Started By
Message

re: My fiancee cheated on me.

Posted on 11/17/17 at 10:47 pm to
Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48268 posts
Posted on 11/17/17 at 10:47 pm to
quote:

One guy came in and said LA code has been changed. He said Medic is not on the hook even though he signed the birth certificate. He provided the numbers.


OP has not provided us with all of the facts. Was Mom still married when baby was born? If not, was the divorce within 300 days of the birth? If so, Husband is presumed to be Dad.

If birth was out of wedlock, did OP sign an affidavit of paternity along with the birth certificate?

There are more facts that anybody would need to know before concluding whether OP is liable for child support and OP apparently is no longer interested in further exploring the issue.

All states are highly interested in finding an obligated father when it comes to child support because if Mom gets any welfare, the state can make Dad pay some support. It would be a real surprise if any state changed the law to make it more EASY for someone to avoid paying child support. That would be against the well-established legal trend.
This post was edited on 11/17/17 at 10:48 pm
Posted by Bushmaster
19th Hole
Member since Oct 2008
39616 posts
Posted on 11/17/17 at 11:01 pm to
Whatever comes of this I hope the best for the kids but what man starts dating a broad who is knocked up with some other dudes kid?

Posted by Hangit
The Green Swamp
Member since Aug 2014
39040 posts
Posted on 11/17/17 at 11:01 pm to
quote:

It would be a real surprise if any state changed the law to make it more EASY for someone to avoid paying child support


It would really put some justice in the justice system to change the law requiring somebody to pay when they are unrelated to the child.

A guy finds out he is not the father when the child is two and has to pay for somebody else's child for 16 more years? bullshite. That is so unjust.

Justice would be making her reimburse him for lying to him, tricking him, and conning him out of money.
Posted by Peazey
Metry
Member since Apr 2012
25418 posts
Posted on 11/17/17 at 11:12 pm to
The idea really is something that just gives me that "disgusted" feeling in the pit of my stomach. Maybe it stems from the idea that it could happen to me, but it really bothers me that it happens to anybody.

That the government can decide to commandeer a person's ability to make his own way in life in such a direct and dishonest manner in the name of being for the good of another person for which the man should have no responsibility. It's hard enough to get ahead in life without having to pay out that extra probably large portion of your income that must inevitably set behind a man's life goals. Goals that a person only has one life to achieve. It's sickening.

Maybe I'm coming at it wrong, maybe the reality is that this exact sort of thing that I have in mind doesn't happen that often in reality, but this is how it seems to me.
This post was edited on 11/17/17 at 11:17 pm
Posted by lsusteve1
Member since Dec 2004
41859 posts
Posted on 11/17/17 at 11:24 pm to
Fiancee, you say?

Bud, she did you a favor and you just don't know it yet.
Posted by blackandgoldGOD
Member since Oct 2010
1035 posts
Posted on 11/17/17 at 11:44 pm to
Take all her money
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
70890 posts
Posted on 11/18/17 at 12:31 am to
Don't let her frick your, brother. Idk if she can and/or what that mechanism would be. But I hope you will ask someone these questions. No surprises. Best of luck, and I know this will be really tough.
Posted by LooseCannon22282
Mobile
Member since May 2008
33684 posts
Posted on 11/18/17 at 2:06 am to
quote:

My fiancee cheated on me.



think about the guy who was the first one ever to have this happen to him.

Posted by JudgeHolden
Gila River
Member since Jan 2008
18566 posts
Posted on 11/18/17 at 2:40 am to
quote:

That the government can decide to commandeer a person's ability to make his own way in life in such a direct and dishonest manner in the name of being for the good of another person for which the man should have no responsibility.


If you create a child, you are responsible. Period.

If you marry a woman who creates a child, you are responsible unless you prove it isn’t yours.

If you swear under oath that the child is yours, you are responsible unless you can prove it isn’t yours.

It’s hard for me to see these rules as a government overreach.
Posted by Gris Gris
OTIS!NO RULES FOR SAUCES ON STEAK!!
Member since Feb 2008
47359 posts
Posted on 11/18/17 at 2:47 am to
Exactly.
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
131245 posts
Posted on 11/18/17 at 2:56 am to
Medic, since it is apparent the relationship is over, is it too soon to ask for her number?
Posted by JudgeHolden
Gila River
Member since Jan 2008
18566 posts
Posted on 11/18/17 at 3:12 am to
I’ll admit I chuckled. And yes. Too soon.
Posted by saint tiger225
San Diego
Member since Jan 2011
35348 posts
Posted on 11/18/17 at 3:20 am to
Sorry you didn't deliver the D as good as Jody.

quote:

And I told her I forgave her, 

Why the frick would you forgive your fiancee for banging someone else?

Just by reading your OP, I see why it happened.
Posted by saint tiger225
San Diego
Member since Jan 2011
35348 posts
Posted on 11/18/17 at 3:27 am to
quote:

I know my daughter isn't biologically mine. She was just pregnant when I met her. But my daughter is my daughter. She's my world and nothing will ever change that.

Wait a fricking second here.

You got with a chick who was pregnant with another guy's baby when she got with you. You knew about it, still asked her to marry you and have her become your fiancee and now you're surprised she cheated on you?

It's hard to feel sorry for stupid. Let me guess, you were going to be the one to change her, right?
Posted by JudgeHolden
Gila River
Member since Jan 2008
18566 posts
Posted on 11/18/17 at 3:28 am to
He’s pretty much admitted it was a dumbass move. Cut him some slack.
Posted by saint tiger225
San Diego
Member since Jan 2011
35348 posts
Posted on 11/18/17 at 3:32 am to
I haven't read the thread, just saw someone quote that and went to his original post.

Stupidity doesn't deserve slack, especially when you bring this to the OT.
Posted by JudgeHolden
Gila River
Member since Jan 2008
18566 posts
Posted on 11/18/17 at 3:40 am to
quote:

Stupidity doesn't deserve slack, especially when you bring this to the OT.


Ordinarily true. But OP is a very solid poster during hurricanes IIRC. He’s a no bullshite dude. Sounds like he got wrapped up with a bad un.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
58549 posts
Posted on 11/18/17 at 4:42 am to
quote:

It’s hard for me to see these rules as a government overreach.


Because the government can force that servitude even when you can prove the child isn’t yours. That is overreach.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 11/18/17 at 5:28 am to
quote:

saint tiger225
Forty pages late, but the OT has finally showed up.
Posted by otowntiger
O-Town
Member since Jan 2004
15648 posts
Posted on 11/18/17 at 5:41 am to
quote:

hite dude. All I can say is be happy you found out before you married her. Start making moves to get your share of time with your kid. Seriously, start calling family lawyers tomorrow.
whether you married her or not, the biggest thing is that you have a child together. It’s funny that you say good thing hedidn’t marry her. What does that matter now, lol? The damage is done. He’s forever connected to this woman now.
Jump to page
Page First 38 39 40 41 42 ... 44
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 40 of 44Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram