re: Project Veritas releases more footage from Pfizer R&D director meeting

Based on the interviewee’s mannerisms, I think we know exactly what the interviewer had to do. At least there is one on our side for once.

quote:

---

It’s not that hard for a company like Pfizer to scrub an employee from the internet

---

Pfizer cannot unsee what has been seen.

quote:

---

Thanks Trump

---

As a Trump voter, I agree. This "vaccine" has been a disaster and he needs to distance himself from it if that's possible.

Has Pfizer denied Walker employment there and position? I haven't seen anything and if he didn't work there, that's the first thing they would do. Here's their response published on their website:

quote:

---

New York, N.Y., January 27, 2023 – Allegations have recently been made related to gain of function and directed evolution research at Pfizer and the company would like to set the record straight.

In the ongoing development of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, Pfizer has not conducted gain of function or directed evolution research. Working with collaborators, we have conducted research where the original SARS-CoV-2 virus has been used to express the spike protein from new variants of concern. This work is undertaken once a new variant of concern has been identified by public health authorities. This research provides a way for us to rapidly assess the ability of an existing vaccine to induce antibodies that neutralize a newly identified variant of concern. We then make this data available through peer reviewed scientific journals and use it as one of the steps to determine whether a vaccine update is required.

In addition, to meet U.S. and global regulatory requirements for our oral treatment, PAXLOVID™, Pfizer undertakes in vitro work (e.g., in a laboratory culture dish) to identify potential resistance mutations to nirmatrelvir, one of PAXLOVID’s two components. With a naturally evolving virus, it is important to routinely assess the activity of an antiviral. Most of this work is conducted using computer simulations or mutations of the main protease–a non-infectious part of the virus. In a limited number of cases when a full virus does not contain any known gain of function mutations, such virus may be engineered to enable the assessment of antiviral activity in cells. In addition, in vitro resistance selection experiments are undertaken in cells incubated with SARS-CoV-2 and nirmatrelvir in our secure Biosafety level 3 (BSL3) laboratory to assess whether the main protease can mutate to yield resistant strains of the virus. It is important to note that these studies are required by U.S. and global regulators for all antiviral products and are carried out by many companies and academic institutions in the U.S. and around the world.

Fact-based information rooted in sound science is vitally important to overcoming the COVID-19 pandemic and Pfizer remains committed to transparency and helping alleviate the devastating burden of this disease.

---

Oh and here's a link: Pfizer

quote:

---

Wow, a linkedin profile. What about his TikTok and Instagram pages? You would think he would be mentioned in a multitude if articles, news releases, etc in the past. That's a high profile position to not have anything written about you anywhere.

---

Have you read any articles about the VP of R&D for Moderna, Teva, GSK, or Novartis? Do you know any of their names?

quote:

---

Cause no one else is doing investigative journalism anymore, 

---

The MSM / social media investigates ways to block/cover up the truth, and cash checks - from pharma and the cdc.

quote:

---

. I hope we don’t find out that somehow this mRNA lingers in the body and like -- because it has to be affecting something hormonal to impact menstrual cycles.”

---

Early conspiracy theory that the vaccine’s true goal was population control

[FACT] not fact

quote:

---

And so the conspiracy begins...

---

I mean there is a guy on video saying all this shite, and definitely appeared genuinely upset when he found out he was being recorded. I understand being skeptical but I don’t see how the burden of proof is on those taking the video that they see with their eyes for exactly what it is.

PV targets people and gets them to talk, do they have a history of faking peoples identities?

quote:

---

PV targets people and gets them to talk, do they have a history of faking peoples identities?

---

They have a history of releasing only the parts of videos that fit their narrative and agenda. In many cases once the full video with full context is released, it’s evident they made a mountain out of a mole hill. The Planned Parenthood “sting”, the CNN story, and others I’m forgetting.

There are enough shady incidents involving them to take all of their initial reports with a huge grain of salt, but y’all do what you wanna do. I don’t trust them any more than I trust the major media outlets, which isn’t much.