- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: My dog attacked a smaller dog & hurt it
Posted on 1/1/14 at 4:37 pm to Rouge
Posted on 1/1/14 at 4:37 pm to Rouge
You said negligence. Both parties were negligent, if you apply your standard fairly.
And, LE's dog has never had aggression issues, so he has no prior knowledge of aggressive behavior. We can't say that about the dachshund yet.
And, LE's dog has never had aggression issues, so he has no prior knowledge of aggressive behavior. We can't say that about the dachshund yet.
0
Posted on 1/1/14 at 4:39 pm to Warfarer
quote:
and that is the problem, how do you know if your dog was responsible? If you put your dog, or child for that matter, in bad situations don't get angry when bad things happen. If you have a small dog, don't put it around big dogs that they aren't familiar with. That is being an irresponsible pet owner. I don't know the whole story here so I can't really say who was at fault or not but neither of my dogs leave my house not on a leash and I am aware of everything around them when I have them on a leash.
I am glad you are a responsible pet owner!
I am just saying....if my large dog mauled a smaller dog I would pay for its medical bills, pretty much regardless of what started it. 
Posted on 1/1/14 at 4:40 pm to lsu480
quote:I see your humor, but provocation will be near impossible to prove
Ya but who started it? I mean his dog could have been acting in self-defense and we all know how that plays out in Florida!
Both parties had reasonable responsibility to ensure that dogs behave. Lester unfortunately did not fulfill this responsibility, and a loss of still unundetermined nature has occurred.
Posted on 1/1/14 at 4:41 pm to Rouge
love how rouge is now a dog court expert. when is your day time court tv show coming to Animal Planet?
Posted on 1/1/14 at 4:41 pm to Rouge
And why are you assuming the dachsund's owner fulfilled that responsibility? That's a pretty ignorant assumption.
Posted on 1/1/14 at 4:42 pm to Hermit Crab
You mad because I diagree ehen I say that lester did not fulfill his responsibilities as a pet owner?
Posted on 1/1/14 at 4:42 pm to Hermit Crab
They gonna sue for emotional distress. A cool $2 million would maybe allow me to move past the mauling of my beloved sausage dog
This post was edited on 1/1/14 at 4:43 pm
Posted on 1/1/14 at 4:44 pm to Rouge
quote:
I see your humor, but provocation will be near impossible to prove
Both parties had reasonable responsibility to ensure that dogs behave. Lester unfortunately did not fulfill this responsibility, and a loss of still unundetermined nature has occurred.
shite...you know I am hilarious! Yes we don't know what he may owe but I do know he isn't going to have to put his dog down unless he chooses to.
Posted on 1/1/14 at 4:45 pm to SabiDojo
quote:because lester's dog is not dying. That's why. Lester's property is not damaged and he did not take the full precautions to ensure that his property could not bring harm to others.
And why are you assuming the dachsund's owner fulfilled that responsibility? That's a pretty ignorant assumption.
Posted on 1/1/14 at 4:46 pm to Rouge
Rouge - you're not answering what many people pointed out, the negligence on the other owner for having the dachshund off the leash. If you're going to be a dog court attorney, you need to respond to that one.
Posted on 1/1/14 at 4:46 pm to Rouge
quote:
because lester's dog is not dying. That's why. Lester's property is not damaged and he did not take the full precautions to ensure that his property could not bring harm to others.
I think, I least I hope, we all know LEs dog is the one responsible for the attack.
Posted on 1/1/14 at 4:47 pm to lsu480
This whole thread is ridiculous. The dogs got in a fight. They're not humans, they're frickin dogs. Lester, pay their medical bills and call it a day.
Their threatening to sue or demand to put your dog down is simply an emotional overreaction. I'd tell them to frick themselves and to be happy you even offered to pay medical bill.
Their threatening to sue or demand to put your dog down is simply an emotional overreaction. I'd tell them to frick themselves and to be happy you even offered to pay medical bill.
This post was edited on 1/1/14 at 4:48 pm
Posted on 1/1/14 at 4:47 pm to Rouge
quote:
because lester's dog is not dying
That does not answer my question.
So, according to you, I can have a dog with a history of aggressive behavior, know this as fact, and still win a law suit because my dog got killed by a bigger dog.
So, in your scenario, the owner of the weaker animal always wins.
This post was edited on 1/1/14 at 4:49 pm
Posted on 1/1/14 at 4:48 pm to Rouge
george zimmerman isn't the one that died either but it turns out that trayvon was the negligent one, answer that rouge.
Posted on 1/1/14 at 4:48 pm to Addison Tiger
quote:fair enough
the negligence on the other owner for having the dachshund off the leash. If you're going to be a dog court attorney, you need to respond to that one.
Show me the injuries to lesters dog that provoked him to attack the smaller dog. Much like with humans, being an a-hole is not enough reason to warrant an arse whipping
If les' dog is hurt, then both parties walk away to tend to their own damages
Posted on 1/1/14 at 4:49 pm to SabiDojo
quote:
That does not answer my question.
So, according to you, I can have a dog with a history of aggressive behavior, know this as fact, and still win a law suit because my dog got killed by a bigger dog.
Come on bro...we have no proof the little shite dog has a history of aggressive behavior.
Posted on 1/1/14 at 4:50 pm to Rouge
Lol. If you are a lawyer, I hope you resign from the practice of law.
Posted on 1/1/14 at 4:50 pm to Rouge
quote:
Much like with humans, being an a-hole is not enough reason to warrant an arse whipping
I disagree
Posted on 1/1/14 at 4:50 pm to Lester Earl
Wire haired pointers are crazy bird dogs Lester. They arent bred for beaches. Pay the dudes vet bill.
Posted on 1/1/14 at 4:50 pm to SabiDojo
quote:ditto
If you are a lawyer, I hope you resign from the practice of law.
Page 8 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News