Started By
Message

re: Napoleon Bonaparte's win-loss record is a sight to behold...

Posted on 12/10/23 at 12:50 pm to
Posted by LAhinguarst
The Box
Member since Oct 2020
395 posts
Posted on 12/10/23 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

Waterloo



Something about it doesn't matter how many you win if you don't win the last one.
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
51448 posts
Posted on 12/10/23 at 12:53 pm to
Now compare him to Caesar
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65139 posts
Posted on 12/10/23 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

Now compare him to Caesar


Caesar is definitely Top 3 all-time.
Posted by Philzilla
Member since Nov 2011
1392 posts
Posted on 12/10/23 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

RollTide1987

I doubt you are qualified to provide an answer to your own question.
Have you ever lead troops into battle?
Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48425 posts
Posted on 12/10/23 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

when the armies met in the field they were of equal sizes.


A quick check on Wiki will show that Napoleon was outnumbered in just about all of his battles.

Posted by Tom288
Jacksonville
Member since Apr 2009
20995 posts
Posted on 12/10/23 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

Caesar is definitely Top 3 all-time.


Smacking around disorganized Gallic tribes is not that impressive. I mean, sure, he handed them their arse. But that's not really saying much.
Posted by ZZTIGERS
Member since Dec 2007
17093 posts
Posted on 12/10/23 at 1:03 pm to
Clearly Napoleon had his own Tom Brady to help bolster that record.
Posted by Locoguan0
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Nov 2017
4316 posts
Posted on 12/10/23 at 1:08 pm to
Silly comparison. Lee fought for a rebellion with no industry to back him up. Napoleon had an entire country, which was one of the great powers of Europe, to draw from.
Posted by RoyalWe
Prairieville, LA
Member since Mar 2018
3123 posts
Posted on 12/10/23 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

Wasn’t there an Alexander guy who was undefeated?
C'mon, man. Like, that's your opinion, man. He wasn't that great.
Posted by RoyalWe
Prairieville, LA
Member since Mar 2018
3123 posts
Posted on 12/10/23 at 1:10 pm to
Caesar loses points for destroying the Library of Alexandria. How many centuries did this set us back?
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65139 posts
Posted on 12/10/23 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

I doubt you are qualified to provide an answer to your own question.


I don't remember asking a question. Yep, I just scrolled through my post and could not find where I asked a question.

quote:

Have you ever lead troops into battle?



I have not. However, I am currently serving in the military so I might get my chance soon enough.
Posted by supatigah
CEO of the Keith Hernandez Fan Club
Member since Mar 2004
87476 posts
Posted on 12/10/23 at 1:12 pm to
to defeat Napoleon at Waterloo, the 7th coalition had troops and resources from 15 countries
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65139 posts
Posted on 12/10/23 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

Wasn’t there an Alexander guy who was undefeated?



He was undefeated but it's very difficult to quantify Alexander's career as the man only commanded armies in 10 battles. Napoleon commanded armies in over 80 different engagements.
Posted by AllbyMyRelf
Virginia
Member since Nov 2014
3328 posts
Posted on 12/10/23 at 1:13 pm to
Borodino is considered a victory for Napoleon? I guess a Pyrrhic victory at best
Posted by AllbyMyRelf
Virginia
Member since Nov 2014
3328 posts
Posted on 12/10/23 at 1:14 pm to
Did you miss the part where he defeated a numerically superior Pompey the Great?

Also, to dismiss the Gauls as disorganized tribes is moronic. The Romans feared the Gauls more than any other people to that time. The Gauls managed to sack Rome—the only sacking of the city in 800 years until the crumbling of the West under weak western rulers. Vercingetorix united the Gauls into an impressive force. Caesar’s victory over them made him a superhero to the rest of the Romans
This post was edited on 12/10/23 at 2:00 pm
Posted by Undertow
Member since Sep 2016
7323 posts
Posted on 12/10/23 at 1:14 pm to
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65139 posts
Posted on 12/10/23 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

Borodino is considered a victory for Napoleon?


He pushed the Russian army from its redoubts and off the field, forcing Kutuzov to retreat. If not for all the smoke and dust, Napoleon might have pressed home the attack as the Russians were in complete disarray at one point that afternoon/evening. Napoleon was also outnumbered by roughly 50,000 soldiers, was on the offensive, and still inflicted twice as many casualties on the Russians than they did on him.
Posted by AllbyMyRelf
Virginia
Member since Nov 2014
3328 posts
Posted on 12/10/23 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

I guess a Pyrrhic victory at best
Posted by Wrenchruh
Parts Unknown
Member since Sep 2012
2413 posts
Posted on 12/10/23 at 1:24 pm to
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65139 posts
Posted on 12/10/23 at 1:25 pm to
Why would you call it a Pyrrhic victory?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram