Started By
Message

re: Project Veritas releases more footage from Pfizer R&D director meeting

Posted on 2/3/23 at 9:20 am to
Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
30545 posts
Posted on 2/3/23 at 9:20 am to
quote:

Has Pfizer denied Walker employment there and position?

Not that I’ve seen. All I’m saying is that LinkedIn profile is fake. But he may or may not be employed there. Not a lot of good evidence one way or the other
Posted by boxcarbarney
Above all things, be a man
Member since Jul 2007
22714 posts
Posted on 2/3/23 at 9:29 am to
Yall can stop replying to Zappa now. He won't be back in this thread.
Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
30545 posts
Posted on 2/3/23 at 9:31 am to
quote:

He’s not the head of R&D, has no decision making power, and in his particular role likely has less influence in that organization vs employees at a similar level.

This is probably the case. Again, that LinkedIn profile is fake. But yea probably a fake title or inflated title and no real influence or serious knowledge of Pfizer’s R&D. GOF research is illegal in the US and I don’t believe Pfizer is doing true GOF research. Modeling and theoretical stuff yes, not actual viral changes

Gonna get downvotes though for being middle of the road here
Posted by foosball
Member since Nov 2021
1886 posts
Posted on 2/3/23 at 9:44 am to
quote:

Again, that LinkedIn profile is fake.


You’re saying this because his LinkedIn only had 9 followers? There’s a difference between connections and followers. He’s only been in Pharma for 2-3 years with limited publishing experience. 9 followers sounds about right to me

Are you telling me the Microsoft Teams screenshot is a fake as well?
This post was edited on 2/3/23 at 9:46 am
Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
68444 posts
Posted on 2/3/23 at 9:52 am to
quote:

How does veritas continue to get these opportunities?



So gay men are still horny and simp just like straight men. Its prob actually so much easier to lure these gay dudes on dates. Like super easy.

Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
30545 posts
Posted on 2/3/23 at 9:53 am to
quote:

You’re saying this because his LinkedIn only had 9 followers? There’s a difference between connections and followers. He’s only been in Pharma for 2-3 years with limited publishing experience. 9 followers sounds about right to me Are you telling me the Microsoft Teams screenshot is a fake as well?

Combination of 9 followers plus the resume is bogus. Those positions don’t make any sense to result in his current position

And just as further evidence of why it’s bogus, the guy has an MD but has it nowhere on his LinkedIn account? Extremely suspect. Everyone with an MD or a PHD makes it very very clear
This post was edited on 2/3/23 at 9:57 am
Posted by Gifman
by the mountains
Member since Jan 2021
9236 posts
Posted on 2/3/23 at 9:58 am to
quote:

This is probably the case. Again, that LinkedIn profile is fake. But yea probably a fake title or inflated title and no real influence or serious knowledge of Pfizer’s R&D. GOF research is illegal in the US and I don’t believe Pfizer is doing true GOF research. Modeling and theoretical stuff yes, not actual viral changes




Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
68444 posts
Posted on 2/3/23 at 9:59 am to
quote:

And just as further evidence of why it’s bogus, the guy has an MD but has it nowhere on his LinkedIn account? Extremely suspect. Everyone with an MD or a PHD makes it very very clear



I thougt i saw where he was licensed in NY.

But okay lets say its bogus, crazy how easy it is to fake being a doctor.


now go get your Jabs....

-Bill Gates, not a doctor
This post was edited on 2/3/23 at 10:00 am
Posted by foosball
Member since Nov 2021
1886 posts
Posted on 2/3/23 at 10:05 am to
quote:

Combination of 9 followers plus the resume is bogus. Those positions don’t make any sense to result in his current position


Let’s just say both the LinkedIn screenshot and the cached search results from bing, brave, etc are fake. You still have the Teams screenshots showing his supervisors and colleagues.

As for how he got the job, I think you underestimate the quotas these companies are forced to abide by. And Director isn’t a management position, so it’s not really a stretch.
Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
30545 posts
Posted on 2/3/23 at 10:20 am to
quote:

Let’s just say both the LinkedIn screenshot and the cached search results from bing, brave, etc are fake.

I think the cached results are real and the pictured profile is fake. He has MD as part of his name or title in the cached results, but it’s nowhere to be found in that profile screenshot. I think someone tried to recreate his profile on LinkedIn and did a poor job
quote:

As for how he got the job, I think you underestimate the quotas these companies are forced to abide by. And Director isn’t a management position, so it’s not really a stretch.

Directors are normally upper management positions
But anyway I found an article proving he did work at BCG as a consultant, doing Covid 19 related work
LINK
So his resume seems valid, assuming he works at Pfizer now
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
62854 posts
Posted on 2/3/23 at 10:34 am to
I don't think anyone is interested in what influence he has at the company. It's clear he isn't making the decisions he's talking about, otherwise he'd probably not be so open about it just to get some arse.

If he's in the room, his words mean something. It would be a weird thing to lie about in pretty much any context, but people are weird. I assume some amount of truth to his words, and what he said is at least enough to investigate it further. The very notion of an investigation seems to set off some folks for some odd reason. Is ignorance bliss in this case? Or is it being taken as an assault on the ego of people who dove all in on the vaccine? There shouldn't be very many people outside of politicians and the company and maybe some investors who should be upset at the demand for more data and more transparency.
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
52765 posts
Posted on 2/3/23 at 10:36 am to
quote:

The initial videos were presented as PP doing something nefarious, when what they were doing is legal.


Just because it's legal, doesn't mean it's not nefarious. And the reason it was posted because the pro-abortion crowd kept on claiming that body parts weren't even visible during an abortion among other things.

What they showed was horrific. Actual legs, arms, etc... laid out on a steel tray. It wasn't the "beautiful freedom of expression" the left claims.
This post was edited on 2/3/23 at 10:40 am
Posted by HighlyFavoredTiger
TexLaArk
Member since Jun 2018
876 posts
Posted on 2/3/23 at 10:53 am to
They fail to mention that more importantly, there is NO proof that whatever is in the shots IS 100% safe and effective which is the main thing they should have to prove before they administered even 1 shot.
Posted by brgfather129
Los Angeles, CA
Member since Jul 2009
17097 posts
Posted on 2/3/23 at 11:10 am to
Yeah...that LinkedIn profile doesn't look fake as hell or anything.

"9 followers"
This post was edited on 2/3/23 at 12:02 pm
Posted by uptowntiger84
uptown
Member since Jul 2011
3885 posts
Posted on 2/3/23 at 11:53 am to
Unvaxxed and loving it. Who's with me?
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
73674 posts
Posted on 2/3/23 at 11:56 am to
quote:

there is NO proof that whatever is in the shots IS 100% safe and effective which is the main thing they should have to prove before they administered even 1 shot.


There would be zero medicines on the market if this were the hurdle.
Posted by USMEagles
Member since Jan 2018
11811 posts
Posted on 2/3/23 at 12:08 pm to
Dr. Kelly Victory says that the spike protein basically lingers and causes RNA transcription errors... paraphrasing from memory but it sounded really bad.

I feel like I've aged 10 years since I got the 2nd Pfizer shot- weight gain, reduced libido, dental problems. Last one I'll get.

There is no so-called conspiracy theory too sinister for me to believe at this point.
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
62854 posts
Posted on 2/3/23 at 12:11 pm to
I assume the page has been reliably debunked, but what's up with focusing on followers? I have a few hundred connections but 0 followers as far as I know. Are people conflating the two?
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57257 posts
Posted on 2/3/23 at 12:19 pm to
This thread is hilarious

Everything anti-vaxxers warned about has come to fruition

Countries who don’t allow commie pieces of shite to lead them have reported the actual numbers

Pfizer is on video admitting it

Insurance actuaries show it

Yet here we are listening to the same liberal retards crying…again
This post was edited on 2/3/23 at 12:20 pm
Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
68444 posts
Posted on 2/3/23 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

There would be zero medicines on the market if this were the hurdle.



There would be zero class action lawsuits against pharmaceutical companies too.



first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram