re: Melanie Curtin is Now a Free Woman - Appeal Overturned

Is that pic the preview of a bangbus interview?

quote:

---

So if she posted a surety bond before and went through the trial and all of that, she now has to potentially put another up?

---

Generally speaking, a commercial surety is a one off. Think of it less like general insurance and more like insuring a single event. Once that event has occurred, your insurance is done, even if that event needs to be done over.

If she made a cash or property bond, she can just put it up again. If she went surety, then most likely, she would have to post it again.

I read some of the case today and from what I understand, her and Perkins were having a sexual relationship since 2013. The video they found of Perkins and her doing sex acts to Perkins' wife when she appeared to be unconscious was in 2014.

So the reason she got off is because the video doesn't prove the wife was unconscious nor does it prove that she was acting not under the influence of any substance that might have been put in her drink or something?

Go for it bub.

So what's the cliffs on the story?

This isn’t her. This was Perkins girl.

quote:

---

Plus, just replace her with a dreadlocked hood rat and ask how you would feel about her actions, or a trailer trash methhead with face tats.

---

Remind me what she did? I do not remember the tale.

quote:

---

A freak is still a freak at the end of the day

---

That is how I read this..... I just hope the Orange didn't make a New Black.

From another poster:

quote:

---

Joshjrn quote: Did the victim's credibility play any role? I thought the main evidence was a video of the incident (which speaks for itself). Just finished the opinion. The very short version is that the video cuts in during the act, so there's no evidence of whether she consented or didn't consent. She testified that she has no recollection of that night, so she can't testify to consent either way. However, she testified that, as a categorical, she would never consent to a threesome and allow it to be filmed. However, there was evidence that was kept out that she had previously engaged in filmed sex with multiple people, engaged in filmed sex with masks, and the later found affidavit outlines that she had had group sex with multiple other couples. While none of that contradicts the video itself, it does potentially undermine her testimony that, in spite of the fact that she can't say she didn't consent, she can say with certainty that she would never consent under those circumstances.

---

LINK

LINK