Started By
Message

re: Neanderthals and humans interbred 47000 years ago for nearly 7,000 years research suggests

Posted on 6/11/24 at 5:21 am to
Posted by Hangit
The Green Swamp
Member since Aug 2014
46852 posts
Posted on 6/11/24 at 5:21 am to
I wonder if she was an animal in the sack after a few glasses of wine?

Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
63783 posts
Posted on 6/11/24 at 5:23 am to
quote:

same thing that makes all European males the descendants of Charlemagne


This isn’t true.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
63783 posts
Posted on 6/11/24 at 5:25 am to
quote:

Well I don't believe in neanderthals.


Are you one of those “the earth is 6000 years old” people?
Posted by The Torch
DFW The Dub
Member since Aug 2014
29615 posts
Posted on 6/11/24 at 5:33 am to
That was my ancestors.

They would frick anything that they could catch - Like Me







back in the day
Posted by Sidicous
NELA
Member since Aug 2015
19296 posts
Posted on 6/11/24 at 5:33 am to
Not the least bit surprising after perusing the OT. One finds that a surprisingly large number of people will attempt to mate with anything and everything that crosses their path.
Posted by mauser
Orange Beach
Member since Nov 2008
26943 posts
Posted on 6/11/24 at 5:39 am to
What percentage of DNA do Neanderthals and Humans have in common?
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
63783 posts
Posted on 6/11/24 at 5:44 am to
quote:

What percentage of DNA do Neanderthals and Humans have in common?


Neanderthals do not exist anymore.
Posted by Rockbrc
Attic
Member since Nov 2015
9765 posts
Posted on 6/11/24 at 6:01 am to
I think I have a couple working for me
Posted by mindbreaker
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2011
7916 posts
Posted on 6/11/24 at 6:04 am to
quote:

Well I don't believe in neanderthals.


So, because I'm curious, you think what? The evidence in fossil records and habitats uncovered over the last 300 years is made up? Who is faking this and making it up, and for what purpose?

Do you not believe in other groups of animals that are extinct. Wooly Mammoths? Sabertooth Tigers? Dinosaurs? Megalodon Sharks? or is it just the ones directly related to Humans? what is your cut off point and why?
Posted by Hoovertigah
Fayetteville
Member since Sep 2013
3815 posts
Posted on 6/11/24 at 6:07 am to
quote:

I don't believe any of that shite. Period


I’m with you man.
Posted by White Bear
Homeless
Member since Jul 2014
17640 posts
Posted on 6/11/24 at 6:09 am to
Could sniff butts and mount whomever you fancied back in those days.
Posted by lsufanva
sandston virginia
Member since Aug 2009
13565 posts
Posted on 6/11/24 at 6:12 am to
Agree. Similar to the technology that built the pyramids. We can find fossils of Neanderthals yet not one single sliver of evidence of advanced tools capable of cutting, drilling, moving and placing giant stones all across the globe. Tools would be of the same materials found in the ground while bone would not. Yet only bone survives. It's extremely questionable from my novice point of view. A little too convenient to me that only the evidence of life remain and not the ruins of the things they accumulated. In films when barren lands are found, what's generally the one thing missing? People. All the things remain. Why would it be different in real life?
Posted by tketaco
Sunnyside, Houston
Member since Jan 2010
21748 posts
Posted on 6/11/24 at 6:17 am to
quote:

Not even going there…


I'll carry the load for your brother.....


Black people come from Africa.

There is far too much retail store footage to not avoid what the study suggests.
This post was edited on 6/11/24 at 6:21 am
Posted by Dixie Normus
Earth
Member since Sep 2013
2875 posts
Posted on 6/11/24 at 6:21 am to
Given the intelligence of the general population, I’m not surprised.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
63783 posts
Posted on 6/11/24 at 6:28 am to
quote:

Yet only bone survives. It's extremely questionable from my novice point of view. A little too convenient to me that only the evidence of life remain and not the ruins of the things they accumulated.


What? We have found Neanderthal artifacts.
Posted by Hondo Blacksheep
Member since Jul 2022
3141 posts
Posted on 6/11/24 at 6:50 am to
My DNA test said I'm 4% Neanderthal, which is odd given that I'm 75% Italian/Arab.

Oh well, we are what we are, it's not like we get to pick and choose our genetic traits.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
63783 posts
Posted on 6/11/24 at 6:52 am to
quote:

which is odd given that I'm 75% Italian/Arab.


Why would that be odd?
Posted by thejuiceisloose
Member since Nov 2018
6390 posts
Posted on 6/11/24 at 6:56 am to
quote:

Well I don't believe in neanderthals.


Well, I hope you know that they believe in you.
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
134653 posts
Posted on 6/11/24 at 6:59 am to
That explains Fetterman
Posted by Hondo Blacksheep
Member since Jul 2022
3141 posts
Posted on 6/11/24 at 7:00 am to
Because the Neanderthal gene is more typically associated with whiter Europeans, or so I understand the situation (always a dangerous proposition lol).
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram