- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Rittenhouse NOT GUILTY on all counts; concern over violence and riots growing
Posted on 11/19/21 at 1:11 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 11/19/21 at 1:11 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Faith in humanity slightly restored.
Well lets wait until the protests, that are coming soon, are over with before we determine that.
Posted on 11/19/21 at 1:12 pm to lsufb1912
Let's not forget the victims

Posted on 11/19/21 at 1:13 pm to member12
Imagine Kyle plugging a few more creeps the same day he is acquitted.
Rit-ten-house!
frick Yeah!
Rit-ten-house!
frick Yeah!
Posted on 11/19/21 at 1:13 pm to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
quote:
don't disagree with the not guilty verdict, but I do wonder why the weapons charge got thrown out.
Because he wasn’t guilty of it.
More precisely, what they were attempting to charge him with there was deemed not even to be a crime.
Posted on 11/19/21 at 1:13 pm to whatiknowsofar
quote:
The law is contradicted by the statute.
By which statute?
Posted on 11/19/21 at 1:13 pm to fr33manator
quote:
This makes me feel like writing a song.
“If You See Kyle.”
I actually had this song in my head earlier. Could easily substitute Kyle for Bill or Phil.
Don't mess with Phil
Posted on 11/19/21 at 1:14 pm to Y.A. Tittle
Ready to blow
more pedophiles
away now
more pedophiles
away now
Posted on 11/19/21 at 1:16 pm to whatiknowsofar
quote:'
The law I've Googled said 21
I would suggest not being a google attorney. My 8 year old soon will be legally carrying his shotgun this weekend.
Posted on 11/19/21 at 1:19 pm to whatiknowsofar
Here's the statute if you would like to read it for yourself:
Wisc. RS 948.60
Here's the relevant portion:
Wisc. RS 948.60
Here's the relevant portion:
quote:
(1) In this section, “dangerous weapon" means any firearm, loaded or unloaded; any electric weapon, as defined in s. 941.295 (1c) (a); metallic knuckles or knuckles of any substance which could be put to the same use with the same or similar effect as metallic knuckles; a nunchaku or any similar weapon consisting of 2 sticks of wood, plastic or metal connected at one end by a length of rope, chain, wire or leather; a cestus or similar material weighted with metal or other substance and worn on the hand; a shuriken or any similar pointed star-like object intended to injure a person when thrown; or a manrikigusari or similar length of chain having weighted ends.
(2)
(a) Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.
(b) Except as provided in par. (c), any person who intentionally sells, loans or gives a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age is guilty of a Class I felony.
(c) Whoever violates par. (b) is guilty of a Class H felony if the person under 18 years of age under par. (b) discharges the firearm and the discharge causes death to himself, herself or another.
(d) A person under 17 years of age who has violated this subsection is subject to the provisions of ch. 938 unless jurisdiction is waived under s. 938.18 or the person is subject to the jurisdiction of a court of criminal jurisdiction under s. 938.183.
(3)
(a) This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon when the dangerous weapon is being used in target practice under the supervision of an adult or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the supervision of an adult. This section does not apply to an adult who transfers a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age for use only in target practice under the adult's supervision or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the adult's supervision.
(b) This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who is a member of the armed forces or national guard and who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon in the line of duty. This section does not apply to an adult who is a member of the armed forces or national guard and who transfers a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age in the line of duty.
(c) This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593. This section applies only to an adult who transfers a firearm to a person under 18 years of age if the person under 18 years of age is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593 or to an adult who is in violation of s. 941.28.
Posted on 11/19/21 at 1:21 pm to chadau79
quote:
My 8 year old soon will be legally carrying his shotgun this weekend.
Federal laws are different than state laws. Purchasing firearms laws are different than possessing firearms laws. Minors having a firearm while accompanied by their parent or another adult is different than a minor possessing a firearm while alone. So many people have been talking about this the whole case without specifying what statute they think he did or didn't violate.
Posted on 11/19/21 at 1:21 pm to whatiknowsofar
quote:
I don't disagree with the not guilty verdict, but I do wonder why the weapons charge got thrown out.
Because it's legal for a 17 y/o to possess a long gun in WI.
The prosecutor apparently didn't know the difference between a rifle and a SBR.

Posted on 11/19/21 at 1:23 pm to 19
quote:
Imagine Kyle plugging a few more creeps the same day he is acquitted.
When does he get his firearm back?
Posted on 11/19/21 at 1:23 pm to Tarik One
quote:
A lot of predictable comments from you hillbillies
if you endorsed a conviction here, you are basically endorsing a witch trial based on emotions and not the facts of the case

Posted on 11/19/21 at 1:23 pm to whatiknowsofar
quote:
The law I've Googled said 21
It helps if you read the entire statute, and not the parts that reaffirm your personal beliefs.
Posted on 11/19/21 at 1:24 pm to member12
Kyle Rittenhouse for sheriff!!
Protecting the home’s and innocent by getting rid of garbage
Posted on 11/19/21 at 1:25 pm to whatiknowsofar
quote:
I don't disagree with the not guilty verdict, but I do wonder why the weapons charge got thrown out.
Because he broke no laws. Jesus, you lefties are slow.
Posted on 11/19/21 at 1:26 pm to LNCHBOX
About time we see some real justice
Posted on 11/19/21 at 1:28 pm to Centinel
Yes. In denial. He can’t figure out why what he wanted to happen...didn’t happen. LOL
Popular
Back to top
