- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 7/31/17 at 11:29 am to CAD703X
quote:
The perp could literally get on the stand and scream he hates cyclists and goes out actively seeking to run them off the road and idiots on here would still be on his side.
he would have to be a terrible driver to barely clip one
Posted on 7/31/17 at 11:31 am to Topwater Trout
I doubt he meant to actually hit the guy. He more than likely just wanted to scare him.
The charges should be the same either way though
The charges should be the same either way though
Posted on 7/31/17 at 11:32 am to member12
quote:how do you define intentionally driving into a cyclist?
. It didn't show premeditation.
Posted on 7/31/17 at 11:33 am to CAD703X
quote:
how do you define intentionally driving into a cyclist?
An idiot looking at his phone? Feels a bump and keeps going?
Posted on 7/31/17 at 11:33 am to beerJeep
quote:there's an idiot looking at his phone right now named beerjeep
An idiot looking at his phone? Feels a bump and keeps going?
Posted on 7/31/17 at 11:33 am to Salmon
quote:
I doubt he meant to actually hit the guy. He more than likely just wanted to scare him.
Yet one fool insists that he did without evidence.
This reminds me of these cases where people get shot by cops after they pull a gun out. The media piles on because of the race angle and always finds in the black community that insist the whole thing was planned in advanced by the police.
This post was edited on 7/31/17 at 11:39 am
Posted on 7/31/17 at 11:34 am to CAD703X
quote:
there's an idiot looking at his phone right now named beerjeep
Zinngggg good one. If I wanted a comeback I'd wipe it off your mom's chin.
Posted on 7/31/17 at 11:35 am to CAD703X
quote:
intentionally driving into a cyclist?
You keep saying this and keep failing to provide evidence to back it up.
It's an accident until proven otherwise.
This post was edited on 7/31/17 at 11:36 am
Posted on 7/31/17 at 11:35 am to goofball
quote:
This reminds me of these cases where people get shot by cops after they pull a gun out. The media piles on because of the race angle and always finds in the black community that insist the whole thing was planned in advanced by the police.
are you retarded?
Posted on 7/31/17 at 11:36 am to CAD703X
quote:
Neely is accused of removing the stickers from the SUV before troopers arrived at his home.
This is destroying evidence?
So if I rob a bank in a red shirt then the next day they arrest me in a white shirt I can be charged with destroying evidence?
Posted on 7/31/17 at 11:36 am to Topwater Trout
quote:
He will pay after a civil case but still probably not much
Tennessee's Civil Justice Act tort reform law has really hamstrung the amount of damages one can get. Given the caps and the (presumptive) insignificant injuries the cyclist sustained, I doubt the number will be shocking.
Posted on 7/31/17 at 11:38 am to OysterPoBoy
quote:
This is destroying evidence?
It's a stretch, but I could get there.
I don't see how a video of a hit and run proves some malicious plan to intentionally hit a cyclist.
Posted on 7/31/17 at 11:39 am to goofball
quote:
I don't see how a video of a hit and run proves some malicious plan to intentionally hit a cyclist.
It doesn't.
The testimony of other witnesses of previous aggressive behavior does.
Posted on 7/31/17 at 11:39 am to goofball
quote:
This reminds me of these cases where people get shot by cops after they pull a gun out. The media piles on because of the race angle and always finds in the black community that insist the whole thing was planned in advanced by the police.
What the frick?
Posted on 7/31/17 at 11:41 am to beerJeep
quote:
Zinngggg good one. If I wanted a comeback I'd wipe it off your mom's chin.
you got served. Just take the LPosted on 7/31/17 at 11:41 am to Salmon
quote:
The testimony of other witnesses of previous aggressive behavior does.
How?
Posted on 7/31/17 at 11:42 am to OysterPoBoy
quote:
Neely is accused of removing the stickers from the SUV before troopers arrived at his home.
This is destroying evidence?
So if I rob a bank in a red shirt then the next day they arrest me in a white shirt I can be charged with destroying evidence?
Are you a judge in Baton Rouge IRL? Posted on 7/31/17 at 11:42 am to Mo Jeaux
quote:
How?
It doesn't prove it. It could prove intent though.
Posted on 7/31/17 at 11:43 am to CAD703X
quote:
you got served. Just take the L
Not quite
just keep peddling. One day you might reach the speed limit on the roads you block. 
Page 9 of 15
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News