- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: My Brother In Law caught his 16 y/o daughter parking with her boyfriend
Posted on 1/7/18 at 8:30 am to Evil Little Thing
Posted on 1/7/18 at 8:30 am to Evil Little Thing
Yep
Then again I've gotten as fat as Ron Jeremy
Sex is only for the good looking people
Then again I've gotten as fat as Ron Jeremy
Sex is only for the good looking people
Posted on 1/7/18 at 8:33 am to m2pro
quote:It's not like a prowler or burglar. He's under no threat. Depending on his tone and implications, in LA he was near the ballpark of committing aggravated assault.
Until she s 18, the man is well within his rights to scare away anyone he chooses from his daughter
Posted on 1/7/18 at 8:36 am to chalmetteowl
And also, shouldn't the OT be happy that a dad is being a dad and looking after his daughter? It's easier to be a parent of a teenage son bc you only have to worry about one guy, rather than all of them
Posted on 1/7/18 at 8:36 am to m2pro
It doesn't warrant approaching a kid with a firearm. Get with the parents and both parties talk their kids to make sure they are doing this responsibly.
Posted on 1/7/18 at 8:36 am to jmarto1
quote:
I'd have a serious problem with someone approaching my kid with a firearm like that
No shite. Someone waves a Glock around my son they're going to get the barrel of a Glock in their mouth
Your BIL is a gigantic pussy
This post was edited on 1/7/18 at 8:38 am
Posted on 1/7/18 at 8:39 am to Tigahs24Seven
Your brother in law is a tool.
Passively threatening a kid for doing what is natural for kids to do is fricking dumb.
I hope the boys Dad shows up and beats his arse or the boy himself does
Passively threatening a kid for doing what is natural for kids to do is fricking dumb.
I hope the boys Dad shows up and beats his arse or the boy himself does
Posted on 1/7/18 at 8:39 am to chalmetteowl
quote:
shouldn't the OT be happy that a dad is being a dad and looking after his daughter?
It’s all in show if this is how he handles these situations. He’s delusional if he thinks he had any impact whatsoever on her having sex or not.
I’m not saying parents shouldn’t have very frank discussions with their kids about sex. I’m saying this route is pointless & makes him look like a douchebag.
This post was edited on 1/7/18 at 8:40 am
Posted on 1/7/18 at 8:40 am to Tigahs24Seven
Douche move, especially if it was with her boyfriend. Next time he’s gonna catch her getting trained by the whole football team because of this.
Posted on 1/7/18 at 8:42 am to Tigahs24Seven
How much did they do while parked?
Posted on 1/7/18 at 8:45 am to Pectus
quote:
How much did they do while parked?
Go jerk off somewhere else pedophile
Posted on 1/7/18 at 8:47 am to Houma Sapien
I"ve never parked before, so it could have just been talking to heavy petting at third base.
Posted on 1/7/18 at 8:49 am to Jake88
quote:
It's not like a prowler or burglar. He's under no threat. Depending on his tone and implications, in LA he was near the ballpark of committing aggravated assault.
LOL. Maybe in your America.
In reality, he was reacting to a serious potential financial and health risk of his daughter to a kid that is too young to handle the responsibility. He's protecting his own.
Again, not the approach id take, but let's not demonize a guy without all of the facts.
Example: is the kid a drug dealer? Probably not, but we don't know.
Example 2: has the dad been on record with this type of behavior before?
Example 3: was he calm whem he was speaking to the kid or not?
And even if all of those examples (among a litany of other potential examples) pointing in the kid's favor, a law abiding citizen / good man has every right to scare the daylights out of horrible decision making of his daughter and her would be suitors.
Again, I think this will only make things worse for him in the future, and is certainly not the method I'd take myself. But there's a lot at stake for bad decisions made by the daughter.
This post was edited on 1/7/18 at 8:51 am
Posted on 1/7/18 at 8:52 am to Tigahs24Seven
If it were my son in the car me and your brother in law would have words
Posted on 1/7/18 at 8:53 am to Tigahs24Seven
That was stupid of your brother in law. If his daughter and boyfriend were going to do something, does he really think they would do it in his driveway? A glock? You’re BIL needs counseling.
Posted on 1/7/18 at 8:55 am to m2pro
quote:
a law abiding citizen / good man has every right to scare the daylights out of horrible decision making of his daughter and her would be suitors.
Anyone who needs a gun to do this is not a real man. Not surprised someone from Alabama has not problem with this situation.
Posted on 1/7/18 at 8:56 am to Tigahs24Seven
BIL needs to invest in one of these if he doesn't want his dating 16 yr old to have sex. 

Posted on 1/7/18 at 8:57 am to m2pro
quote:Total crap. Wouldn't fly in court.
In reality, he was reacting to a serious potential financial and health risk of his daughter to a kid that is too young to handle the responsibility. He's protecting his own
quote:A right? Not hardly. Especially not while brandishing a weapon and making an implied threat that he could easily carry out. That's called Aggravated Assault.
And even if all of those examples (among a litany of other potential examples) pointing in the kid's favor, a law abiding citizen / good man has every right to scare the daylights out of horrible decision making of his daughter and her would be suitors
Posted on 1/7/18 at 8:59 am to Houma Sapien
quote:
Anyone who needs a gun to do this is not a real man.
I never implied this. Not surprising that someone from wherever you're from assumes stuff and has reading comprehension issues.
Posted on 1/7/18 at 9:00 am to sealawyer
Well if the gun as in his waistband, it's not brandishing so while dumb it's not
Posted on 1/7/18 at 9:03 am to Jake88
quote:
Total crap. Wouldn't fly in court.
Are you a lawyer?
quote:
A right? Not hardly. Especially not while brandishing a weapon and making an implied threat that he could easily carry out. That's called Aggravated Assault
I would argue that the initial threat was on his daughter's well being, and therefore makes the man's actions defined as a REaction. But not an illegal one. A reaction meaning it's not aggravated assault since it is more of a defense to a situation, a deterrent. Not necessarily a credible threat.
This post was edited on 1/7/18 at 9:04 am
Popular
Back to top


0








