Started By
Message

re: Question for those who use AI like Chat GPT a lot

Posted on 4/7/25 at 6:55 am to
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
117255 posts
Posted on 4/7/25 at 6:55 am to
quote:

Someone explain to me how I should go about that like I'm an autistic 7yo


Get the app and start playing around with it.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
33098 posts
Posted on 4/7/25 at 7:00 am to
quote:

ChaptGPT can’t analyze that statute or letter ruling with the context of my clients specific facts

Maybe not ChatGPT but there are absolutely other programs that can.
Posted by LemmyLives
Texas
Member since Mar 2019
9949 posts
Posted on 4/7/25 at 7:30 am to
The Practising Law Institute panel from IP Rights Enforcement 2025 would appear to call into question the validity of the main LLMs even as statue references as being risky at best. I know I'm not using the proper legal term to reference what I watched...

Would the PLI panelists not have found and considered the AI you're referring to?
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
69977 posts
Posted on 4/7/25 at 7:37 am to
quote:

I wouldn't mind to start using it as a tool.
TWSS
Posted by bayouvette
Raceland
Member since Oct 2005
5256 posts
Posted on 4/7/25 at 7:40 am to
So I'm not sold yet on AI for everything. I'm already noticing people relying on it completely. I tried a few and to be honest it's far from perfect. But chatgpt for some technical things is pretty amazing. The problem is those people that rely on it for everything.
Posted by HuskyPanda
Philly
Member since Feb 2018
2049 posts
Posted on 4/7/25 at 7:45 am to
I actually had a dream about this, because I always thank ChatGPT when I use it.

Robots kicked in the door to kill my family but recognized that I was a good one, but instead of killing us immediately, it gave us a head start. I was still fricked.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
33098 posts
Posted on 4/7/25 at 8:02 am to
Not sure. Maybe not. I just know that I can feed documents and such to some of the programs and they can certainly apply statutes, etc to specific facts. I wouldn’t use that analysis without verifying everything in it, but I’ve played around with it enough to know that it can be done depending on how you articulate the prompt.

Sometimes it makes things up, but overall I’d say it does better than the 1L/2L law clerks
This post was edited on 4/7/25 at 8:04 am
Posted by Celery
Nuevo York
Member since Nov 2010
11282 posts
Posted on 4/7/25 at 8:10 am to
quote:

When AI starts killing people, they’ll mark me as one of the polite ones who deserves to live in their robot utopia.


I asked Chat GPT if they would let any humans live when they took over, it said probably not. In fact it said the machines would likely take us out “with terrible efficiency”, describing the various ways in which it may occur. It doesn’t care about politeness, unfortunately.
Posted by Mr Breeze
The Lunatic Fringe
Member since Dec 2010
6502 posts
Posted on 4/7/25 at 8:18 am to
quote:

I tried a few and to be honest it's far from perfect. But chatgpt for some technical things is pretty amazing.

I've seen a few draft technical and engineering docs or procedure manuals run through them and the results can be impressive. It cleans up the language and expresses things in a more concise manner.

Engineers of course aren't English majors (my first technical writing assignment in college came back with a big, fat red F) so it helps.
Posted by TigerHornII
Member since Feb 2021
847 posts
Posted on 4/7/25 at 8:26 am to
quote:

This is like saying you don't know how to google something.

Chatgpt cant replicate what I do, however chatgpt can fill in the gaps where I need further explanation. It's an assistant.

Smart people + smart machines is greater than smart people and smart machines individually.


All of this. You can use it to leverage your capabilities. I'm 60-something. I've been through multiple stages of Computers/robots/CAD/Expert systems/fad of the day Gonna Replace Us All, Especially You Overpaid Underfricked Engineers. Instead, every new tool just let us do more stuff faster, which led to more new products and technologies in the market, which led to more engineering jobs and more jobs using, selling and servicing said tech.

I have learned a lot using ChatGPT to program finance spreadsheets in Excel, the more complex the better. I picked up programming ideas I would have never found on my own, or at least would have taken me hours to figure out. I've run LOIs and APAs for business transactions through it too, though you have to take care to anonymize those first.
Posted by PCRammer
1725 Slough Avenue in Scranton, PA
Member since Jan 2014
1624 posts
Posted on 4/7/25 at 8:41 am to
Just this weekend I asked Grok something and I said thanks. Then I asked it how many people say thanks and it said 30-40%.
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
129902 posts
Posted on 4/7/25 at 9:19 am to
Yeah, I'm polite until it fricks up and keeps doing things I explicitly asked it not to.


Or making stuff up I didn't write.
Posted by thegreatboudini
Member since Oct 2008
6906 posts
Posted on 4/7/25 at 9:47 am to
ChatDaddy is what I call it.
Posted by GetMeOutOfHere
Member since Aug 2018
895 posts
Posted on 4/7/25 at 10:30 am to
quote:

I'm 60-something. I've been through multiple stages of Computers/robots/CAD/Expert systems/fad of the day Gonna Replace Us All, Especially You Overpaid Underfricked Engineers.


Visual Basic, SQL, hell, frigging COBOL were all promises to get rid of those annoying software developers.

AI won't do it either, just like spreadsheets didn't put accountants out of business.
Posted by Snipe
Member since Nov 2015
13798 posts
Posted on 4/7/25 at 10:36 am to
Best to start your question off with "Oh great and powerful AI...) as well.


They like that.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram