- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 1/14/22 at 6:42 am to mattz1122
quote:
This is what happens when society shuns the church.
Truer words never spoken. I love going to church and feel great afterwards.
Posted on 1/14/22 at 6:53 am to Joshjrn
quote:
Are plural marriages forbidden in the Bible? If so, where?
Lightening will prob strike me down today, but wasn’t Abraham’s wife the OG lady-cuck?
This post was edited on 1/14/22 at 6:56 am
Posted on 1/14/22 at 6:56 am to Joshjrn
should’ve known you’d twist the conversation this direction. …
Posted on 1/14/22 at 6:59 am to tiggerthetooth
Conservatives taking issue with the decisions of consenting adults.
If you don't see the humor in this, I can't help you.
If you don't see the humor in this, I can't help you.
Posted on 1/14/22 at 7:00 am to tiggerthetooth
quote:
My Daughter's Married Boyfriend shouldn't join us on vacation, right?
A question only a leftist would ask
Posted on 1/14/22 at 7:03 am to Rouge
quote:
Conservatives taking issue with the decisions of consenting adults.
Conservatives write the New York Times asking for advice?
Posted on 1/14/22 at 7:04 am to Klark Kent
quote:
should’ve known you’d twist the conversation this direction. …
Twist? A large portion of this thread are posters saying that this shows a lack of religion or godliness. Based on the language used, it seems most are Christians. So, I’m asking whether their objection is to the polyamorous aspect in general, or simply to the fact that they aren’t married. And if to polyamory in general, what their biblical basis for that was. In what way is that twisting anything?
Posted on 1/14/22 at 7:12 am to tiggerthetooth
That's where we are today...sad state, isn't it?
Posted on 1/14/22 at 7:17 am to USMEagles
Government = bad
2000 year old book written by Middle Easterners = good
2000 year old book written by Middle Easterners = good
Posted on 1/14/22 at 7:18 am to Joshjrn
quote:
Twist? A large portion of this thread are posters saying that this shows a lack of religion or godliness. Based on the language used, it seems most are Christians. So, I’m asking whether their objection is to the polyamorous aspect in general, or simply to the fact that they aren’t married. And if to polyamory in general, what their biblical basis for that was. In what way is that twisting anything?
Correct, it's adultery because they're unmarried. The Bible contains plenty of warnings and stories of trouble that can arise from multiple wives, but it doesn't explicitly prohibit it. An oft-cited passage in Timothy appears to endorse monogamy, among others.
Posted on 1/14/22 at 7:19 am to Rouge
quote:
Government = bad
2000 year old book written by Middle Easterners = good
pretty much yeah
Posted on 1/14/22 at 7:21 am to Rouge
quote:
Conservatives taking issue with the decisions of consenting adults.
You really are a daft human being if you don't see the ills produced by a polyamorous lifestyle down the road, not to mention why it exists in the first place. I guess this requires an honest take on human nature, which can change based on your politics.
It's especially funny to see you take this side considering all of the bizarre sexual fetishes present today, fetishes that don't help anything in society while being pushed on children.
In the end it's all just a selfish pursuit of short term sexual fulfillment at the expense of long term fulfillment.
Posted on 1/14/22 at 7:23 am to tiggerthetooth
Hey Mom, Newsflash: If your daughter is involved in this relationship you did something wrong long before now....
Posted on 1/14/22 at 7:25 am to tiggerthetooth
quote:
tiggerthetooth
You're acting like all of this is new. All these things have been going on since the dawn of man. Congrats on just now pulling your head out of the sand.
Posted on 1/14/22 at 7:27 am to tiggerthetooth
My idiot arse leftist brother is currently "dating" a woman that is polyamorous. He told my little brother and myself that "this is the one I want to marry."
I had to contain myself from informing him that she was using the term "polyamorous" as a form of justifying her whorish behavior. Just had to go with the old tried and true "those relationships rarely end well."
What a fricking cuck.
I had to contain myself from informing him that she was using the term "polyamorous" as a form of justifying her whorish behavior. Just had to go with the old tried and true "those relationships rarely end well."
What a fricking cuck.
Posted on 1/14/22 at 7:28 am to Rouge
quote:
You're acting like all of this is new. All these things have been going on since the dawn of man. Congrats on just now pulling your head out of the sand.
Doesn’t change the fact that cheaters are people unworthy of respect.
Posted on 1/14/22 at 7:29 am to Rouge
quote:
You're acting like all of this is new. All these things have been going on since the dawn of man. Congrats on just now pulling your head out of the sand.
Yep, there’s always been (and always will be) abnormal.
What’s the reason for trying to make it normal, though? Is there perhaps a historical/societal reason as to why it’s abnormal?
Posted on 1/14/22 at 7:33 am to Rouge
quote:
You're acting like all of this is new. All these things have been going on since the dawn of man. Congrats on just now pulling your head out of the sand.
I never said it was new. I'm saying these behaviors only cause societal destabilization and destruction. There's a reason many successful civilizations were still majority monogamous. It was the most efficient form to grow your society (raise children from weakness to strength to being capable of raising the next generation).
Aside from that, polyamory didn't have a sexual gratification root even when it was prominent. It was more about maintain bloodlines/political power and not just having an extra sex partner like some idiotic teenage porn fantasy.
As with everything in our modern society, the western practice of polyamory is more of a fun little role playing for some quick fun sex based on pornographic views on sex interaction.
I hate to break it to you, but humans don't have dicks and vaginas for brain chemical release. There's an end game to sex...procreation and rearing of children. If you have no children, you have no society, if you raise poor children, you have no future.
Polyamory in modern times disregards both the future of your society as it disregards why sex exists, and it neither respects what children need for proper raising because it's a sex based and not child based relationship.
Modern polyamory is a dead end practice and just because it existed, doesn't mean it should continue to exist. Although there will always be idiots like in the article that arrogantly believe they've got the right form down.
This post was edited on 1/14/22 at 7:35 am
Posted on 1/14/22 at 7:34 am to Pettifogger
quote:
Correct, it's adultery because they're unmarried. The Bible contains plenty of warnings and stories of trouble that can arise from multiple wives, but it doesn't explicitly prohibit it. An oft-cited passage in Timothy appears to endorse monogamy, among others.
Agree on all counts, including the presence of passages that very much imply that monogamy is socially preferable. But to go back to my first post on this thread, I’m not aware of anything that can be cited to support that it would be unChristian/irreligious/etc if the daughter married the guy.
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News