Started By
Message

re: Official Ferguson Live Riot Thread - Wilson to NOT be Indicted!

Posted on 11/25/14 at 11:57 am to
Posted by Mr. Tom Morrow
Cosmic Ray's Starlight Cafe
Member since Jun 2012
6847 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 11:57 am to
I've tried to find it but it doesn't seem to exist online yet. I've seen it on CNN 3 times now though.
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
74408 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 11:57 am to
quote:

Insurance doesnt cover riots


that sucks.
So in a riot you just pack up and move on?
Posted by Mr. Wayne
Member since Feb 2008
10087 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 11:57 am to
quote:

black cops?


Race card wielders hate them worse than white cops. Only see them as Uncle Tom's doing the white man's bidding.
Posted by Ash Williams
South of i-10
Member since May 2009
18561 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 11:57 am to
quote:

Is what they are saying about the process the grand jury went through true? Is it really that different? Would it be better for them to completely figure it out and not have any influence one way or the other?



what part of the process are you referring to?

Posted by PurpleandGold Motown
Birmingham, Alabama
Member since Oct 2007
24526 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 11:57 am to
I love how they cut off Sharpton, and now, they go back to Crump.

Oh boy, he's going to address QUERRSTUNS? (Sp?)
Posted by More beer please
Member since Feb 2010
46567 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 11:58 am to
quote:

So in a riot you just pack up and move on?


Either that or stay and defend what you own because you arent getting a dime for all the damage those idiots did.
Posted by LanierSpots
Gulf of America
Member since Sep 2010
71350 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 11:58 am to
No he isn't. LOL

He gone
Posted by LSUfonte
South Texas
Member since Jan 2004
8305 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 11:59 am to
bawawawawawa
Posted by RebelOP
Misty Mountain Top
Member since Jun 2013
12506 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 11:59 am to
You could try arson and see if you could get away with it.

"It was an electrical fire you see!"
Posted by beebefootballfan
Member since Mar 2011
20938 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 11:59 am to
White dude stiring up crap at the presser.
Posted by Adam4LSU
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2008
13763 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 11:59 am to
We in church yall
Posted by ashy larry
Marcy Projects
Member since Mar 2010
5582 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

All these people wanting cameras worn by cops at all times.. That's fine but does anybody believe there wouldn't be this outrage even if there was a video of it? Like all the evidence presented wasn't enough.


Personally, I think it would have prevented all of the protesting. The initial outrage came from the bullshite witness stories. By the time the evidence proved the witnesses to be lying, the 'movement' had too much steam to stop. The protesters became so invested in this whole ordeal that they will never believe the evidence over the the first witness accounts. A simple video of Brown acting out like he did and no media outlet would have bothered with it. First impressions do matter.
Posted by BOSCEAUX
Where the Down Boys go.
Member since Mar 2008
52696 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 12:00 pm to
Asian owned businesses in LA were packing all kinds of heat during the riots.
Posted by LanierSpots
Gulf of America
Member since Sep 2010
71350 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 12:00 pm to
Disturbance amung da folk


Posted by RebelOP
Misty Mountain Top
Member since Jun 2013
12506 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 12:01 pm to
The talking heads keep saying the process the grand jury went through isn't typical. They were given all the evidence.
Posted by Walt OReilly
Poplarville, MS
Member since Oct 2005
124694 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 12:01 pm to
Rev Sharpton loves him some attention
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
74408 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

Insurance doesnt cover riots


that sucks.
So in a riot you just pack up and move on?


Hmmm... Some coverages DO cover riots, it's "Acts of war" that are not covered.


quote:

Section 43.02[5] addresses exclusions related to violent uprisings and armed hostilities. Sections 43.02[5][a]-[e] explain that for the "war" exclusion to apply, armed hostilities between two or more states or sovereign entities must be ongoing. Losses resulting from usurped power, insurrection, invasion, rebellion, and civil war are also typically excluded from coverage, see Sections 43.02[5][g]-. [i]In contrast, as discussed in Section 43.02[5][f], losses resulting from domestic riot and civil commotion are generally covered. The unique problems presented by acts of terrorism are addressed in Section 43.02[5][j].

LINK



So I DO think many of the businesses especially the national chains will be covered and fine.

Posted by Redbone
my castle
Member since Sep 2012
20710 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

First impressions do matter.


And people became delusional.
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
53509 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 12:03 pm to
The media is DESPERATE to figure out the vote count of the grand jury.
Posted by More beer please
Member since Feb 2010
46567 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

Some coverages DO cover riots, it's "Acts of war" that are not covered.


Very few and I guarantee you none of the small business owners have that coverage. National chains most likely do but in the grand scheme of things it wont really hurt them.

Riot and Civil Commotion are general exclusions. Google all you want but I deal with this stuff for a living.
Jump to page
Page First 258 259 260 261 262 ... 349
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 260 of 349Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram