LSU316

Bream [img]https://greatdaysoutdoors.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/bream-3.jpg[/img] Sac a Lait [img]https://www.heraldguide.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/p1366296354-1.jpg[/img]...

[quote]The Rowdy Roddy Piper one was really good and kind of sad.[/quote] There isn't a doubt in my mind that Roddy would be one of the older guys that would have tried to get in with AEW if he were still alive. He would have been a bright spot on it too....just like Jake and Arn have been. Not...

[quote]You two about finished with your "who's the biggest wrestling nerd" fight, so we can continue the thread?[/quote] The floor is yours sir....

[quote]Daredevil is the best thing from Marvel put on any screen. Movie or TV. Period.[/quote] Daredevil is good TV but come on it doesn’t touch the original Iron Man or Infinity War....

Just stay in Laffy and skip Nola.....it’s a lot easier to not get shot at the corner of Canal and Bourbon that way.....and you don’t have to worry about a mask....

BTW Is FWL starting anew with Wrestlemania Backlash?...

[quote]All you believers see something you can't understand and just attribute it to magic.[/quote] Suspend your disbelief my friend....

The problem is it doesn't matter....I understand that they have showed in court that the Dominion machines in multiple states were networked which is specifically not allowed on these voting machines. If they have shown that and the people that make the decisions don't care then I don't think there...

Wonderful....get that guy under oath, in a court room, in front of the judge, and do that same thing. Then get a Dominion person under oath on the stand in the court room to describe how/why that is possible....

[quote]Those findings were filed. Just listen to the court case.[/quote] I think it's pretty clear that nothing is going to happen based on what lawyers say or on documents in evidence. You need a guy in the court room, screw COVID, sitting at a Dominion machine running the software and alteri...

:lol:...valid question...

[quote]Any security person or security auditor would laugh at that notion[/quote] Decent ones wouldn't....the ones that work for federal and state government probably would though. ...

[quote]Pretty sure they introduced to the court the flipping, with demonstration, of votes using the machine.[/quote] They showed a guy running T-SQL code in SSMS against an MS SQL Server 2016 DB on a Dominion server that changed votes???? That would be pretty damning in my eyes....

[quote]Correct, or a small program could be developed to give special access. Don't name it. Wait until the machines are certified and then put it on it. "well, it wasn't listed and a no no.."[/quote] Again MS SQL Server 2016 Standard isn't "a small program"....I know hundreds of people that coul...

Now you are on a whole other path....the investigation or lack thereof of what happened with the election from Nov. 4, 2020 through the inauguration of Joe Biden as #46. That in and of itself has little if anything to do with MS SQL Server 2016....

[quote]One would think the transaction log would be preserved.[/quote] It depends on how good the DBA is that is getting paid to do the nefarious deed. It also depends on how good the person looking for the evidence of said nefarious deed is. I'm guessing the nefarious deed doer got paid mo...

[quote]Only specific software is allowed. Any software that isn't explicitly listed is not allowed.[/quote] Meh.....I'd bet that doesn't hold up in court....especially with the way SSMS is ingrained in the MS SQL Server 2016 Standard installation package. ETA Consider this....how easy would it...

I'm not going to say you don't know what you are talking about....BUT you are using some non-industry standard terminology to indicate what you are trying to talk about....

[quote]Does any of this prove that any votes were changed erroneously/fraudulently?[/quote] As I've stated if voting data servers are connected to a network I have a problem with that regardless of what software is included on a machine. Can you prove votes were changed if they were...probably...

So now you are crawfishing to SSMS again....like I said I don't see anywhere where it is documented that it isn't allowed. It could be server documents that we don't have access to. However, you should change you post to say "MS SQL Server Management Tools"....