Started By
Message

re: People actually convinced themselves to take an experimental vaccine for this?

Posted on 7/8/21 at 11:43 am to
Posted by Displaced
Member since Dec 2011
32711 posts
Posted on 7/8/21 at 11:43 am to
I hate to defend morons, but it was. It was a spin off parody thread.
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
17980 posts
Posted on 7/8/21 at 11:44 am to
quote:

Everybody's own choice on whether or not to get it between them and their doctors but at this point its just not experimental anymore.


False. Long term effects require long term studies. long term studies require....well....long term timelines.

It will be experimental for a long time and even with that it has been proven dangerous. Until they can identify what specifically is causing people to die and/or have severe side effects (not small numbers currently) you are playing russian roulettes. You say it is likely "safe for most" but you cannot say it is "safe."
Posted by LSUAngelHere1
Watson
Member since Jan 2018
8146 posts
Posted on 7/8/21 at 11:45 am to
We’re living in a clown world. This isn’t about vaccines though. It’s all steps to reach their ultimate goal of full submission to control us.
Posted by League Champs
Bayou Self
Member since Oct 2012
10340 posts
Posted on 7/8/21 at 11:45 am to
quote:

Date, time, and location administered

Like I said, to determine if they have a bad batch.

You think 400,000 reports are faked, but somehow nail the date, time, and location administered, in order to be submitted?

You don't think they govt. has a team of people poring over these reports?
Posted by Displaced
Member since Dec 2011
32711 posts
Posted on 7/8/21 at 11:46 am to
quote:

False. Long term effects require long term studies. long term studies require....well....long term timelines

By that logic, you have no idea what the long term effects of getting covid are...
Posted by Stexas
SWLA
Member since May 2013
6000 posts
Posted on 7/8/21 at 11:46 am to
quote:

League Champs


I was downvote # 72 FYI.
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
66787 posts
Posted on 7/8/21 at 11:48 am to
quote:

I will pray for you.


can we get a religion board?
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83558 posts
Posted on 7/8/21 at 11:48 am to
quote:

Like I said, to determine if they have a bad batch.


You think this is difficult to falsify? I could fill out a report right now. I haven't been vaccinated.

quote:

You think 400,000 reports are faked


I don't think all 400,000 are fake, no

quote:

but somehow nail the date, time, and location administered, in order to be submitted?


do you think there is some criteria for this or something?

quote:

You don't think they govt. has a team of people poring over these reports?


Of course. They have to investigate all of them.

Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110828 posts
Posted on 7/8/21 at 11:53 am to
quote:

you want me to take an experimental vax, that has killed almost 7,000 people within 72 hours of getting a dose?

But VAERS said it's true!!!!
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
66787 posts
Posted on 7/8/21 at 11:55 am to
interesting your stance on this topic vs possible election fraud.
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
14460 posts
Posted on 7/8/21 at 11:55 am to
I think everyone is lying.
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83558 posts
Posted on 7/8/21 at 11:58 am to
quote:

interesting your stance on this topic vs possible election fraud.


what is my stance on possible election fraud?

thanks
Posted by League Champs
Bayou Self
Member since Oct 2012
10340 posts
Posted on 7/8/21 at 11:58 am to
quote:

do you think there is some criteria for this or something?

OK, let's go slowly here, to help you understand. From the VAERS home page
quote:

Established in 1990, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is a national early warning system to detect possible safety problems in U.S. licensed vaccines.

Now how can their system be an early warning system, if they have no way to cross reference 400,000 reports, against where a bad batch might have popped up? Sorta defeats the whole purpose doesn't it?

And the reason the CDC can now attest that all the vaccines have caused blood clotting, and myocarditis is because of the matching reports from injections sites all over the country.

You just now cant assume that the system that verified those reactions, is just ignoring the false reporting of deaths.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36311 posts
Posted on 7/8/21 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

Pfizer vaccine protection against infection declines to 64%

From the clinical trials announcement of 93%.


quote:

The vaccine effectiveness of preventing infection and symptomatic disease fell to 64% since June 6, the Health Ministry said, Reuters reported. The good news is the vaccine was 93% effective in preventing serious illness from the coronavirus, including hospitalizations.


That's the entire quote, which you neglected to post for some reason. And if the vaccine has no "research" as you said, then why are you quoting the clinical trial data, which you quoted incorrectly?

Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54132 posts
Posted on 7/8/21 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

Now how can their system be an early warning system, if they have no way to cross reference 400,000 reports, against where a bad batch might have popped up? Sorta defeats the whole purpose doesn't it?
Is It your contention that when they evaluate the report and find it is unrelated to the vaccine it is removed from the VAERS?

quote:

the reason the CDC can now attest that all the vaccines have caused blood clotting, and myocarditis is because of the matching reports from injections sites all over the country.
And what have they determined about the almost 7,000 deaths after investigation as it relates to the vaccine?
This post was edited on 7/8/21 at 12:04 pm
Posted by STEVED00
Member since May 2007
22376 posts
Posted on 7/8/21 at 12:03 pm to
quote:


You think this is difficult to falsify? I could fill out a report right now. I haven't been vaccinated.



You think there is a higher % of people falsifying claims to VAERS than there are of people that had no idea the system existed and therefore did not submit their adverse affect to the system?
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164137 posts
Posted on 7/8/21 at 12:03 pm to
These people are breathlessly terrified of a common cold. It’s absolutely insane.
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83558 posts
Posted on 7/8/21 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

, if they have no way to cross reference 400,000 reports, against where a bad batch might have popped up?


Where did I say they have no way of cross referencing the reports? They have people investigating every claim.

quote:

You just now cant assume that the system that verified those reactions, is just ignoring the false reporting of deaths.


I don't think it is ignoring the deaths. But it takes months for causes of deaths to be confirmed.

Its much simpler to link less reactions.


Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
66787 posts
Posted on 7/8/21 at 12:05 pm to
k.
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83558 posts
Posted on 7/8/21 at 12:07 pm to
you did it again
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram