Started By
Message

re: numerical perspective on the COVID-19 overreaction

Posted on 5/11/20 at 12:28 pm to
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 5/11/20 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

Except we found out this was killing people and the wrong treatment.



Fair enough, but we didn't know that. And I qualified it with saying that was just the start.

The whole motivation for this was to prevent hospital systems from being overwhelmed. We have several examples of that happening from all over the world and coming from someone who works for a hospital company, I can tell you it is not pretty. Non-COVID patients were impacted just as much. Imagine having a heart attack or getting in a bad car wreck but all the hospitals are bursting at the seams with COVID patients and you can't get a bed.

However, it went on too long. We knew the vulnerable populations in early April and knew the measures needed for the rest of us to not spread (wash hands, social distance, etc.). That's when it should've opened up because the threat of overwhelming hospitals was all but gone.

But they pivoted their motivation for the shutdown somewhere along the way.

Posted by Thib-a-doe Tiger
Member since Nov 2012
36812 posts
Posted on 5/11/20 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

Ok thanks. I did see something about birx saying she can't trust CDC numbers




I don't think anyone can trust anyone's numbers right now, including mine


Had a few deaths close to me recenlty, patiently awaiting what is reported as cause of death. One of them had a super rare disease and hasn't left her house in months
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
71850 posts
Posted on 5/11/20 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

if we remove that single city from the US, Sweden's covid deaths per 1M is more than twice the US.


On the other side of this coin, wouldn't removing that one city make the essentially coast to coast extended shutdown look even more ridiculous?
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29134 posts
Posted on 5/11/20 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

On the other side of this coin, wouldn't removing that one city make the essentially coast to coast extended shutdown look even more ridiculous?
Goes to show that people can use statistics to make any point. Let's leave NYC in to make Sweden look good to support opening up the US. Then let's take NYC out to make the rest of the US look good to support opening up.

How about let's just take an honest look at the numbers, and support opening up based on the fact that the lives lost are not worth the cost of shutting down?
Posted by Sasquatch Smash
Member since Nov 2007
25964 posts
Posted on 5/11/20 at 1:06 pm to
Instead of comparing Sweden to the United States, why don't we compare them to a more similar country, population size-wise?

Like Belgium for example.

I mean, after all, Sweden has twice the population of the other Nordic countries. So, those don't make very apt comparisons.

Nothing like some good, ole cherry-picking!
Posted by MusclesofBrussels
Member since Dec 2015
5034 posts
Posted on 5/11/20 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

And Sweden is projected (of course those could be wrong) to have a larger economic contraction than the United States


Posted by Sasquatch Smash
Member since Nov 2007
25964 posts
Posted on 5/11/20 at 1:28 pm to
quote:

And as it happens, if we remove that single city from the US, Sweden's covid deaths per 1M is more than twice the US.



Conversely, how does that single city compare to Sweden straight up?

Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29134 posts
Posted on 5/11/20 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

Instead of comparing Sweden to the United States, why don't we compare them to a more similar country, population size-wise?

Like Belgium for example.

I mean, after all, Sweden has twice the population of the other Nordic countries. So, those don't make very apt comparisons.
Except Belgium is more than 10X as densely populated as Sweden.

Why don't we pick a region of similar population AND pop density to Sweden, like Arizona?
quote:

Nothing like some good, ole cherry-picking!
Yep!
Posted by DustyDinkleman
Here
Member since Feb 2012
20391 posts
Posted on 5/11/20 at 1:35 pm to
#WeWillGetThroughThisTogether
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29134 posts
Posted on 5/11/20 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

Conversely, how does that single city compare to Sweden straight up?
Considering it is roughly 500X more densely populated, not well.
Posted by Bunsbert Montcroff
Boise ID
Member since Jan 2008
5789 posts
Posted on 5/11/20 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

Why don't we pick a region of similar population AND pop density to Sweden, like Arizona?

arizona is a tough comparison to anything. if i remember correctly, 1/3 of our deaths came from the navajo reservation and surrounding cities like flagstaff and page, which have large native populations. the navajo/hopi rez itself is one of the least densely populated regions in the state.

we're not reporting nursing home deaths, which makes me wonder if they make up the other 2/3 (or close to it).
Posted by SneakyWaff1es
Member since Nov 2012
4161 posts
Posted on 5/11/20 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

They’ve got it a little better health wise than we do based on population numbers alone.
Sounds like COVID reasonse isn't the only thing we should emulate from Sweden.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29134 posts
Posted on 5/11/20 at 4:07 pm to
quote:

arizona is a tough comparison to anything.
So is Sweden. So is any place.

But Sweden is probably best compared to Norway and Finland if you want a rough estimate of the impact of various levels of shutting down. But the people who are most fixated on Sweden are those who want to use that data as a reason to end the shutdown. So they compare it to places that make it look good, rather than to places that make it look bad. It's just a dishonest move any way you slice it.

FWIW, I oppose the shutdown and have from day 1. I just have the opinion that we should be honest about the risks, the impacts of shutting down (both in reduced transmission rates and in the economic cost), and also about the value of a human life. We will never agree on anything until we all decide to be honest about the facts.
Posted by East Coast Band
Member since Nov 2010
67021 posts
Posted on 5/11/20 at 4:22 pm to
quote:

And there would have been much much more if there weren't SAH mandates put into place.

The whole idea was to flatten some curve. The assumption was the same number of people would contract the virus,but spread out over time. At no point at any time at any place in this country was our hospitals overrun with Covid19 cases. And it's been shown that the hospital cases aren't saving the people either. So, SAH has been mostly useless
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram