Started By
Message

re: New studies find that being fat is not healthy

Posted on 1/22/21 at 4:40 pm to
Posted by LSUfan4444
Member since Mar 2004
53730 posts
Posted on 1/22/21 at 4:40 pm to
I just had my annual blood work and biometric screening for my HSA bonus and lost out on $100 for my BMI being 25

Now, they weighed me in my shoes, sweats, a shirt and my hoodie but F that!!

I made another appt for Monday and I’m wearing my speedo underneath my sweats and if the weight doesn’t get me under 25, I’m dropping trou, no question

Posted by Bryno1960
Off River Road
Member since Aug 2013
2497 posts
Posted on 1/22/21 at 7:57 pm to
quote:

what has changed besides more people being fat? fat is still fat. anything above 18% body fat is well....fat.


Anything above 18% is fat? At 5’9”, 149lbs, my BMI is 22 which is in the healthy range and I don’t consider myself fat.
Posted by evil cockroach
27.98N // 86.92E
Member since Nov 2007
7454 posts
Posted on 1/22/21 at 9:00 pm to
This chart is correct . But I’m now married with 2 kids, zero fricks given.
Posted by MickeyLikesDags21
Member since Apr 2019
6640 posts
Posted on 1/22/21 at 9:25 pm to
quote:

Anything above 18% is fat? At 5’9”, 149lbs, my BMI is 22 which is in the healthy range and I don’t consider myself fat.


22 BMI =\= 22% body fat

If you were 5'9" 149lbs at 22% body fat I'd ask for a picture because I have no idea what that would look like.
Posted by suavecito80
Member since Apr 2014
2869 posts
Posted on 2/12/21 at 6:03 am to
I’m down
This post was edited on 2/12/21 at 6:04 am
Posted by Nguyener
Kame House
Member since Mar 2013
20603 posts
Posted on 2/12/21 at 6:41 am to
Halo Tops new ad campaign will not like this at all
Posted by DLauw
SWLA
Member since Sep 2011
6086 posts
Posted on 2/12/21 at 6:48 am to
Who knew?

But

frick that chart. 6’2” 145 - 160 ain’t healthy. Must be a chart for women.
Posted by YouAre8Up
in a house
Member since Mar 2011
12792 posts
Posted on 2/12/21 at 6:51 am to
Posted by Strannix
District 11
Member since Dec 2012
48838 posts
Posted on 2/12/21 at 6:53 am to
I 100% agree but take that chart to Devin White and tell him hes obese....
Posted by X123F45
Member since Apr 2015
27346 posts
Posted on 2/12/21 at 7:08 am to
quote:

TD BMI threads


I've had a dexa scan which said I was obese. I've had another 40ish lbs lighter that said I wasn't.

Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89476 posts
Posted on 2/12/21 at 7:20 am to
Old studies do, too. And middlish age studies do, too.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89476 posts
Posted on 2/12/21 at 7:31 am to
quote:

Anything above 18% is fat?


FFS - y'all are all confusing a bunch of different things.

quote:

At 5’9”, 149lbs, my BMI is 22 which is in the healthy range and I don’t consider myself fat.


Well, NIH considers you in the healthy range of BMI - which is a ratio of weight:height, NOT even an estimate of body composition.

That how these discussions go wrong. Many professional athletes are clinically obese using BMI guidelines. Extra weight for height, beyond a certain point, is inherently dangerous regardless of the fitness level of the person.

If person A is a 6'2", 215 pound football safety, obviously that guy is likely to be "healthier" than person B, a 6'0" 190 pound, doughy computer programmer who eats like crap. But, the bigger man's heart, endocrine system, ligaments, etc., are all under more stress than they would be at a lower weight.

BMI isn't about body composition, fitness levels, bone density, genetics - it is just about risk management associated with weight (either too high or too low). Obesity, regardless of body composition, is a red flag/risk factor for various ailments.

For some good news, it is better to be slightly overweight (not obese, just high of a 25 BMI) than slightly underweight.
This post was edited on 2/12/21 at 7:32 am
Posted by MickeyLikesDags21
Member since Apr 2019
6640 posts
Posted on 2/12/21 at 8:38 am to
quote:


Well, NIH considers you in the healthy range of BMI - which is a ratio of weight:height, NOT even an estimate of body composition.

That how these discussions go wrong. Many professional athletes are clinically obese using BMI guidelines. Extra weight for height, beyond a certain point, is inherently dangerous regardless of the fitness level of the person.

If person A is a 6'2", 215 pound football safety, obviously that guy is likely to be "healthier" than person B, a 6'0" 190 pound, doughy computer programmer who eats like crap. But, the bigger man's heart, endocrine system, ligaments, etc., are all under more stress than they would be at a lower weight.

BMI isn't about body composition, fitness levels, bone density, genetics - it is just about risk management associated with weight (either too high or too low). Obesity, regardless of body composition, is a red flag/risk factor for various ailments.

For some good news, it is better to be slightly overweight (not obese, just high of a 25 BMI) than slightly underweight.


This should be the top reply for every single thread that BMI gets mentioned. Treat this post like the babe thread rules where it gets posted in the OP every time.
Posted by lsucoonass
shreveport and east texas
Member since Nov 2003
68446 posts
Posted on 2/12/21 at 8:39 am to
What’s an active obese person
Posted by MickeyLikesDags21
Member since Apr 2019
6640 posts
Posted on 2/12/21 at 8:41 am to
quote:

What’s an active obese person


A liar
Posted by Eauxs Eaux Face
Member since Dec 2016
260 posts
Posted on 2/12/21 at 8:50 am to


Hell I'm overweight and I know its not healthy but been working on it for a couple years, and down about 60 pounds
Posted by bonescanner
Member since Oct 2011
2238 posts
Posted on 2/12/21 at 8:58 am to
in other news, water is wet.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 9Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram