Started By
Message

re: My Brother In Law caught his 16 y/o daughter parking with her boyfriend

Posted on 1/7/18 at 8:30 am to
Posted by lsucoonass
shreveport and east texas
Member since Nov 2003
70143 posts
Posted on 1/7/18 at 8:30 am to
Yep
Then again I've gotten as fat as Ron Jeremy
Sex is only for the good looking people
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
80871 posts
Posted on 1/7/18 at 8:33 am to
quote:

Until she s 18, the man is well within his rights to scare away anyone he chooses from his daughter
It's not like a prowler or burglar. He's under no threat. Depending on his tone and implications, in LA he was near the ballpark of committing aggravated assault.
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
55432 posts
Posted on 1/7/18 at 8:36 am to
And also, shouldn't the OT be happy that a dad is being a dad and looking after his daughter? It's easier to be a parent of a teenage son bc you only have to worry about one guy, rather than all of them
Posted by jmarto1
Houma, LA/ Las Vegas, NV
Member since Mar 2008
39275 posts
Posted on 1/7/18 at 8:36 am to
It doesn't warrant approaching a kid with a firearm. Get with the parents and both parties talk their kids to make sure they are doing this responsibly.
Posted by Houma Sapien
up the bayou
Member since Jul 2013
1688 posts
Posted on 1/7/18 at 8:36 am to
quote:

I'd have a serious problem with someone approaching my kid with a firearm like that


No shite. Someone waves a Glock around my son they're going to get the barrel of a Glock in their mouth

Your BIL is a gigantic pussy
This post was edited on 1/7/18 at 8:38 am
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
61736 posts
Posted on 1/7/18 at 8:39 am to
Your brother in law is a tool.

Passively threatening a kid for doing what is natural for kids to do is fricking dumb.

I hope the boys Dad shows up and beats his arse or the boy himself does
Posted by Evil Little Thing
Member since Jul 2013
11638 posts
Posted on 1/7/18 at 8:39 am to
quote:

shouldn't the OT be happy that a dad is being a dad and looking after his daughter?


It’s all in show if this is how he handles these situations. He’s delusional if he thinks he had any impact whatsoever on her having sex or not.

I’m not saying parents shouldn’t have very frank discussions with their kids about sex. I’m saying this route is pointless & makes him look like a douchebag.
This post was edited on 1/7/18 at 8:40 am
Posted by TigahJay
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2015
11403 posts
Posted on 1/7/18 at 8:40 am to
Douche move, especially if it was with her boyfriend. Next time he’s gonna catch her getting trained by the whole football team because of this.
Posted by Pectus
Internet
Member since Apr 2010
67302 posts
Posted on 1/7/18 at 8:42 am to
How much did they do while parked?
Posted by Houma Sapien
up the bayou
Member since Jul 2013
1688 posts
Posted on 1/7/18 at 8:45 am to
quote:

How much did they do while parked?


Go jerk off somewhere else pedophile
Posted by Pectus
Internet
Member since Apr 2010
67302 posts
Posted on 1/7/18 at 8:47 am to
I"ve never parked before, so it could have just been talking to heavy petting at third base.
Posted by m2pro
Member since Nov 2008
30093 posts
Posted on 1/7/18 at 8:49 am to
quote:

It's not like a prowler or burglar. He's under no threat. Depending on his tone and implications, in LA he was near the ballpark of committing aggravated assault.



LOL. Maybe in your America.

In reality, he was reacting to a serious potential financial and health risk of his daughter to a kid that is too young to handle the responsibility. He's protecting his own.

Again, not the approach id take, but let's not demonize a guy without all of the facts.

Example: is the kid a drug dealer? Probably not, but we don't know.

Example 2: has the dad been on record with this type of behavior before?

Example 3: was he calm whem he was speaking to the kid or not?

And even if all of those examples (among a litany of other potential examples) pointing in the kid's favor, a law abiding citizen / good man has every right to scare the daylights out of horrible decision making of his daughter and her would be suitors.

Again, I think this will only make things worse for him in the future, and is certainly not the method I'd take myself. But there's a lot at stake for bad decisions made by the daughter.
This post was edited on 1/7/18 at 8:51 am
Posted by yellowfin
Coastal Bar
Member since May 2006
99045 posts
Posted on 1/7/18 at 8:52 am to
If it were my son in the car me and your brother in law would have words
Posted by Isabelle81
NEW ORLEANS, LA
Member since Sep 2015
2718 posts
Posted on 1/7/18 at 8:53 am to
That was stupid of your brother in law. If his daughter and boyfriend were going to do something, does he really think they would do it in his driveway? A glock? You’re BIL needs counseling.
Posted by Houma Sapien
up the bayou
Member since Jul 2013
1688 posts
Posted on 1/7/18 at 8:55 am to
quote:

a law abiding citizen / good man has every right to scare the daylights out of horrible decision making of his daughter and her would be suitors.


Anyone who needs a gun to do this is not a real man. Not surprised someone from Alabama has not problem with this situation.
Posted by Johnny Carson
Member since Jul 2010
1323 posts
Posted on 1/7/18 at 8:56 am to
BIL needs to invest in one of these if he doesn't want his dating 16 yr old to have sex.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
80871 posts
Posted on 1/7/18 at 8:57 am to
quote:


In reality, he was reacting to a serious potential financial and health risk of his daughter to a kid that is too young to handle the responsibility. He's protecting his own
Total crap. Wouldn't fly in court.
quote:

And even if all of those examples (among a litany of other potential examples) pointing in the kid's favor, a law abiding citizen / good man has every right to scare the daylights out of horrible decision making of his daughter and her would be suitors
A right? Not hardly. Especially not while brandishing a weapon and making an implied threat that he could easily carry out. That's called Aggravated Assault.
Posted by m2pro
Member since Nov 2008
30093 posts
Posted on 1/7/18 at 8:59 am to
quote:

Anyone who needs a gun to do this is not a real man.


I never implied this. Not surprising that someone from wherever you're from assumes stuff and has reading comprehension issues.
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
74913 posts
Posted on 1/7/18 at 9:00 am to
Well if the gun as in his waistband, it's not brandishing so while dumb it's not
Posted by m2pro
Member since Nov 2008
30093 posts
Posted on 1/7/18 at 9:03 am to
quote:

Total crap. Wouldn't fly in court.


Are you a lawyer?

quote:

A right? Not hardly. Especially not while brandishing a weapon and making an implied threat that he could easily carry out. That's called Aggravated Assault


I would argue that the initial threat was on his daughter's well being, and therefore makes the man's actions defined as a REaction. But not an illegal one. A reaction meaning it's not aggravated assault since it is more of a defense to a situation, a deterrent. Not necessarily a credible threat.
This post was edited on 1/7/18 at 9:04 am
Jump to page
Page First 4 5 6 7 8 ... 18
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 18Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram