
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
New Orleans mandated affordable housing. Developers stopped building
Posted on 10/4/26 at 10:20 am
Posted on 10/4/26 at 10:20 am
quote:
Kirk Williamson had plans for a larger apartment project on Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard in New Orleans. Were it not for a city-mandated affordable housing provision, it might have been built.
Now, the City Council is rolling back that mandate after a 2025 report found it had failed to produce a single apartment complex since being passed in 2020.
Williamson spent roughly 15 years building and renovating housing in New Orleans, including as the former CEO of JLB Construction, one of the city's larger residential builders. He described the work as a calling.
“You get to take some of these old historic properties and turn them back into something new while making them look the way they were,” Williamson said. “It feeds into the culture of the city.”
But the economics of doing that work in New Orleans have become increasingly difficult to justify, and Williamson pointed to the mandate as the last straw. Housing affordability in the city has only gotten worse.
In 2020, it was already expensive enough to build housing. Insurance costs were climbing. City building requirements were adding costs of their own. And COVID was about to make matters worse.
Then the city gave developers a choice: build affordable housing or pay a fee for every required affordable unit they did not provide on site.
Under the mandate, a 10-unit apartment complex in the city's Core mandatory inclusionary zone would generally have to reserve one unit as affordable housing. If the developer chose not to, the alternative fee could total about $300,000.
For Williamson, now the owner of Chester Development, that meant no longer building apartment projects with more than four units, thereby avoiding the mandate.
“We actually had a project on MLK that we didn't move forward on because they were going to require set-asides," Williamson said. “Most people I've talked to — other builders out there — are building fourplexes maximum in the city of New Orleans.”
Now, six years later, the City Council has unanimously voted to sharply roll back the policy, cutting the fee from $304,810 to $10,000. The mandate remains in place, but developers can now avoid the set-aside requirement at a much lower cost.
“We are preserving the structure of the Mandatory Inclusionary Zoning program, so that higher fees in lieu and more robust requirements can be reinstated when the City's real estate market is stronger and more able to bear them,” Council member Lesli Harris said in a statement.
The report behind the rollback was written by HR&A Advisors, the same firm that helped design the policy in the first place.
LINK
There were some huge proponents of this mandate on here in 2019 when it was going through deliberations. C on z, draconian sanctions off top of my head were saying it was a sensible policy that would either lower home prices or increase revenue. Idiots
Posted on 10/4/26 at 10:24 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
C on z, draconian sanctions off top of my head were saying it was a sensible policy that would either lower home prices or increase revenue.
quote:
Idiots

Posted on 10/4/26 at 10:28 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
What was the inclusionary zone? CBD and French Quarter?
City needs to quit catering to every developer that wants to frick over the general population. It is why canal street looks the way it does and why buildings keep falling down.
City needs to quit catering to every developer that wants to frick over the general population. It is why canal street looks the way it does and why buildings keep falling down.
Posted on 10/4/26 at 10:32 am to fightin tigers
Doesn’t the policy screw over residents ultimately? The developers are just doing the math and saying the investment doesn’t justify the return therefore not building.
Posted on 10/4/26 at 10:32 am to fightin tigers
I agree with that. And if the policy artificially kept multi family buildings at 4 apartments max, that is a good thing. A very good thing
Posted on 10/4/26 at 10:33 am to fightin tigers
quote:
City needs to quit catering to every developer that wants to frick over the general population. It is why canal street looks the way it does and why buildings keep falling down.
Yeah! That’s the reason!!! Preach!!
/sarcasm off
Posted on 10/4/26 at 10:36 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
C on z, draconian sanctions off top of my head were saying it was a sensible policy that would either lower home prices or increase revenue.
Of course they supported the expansion of Section 8. Spreading ghetto housing is a fundamental goal of every Democrat.
Posted on 10/4/26 at 10:36 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Funny I talked to a builder in Santa Cruz that has a similar city mandate. Guy told me they said frick it and built the entire 50+ units without reserving any as affordability. They doubled the money on those units by selling them and opting for the fine. Also tied up the fine in court for a couple years before having to pay.
Posted on 10/4/26 at 10:37 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
What does "affordable housing" actually mean? There are many working folks that can afford one price for a house, and plenty of non workers that can't afford anything.
Posted on 10/4/26 at 10:40 am to East Coast Band
quote:
What does "affordable housing" actually mean?
You know what it means. We all do.
Posted on 10/4/26 at 10:40 am to UptownJoeBrown
quote:
Yeah! That’s the reason!!!
/sarcasm off
It is.
Posted on 10/4/26 at 10:40 am to East Coast Band
quote:
What does "affordable housing" actually mean?
It’s another word for vote buying.
Posted on 10/4/26 at 10:41 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Who would have thought this would happen…..
Government trying to “fix” a problem only to totally frick it up…..
Government trying to “fix” a problem only to totally frick it up…..
Posted on 10/4/26 at 10:42 am to LSUthrilla
quote:
Doesn’t the policy screw over residents ultimately? The developers are just doing the math and saying the investment doesn’t justify the return therefore not building.
Probably screws over out of town investors more than residents. Why WHD can look like a ghost town on weekday night. Everyone leaves.
Posted on 10/4/26 at 10:51 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
If you want affordable housing get rid of section 8 that keeps rent artificially high.
Posted on 10/4/26 at 11:21 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Maybe I’m in the minority but why does any city build low income housing period?
Back in the day, if you couldn’t afford where you live, you have to leave. Why should the poors get a break when I don’t?
Back in the day, if you couldn’t afford where you live, you have to leave. Why should the poors get a break when I don’t?
Posted on 10/4/26 at 11:27 am to idlewatcher
quote:
Maybe I’m in the minority but why does any city build low income housing period?
Address homelessness and keeps a low wage work force available to businesses.
quote:
Back in the day, if you couldn’t afford where you live, you have to leave. Why should the poors get a break when I don’t?
Yep. Creates a labor shortage. Why NYC low wage workers make more than a lot of people in Louisiana who have "good" jobs.
This post was edited on 10/4/26 at 11:29 am
Posted on 10/4/26 at 11:29 am to fightin tigers
quote:
buildings keep falling down
That happened because an unqualified inspector didn't do her job.
Posted on 10/4/26 at 11:31 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Evil property developers refusing housing to residents because they don’t want to set aside one tiny apartment for poor people. - resident Nola AWFLs

Popular
Back to top


12












