal the Ninth Amendment then, because it says that enumeration does not matter with regards to personal Liberty. The constitution protects both enumerated and unenumerated rights.
And as understood at the founding in the Common Law, first trimester abortions were a right.
Don't you find it rather odd that no actual constitutional legal scholars out there are making this argument?
Posted on 6/24/22 at 3:57 pm to SoFla Tideroller
quote:
Since the child is a living human being, I believe his or her right to life supercedes any right that you strained to fabricate the mother has to murder it.
Except that even murder is legal in the case of self defense.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 3:57 pm to gaetti15
quote:
once again read the Supreme Court decision, it has an extensive history section in it. (something Roe and Casey did NOT have)
I know. Alito cites Blackstone’s view that the abortion of a “quick child” (i.e. later than first trimester) is murder and should be treated differently than the abortion of a pre-quick child. As I said, the common law at the time recognized this distinction.
Popular
Back to top



3





