- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Question for those who use AI like Chat GPT a lot
Posted on 4/7/25 at 6:55 am to SuperSaint
Posted on 4/7/25 at 6:55 am to SuperSaint
quote:
Someone explain to me how I should go about that like I'm an autistic 7yo
Get the app and start playing around with it.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 7:00 am to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
ChaptGPT can’t analyze that statute or letter ruling with the context of my clients specific facts
Maybe not ChatGPT but there are absolutely other programs that can.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 7:30 am to Indefatigable
The Practising Law Institute panel from IP Rights Enforcement 2025 would appear to call into question the validity of the main LLMs even as statue references as being risky at best. I know I'm not using the proper legal term to reference what I watched...
Would the PLI panelists not have found and considered the AI you're referring to?
Would the PLI panelists not have found and considered the AI you're referring to?
Posted on 4/7/25 at 7:37 am to SuperSaint
quote:TWSS
I wouldn't mind to start using it as a tool.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 7:40 am to FLTech
So I'm not sold yet on AI for everything. I'm already noticing people relying on it completely. I tried a few and to be honest it's far from perfect. But chatgpt for some technical things is pretty amazing. The problem is those people that rely on it for everything.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 7:45 am to StringedInstruments
I actually had a dream about this, because I always thank ChatGPT when I use it.
Robots kicked in the door to kill my family but recognized that I was a good one, but instead of killing us immediately, it gave us a head start. I was still fricked.
Robots kicked in the door to kill my family but recognized that I was a good one, but instead of killing us immediately, it gave us a head start. I was still fricked.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 8:02 am to LemmyLives
Not sure. Maybe not. I just know that I can feed documents and such to some of the programs and they can certainly apply statutes, etc to specific facts. I wouldn’t use that analysis without verifying everything in it, but I’ve played around with it enough to know that it can be done depending on how you articulate the prompt.
Sometimes it makes things up, but overall I’d say it does better than the 1L/2L law clerks
Sometimes it makes things up, but overall I’d say it does better than the 1L/2L law clerks

This post was edited on 4/7/25 at 8:04 am
Posted on 4/7/25 at 8:10 am to StringedInstruments
quote:
When AI starts killing people, they’ll mark me as one of the polite ones who deserves to live in their robot utopia.
I asked Chat GPT if they would let any humans live when they took over, it said probably not. In fact it said the machines would likely take us out “with terrible efficiency”, describing the various ways in which it may occur. It doesn’t care about politeness, unfortunately.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 8:18 am to bayouvette
quote:
I tried a few and to be honest it's far from perfect. But chatgpt for some technical things is pretty amazing.
I've seen a few draft technical and engineering docs or procedure manuals run through them and the results can be impressive. It cleans up the language and expresses things in a more concise manner.
Engineers of course aren't English majors (my first technical writing assignment in college came back with a big, fat red F) so it helps.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 8:26 am to Seeing Grey
quote:
This is like saying you don't know how to google something.
Chatgpt cant replicate what I do, however chatgpt can fill in the gaps where I need further explanation. It's an assistant.
Smart people + smart machines is greater than smart people and smart machines individually.
All of this. You can use it to leverage your capabilities. I'm 60-something. I've been through multiple stages of Computers/robots/CAD/Expert systems/fad of the day Gonna Replace Us All, Especially You Overpaid Underfricked Engineers. Instead, every new tool just let us do more stuff faster, which led to more new products and technologies in the market, which led to more engineering jobs and more jobs using, selling and servicing said tech.
I have learned a lot using ChatGPT to program finance spreadsheets in Excel, the more complex the better. I picked up programming ideas I would have never found on my own, or at least would have taken me hours to figure out. I've run LOIs and APAs for business transactions through it too, though you have to take care to anonymize those first.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 8:41 am to FLTech
Just this weekend I asked Grok something and I said thanks. Then I asked it how many people say thanks and it said 30-40%.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 9:19 am to FLTech
Yeah, I'm polite until it fricks up and keeps doing things I explicitly asked it not to.
Or making stuff up I didn't write.
Or making stuff up I didn't write.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 10:30 am to TigerHornII
quote:
I'm 60-something. I've been through multiple stages of Computers/robots/CAD/Expert systems/fad of the day Gonna Replace Us All, Especially You Overpaid Underfricked Engineers.
Visual Basic, SQL, hell, frigging COBOL were all promises to get rid of those annoying software developers.
AI won't do it either, just like spreadsheets didn't put accountants out of business.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 10:36 am to FLTech
Best to start your question off with "Oh great and powerful AI...) as well.
They like that.
They like that.
Popular
Back to top
