re: Pfizer final analysis shows coronavirus vaccine is 95% effective with no safety concerns

quote:

---

Large company on the cusp of making billions of dollars on product says product is really good and has no negative features. More at 11.

---

FDA approval is focused on product safety.

I'd be more concerned that the vaccine isn't as effective as they say than the possibility the vaccine may cause injury or harm.

quote:

---

Fauci has said lots of shite that we haven't done, so

---

And as I said in the other thread, we're about to have a President that has vowed to listen to him. Surely you see the difference.

quote:

---

And as I said in the other thread, we're about to have a President that has vowed to listen to him. Surely you see the difference.

---

Politicians vow lots of things. We also have checks and balances in our government.

quote:

---

Politicians vow lots of things

---

Does it get tiring doing this?

quote:

---

We also have checks and balances in our government.

---

Well those have done a lot for limiting the power of people choosing to exert it during the pandemic

quote:

---

Does it get tiring doing this?

---

doing what? stating facts?

quote:

---

Well those have done a lot for limiting the power of people choosing to exert it during the pandemic

---

so do you think even after widespread distribution of the vaccine that we will still have widespread mask mandates?

also, Fauci only recommended masks be worn even after the vaccine

just like Trump only recommended the lockdowns

quote:

---

However, to suggest that the pharma companies are somehow lying to the public about safety or efficacy doesn't make any sense to me.

---

There is no question they want to develop an effective vaccination. One, that would probably be the most famous in the history of humanity (given the amount of attention to this virus). Failure would be a massive PR blow. But the financial fallout of such MAY be limited. The US government has agreed to broadly indemnify and hold harmless the manufacturers.

quote:

---

To promote swift action by the private life sciences sector, the US Department of Health & Human Services (“HHS”) has conferred broad immunity on vaccine and therapy manufacturers for development activities relating to COVID-19. HHS’s immunity, issued as a Notice of Declaration under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (the “PREP Act”), protects companies manufacturing, distributing, and administrating countermeasures against COVID-19, excepting only willful misconduct.

---

While understandable from pharma companies' perspective, that's also a BIG safety net for them to work with. It makes it a bit easier to make boastful (qualified) claims if you know you have a large degree of immunity conferred by congress.

To me that reads as a protection from getting sued out of business if a few people die.....I don't think they can recover stuff like lost sales/profits under the PREP Act.

quote:

---

It is remarkable. It is one of the greatest achievements in human history and our retarded (meant literally) population is saying they won't take it even after 10s of thousands of trial patients

---

How many of those trial patients were kids?

A
BIG
FAT
frickING
ZERO

So why would any sane parent give their kid a vaccine with no research on them for children, with the virus itself poses virtually Zero risk to children.

quote:

---

They get to inject whatever nanotech they’ve been working on in every us citizen with no questions. Who knows what info this will give them and to what end? A lot of people are starting to question if this was the goal of releasing the virus in the first place.

---

quote:

---

How many of those trial patients were kids?

A
BIG
FAT
frickING
ZERO

So why would any sane parent give their kid a vaccine with no research on them for children, with the virus itself poses virtually Zero risk to children.

---

Now this misinformation should be deleted.

CNN Article Disputing Your Claim