- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 6/24/22 at 3:12 pm to Sao
quote:
So, what do you want to talk about? Me, or the issues?
You're the one that brought yourself back up, dummy.
This post was edited on 6/24/22 at 3:12 pm
Posted on 6/24/22 at 3:12 pm to OweO
Your first and last paragraphs contradict each other but that’s no surprise
Posted on 6/24/22 at 3:12 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
LNCHBOX
Are you this big of a dick IRL? I’ve never seen you be able to carry on anything that resembles a debate without commenting on the persons past posts or just calling them names. Isn’t it exhausting just going around insulting anyone with a slightly different view than you?
Posted on 6/24/22 at 3:12 pm to olddawg26
quote:
Are you this big of a dick IRL? I’ve never seen you be able to carry on anything that resembles a debate without commenting on the persons past posts or just calling them names. Isn’t it exhausting just going around insulting anyone with a slightly different view than you?
Especially funny since you don't seem to mind Sao calling me names and you responded to a post where I didn't call anyone a name.
This post was edited on 6/24/22 at 3:14 pm
Posted on 6/24/22 at 3:14 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
You're the one that brought yourself back up, dummy.
You're inability to follow a dialogue is amusing.
Here, I'll quote you verbatim if rhat helps
quote:
Centrist Sao keeping it in the middle
This post was edited on 6/24/22 at 3:16 pm
Posted on 6/24/22 at 3:15 pm to Centinel
quote:
When it comes to individual rights, yes. Otherwise it resides at the states.
There's a reason why a woman's right to vote only became nation-wide after the 19th. Up until that point, women voting was a state-level issue
Hypothetically speaking of course, what year would the U.S. have passed an Amendment to the Constitution banning segregation in the United States if the Supreme Court did not intervene.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 3:15 pm to Weekend Warrior79
No because the original decision was based on false pretenses. This ruling has more to do with state’s rights than abortion.
Some states will make it legal the majority won’t. If a person doesn’t agree with the individual state decision they have free will to move to a state more befitting their beliefs.
Over time the people who want abortions will migrate to states that allow it. People who live in states tha make it legal to states where it is illegal.
There is no law that prevents moving between states so people can exercise their free will to live where they see fit
Some states will make it legal the majority won’t. If a person doesn’t agree with the individual state decision they have free will to move to a state more befitting their beliefs.
Over time the people who want abortions will migrate to states that allow it. People who live in states tha make it legal to states where it is illegal.
There is no law that prevents moving between states so people can exercise their free will to live where they see fit
Posted on 6/24/22 at 3:16 pm to Sao
quote:
You're inability to follow a dialogue is amusing.
No one was talking about you since 2:34. You inserted yourself back in. I followed it just fine.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 3:16 pm to LNCHBOX
Posted on 6/24/22 at 3:17 pm to Sao
I wouldn't try to make an actual response too.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 3:17 pm to Pettifogger
quote:all of saos time on texags is finally starting to turn him
TBH I can't tell if he's inviting you to Sonic or being homoerotic
Posted on 6/24/22 at 3:18 pm to LNCHBOX
If you’re looking for a person that resorts to name calling and using previous posts out of context, there is a amazing technology that makes it easy for you. It’s called a mirror!
Posted on 6/24/22 at 3:18 pm to MEd LSU
quote:
If you’re looking for a person that resorts to name calling and using previous posts out of context, there is a amazing technology that makes it easy for you. It’s called a mirror!
Good one.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 3:18 pm to shaquilleoatmeal
quote:
the answer is to allow women to abort
Because that has done wonders for the poverty stricken class of the United States for so long
Posted on 6/24/22 at 3:20 pm to Cosmo
1. Bolster state's rights
2. Reduce purple states
3. Stir economic movement
4. Happier people, happier country
This is the way
2. Reduce purple states
3. Stir economic movement
4. Happier people, happier country
This is the way
Posted on 6/24/22 at 3:21 pm to mmmmmbeeer
All this talk of bodily autonomy...
Where were you clowns the last year with all of the vaccine mandates?
Everyone that is "pro-choice", but sided with the government over vaccine mandates can suck my arse. If I was in charge, I would drop you from a helicopter to see if you could fly.
Where were you clowns the last year with all of the vaccine mandates?
Everyone that is "pro-choice", but sided with the government over vaccine mandates can suck my arse. If I was in charge, I would drop you from a helicopter to see if you could fly.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 3:22 pm to SoonerK
quote:
Hypothetically speaking of course, what year would the U.S. have passed an Amendment to the Constitution banning segregation in the United States if the Supreme Court did not intervene.
You really can't compare those. The Brown decision was dealing with a pre-existing constitutional right.
The court didn't make up a right. The right already existed in the Constitution.
Good example of the problem with stare decisis though.
This post was edited on 6/24/22 at 3:23 pm
Posted on 6/24/22 at 3:25 pm to Ronaldo Burgundiaz
quote:
If I was in charge, I would drop you from a helicopter to see if you could fly.
I believe it was Reagan that said if not for double standards, the left would have no standards at all.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 3:26 pm to Centinel
quote:
You really can't compare those. The Brown decision was dealing with a pre-existing constitutional right.
The court didn't make up a right. The right already existed in the Constitution.
Good example of the problem with stare decisis though.
Which right?
Page 40 of 64
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News