Started By
Message

re: Nissan recalls nearly 500K vehicles due to engine failures

Posted on 7/3/25 at 1:07 pm to
Posted by Pedro
Geaux Hawks
Member since Jul 2008
39157 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 1:07 pm to
From what I understand it’s a matter of when it goes not if it goes. I ended up just saying frick it and got a new car.
This post was edited on 7/3/25 at 1:08 pm
Posted by boxcarbarney
Above all things, be a man
Member since Jul 2007
26721 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 1:12 pm to
A coworker had engine troubles with her Hyundia. Something to do with the oil pump I believe.

The dealership kept the car for a number of weeks while fixing it.

She picks it up from the dealership, and drives to work. She comes in the office and asks why her oil light is coming on.

I check the dipstick, and it is bone dry. The service department neglected to refill the engine with oil.

Paint also just randomly flakes off her car. Not like a clear coat failure, but whole sections of paint just randomly flake off the car.
Posted by LSUtiger89
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
4700 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 1:13 pm to
Part of the problem is the vehicles keep getting bigger and bigger also. The size of vehicles are not needed for most people. But people keep buying bigger and bigger. So as vehicles get bigger, fuel efficiency goes down. But as CAFE stricter the fuel economy vs cars getting bigger it’s making a serious issue.
Posted by Cdawg
TigerFred's Living Room
Member since Sep 2003
61998 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

What is it with manufacturers and engines? First Hyundai, then Toyota, GMC and now Nissan.

First? It's always been Hyundai's.
Posted by SantaFe
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2019
7850 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 1:31 pm to

Can Nissan (Datsun) afford this ?
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
26608 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 1:31 pm to
I could have told them that the VC turbo design was crap. Super risky and very complicated for almost no return in better fuel economy. No way a company like Nissan could make that work with the maintenance philosophy of their typical customer.
This post was edited on 7/3/25 at 1:35 pm
Posted by JodyPlauche
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2009
9919 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 1:45 pm to
Nissan sucks and I hope they go out of business.
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
84713 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 1:49 pm to
This might be what finishes Nissan off
Posted by Tr33fiddy
Hog Jaw, Arkansas (it exists)
Member since Aug 2023
1971 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 2:00 pm to
We are all getting fed a shite sammich based on government over reach. It's impossible now to sell autos with engines that last trouble free long term.

I sold a lexus with half a million miles that drove like a new car with the original trans and engine. I had a 99 Nissan maxima give up the ghost at 420k miles. It's a damn shame cars like that can't be made anymore.
Posted by GREENHEAD22
Member since Nov 2009
20844 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 2:04 pm to
The 5.6 and the V6 in the Frontier are bullet proof.
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
74852 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 2:08 pm to
Here’s the automotive industry to Nissan:

Posted by TigerHornII
Member since Feb 2021
1161 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

They are trying meet the ridiculous CAFE requirements


Really not the case here, it is improperly manufactured bearings. One could make the argument that higher cylinder pressures usually seen in FI engines were the cause, but it is easy to engineer bearings to take the extra pressures.


Yes, it is the case. It is "easy" to engineer bearings to take the pressures ONLY if you don't have cost, weight, package, and even hydrodynamic drag requirements to meet. CAFE forces all four of those targets to be incredibly tight, with no margin whatsoever for error. Then layer on high cylinder pressures, and you get......kaboom.
Posted by TigerHornII
Member since Feb 2021
1161 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

Part of the problem is the vehicles keep getting bigger and bigger also. The size of vehicles are not needed for most people. But people keep buying bigger and bigger. So as vehicles get bigger, fuel efficiency goes down. But as CAFE stricter the fuel economy vs cars getting bigger it’s making a serious issue.


Not at all accurate. CAFE is a complex formula that factors in vehicle footprint. OEMs with larger vehicles actually get a little bit of a break. This is the only reason you can still buy a full-size truck or SUV.
Posted by threeputtforbogie
Addison, TX
Member since Sep 2017
1008 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 2:14 pm to
Should be the final nail in the coffin for Nissan.
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
72094 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 2:23 pm to
quote:

and you get......kaboom.


Well, usually more like eeeeeeeeehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhuyuuuuhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhwackwackwackwackwackwackwackwackwackwackwackwackwonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnk

Followed by silence

Or wackacwacakakwackwackwakaPOW

followed by silence

Posted by Tr33fiddy
Hog Jaw, Arkansas (it exists)
Member since Aug 2023
1971 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

Not at all accurate. CAFE is a complex formula that factors in vehicle footprint. OEMs with larger vehicles actually get a little bit of a break. This is the only reason you can still buy a full-size truck or SUV.


Cafe is actually what killed the small trucks. Manufactures had to make compact trucks midsized to avoid the cafe fuel economy standards. Basically a compact pickup is subject to the same economy standards as a small car so they just made them bigger.
Posted by Billy Blanks
Member since Dec 2021
5090 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 2:29 pm to
Toyota and Honda will continue to eat.
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
30482 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

Yes, it is the case. It is "easy" to engineer bearings to take the pressures ONLY if you don't have cost, weight, package, and even hydrodynamic drag requirements to meet. CAFE forces all four of those targets to be incredibly tight, with no margin whatsoever for error. Then layer on high cylinder pressures, and you get......kaboom.


All that is irrelevant unless you have information that contradicts Nissan's assertion that it was a manufacturing issue.
Posted by blue_morrison
Member since Jan 2013
5941 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 2:38 pm to
Big Altima Energy is back baby
Posted by ole man
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2007
18027 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 2:50 pm to
Govt regulations bruh. I’m gonn drive my 2007 tundra till the wheels fall off 220k and still great
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram