- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Mayweather-McGregor pirated by upward of 100 million viewers
Posted on 8/28/17 at 7:37 pm to 632627
Posted on 8/28/17 at 7:37 pm to 632627
quote:
Doubt the pirated streams cost them much revenue.
exactly. i only watched because i happened to be on the computer and that time and was given a link.
and even then, i missed the TKO.
Posted on 8/28/17 at 7:40 pm to LSUSUPERSTAR
I watched on Periscope just because it was available. I wouldn't have watched it otherwise much less paid to watch it.
Posted on 8/28/17 at 7:41 pm to redstick13
quote:
I watched on Periscope just because it was available. I wouldn't have watched it otherwise much less paid to watch it.
Same here. Watched it on my phone at work. They wouldn't have gotten a dime from me anyway.
Posted on 8/28/17 at 7:47 pm to onelochevy
Watched on periscope. Would not have bought other wise
Days of me paying for PPV fights are long over.
Days of me paying for PPV fights are long over.
Posted on 8/28/17 at 7:47 pm to hawgfaninc

Posted on 8/28/17 at 7:47 pm to onelochevy
The ability of people to use social media and other tech to easily bypass Pay Per View is like when Napster hit the music biz and their high-priced CDs.
There is going to be some shakeout and adjustment. I think the whole PPV model will change in the next year or two.
There is going to be some shakeout and adjustment. I think the whole PPV model will change in the next year or two.
Posted on 8/28/17 at 8:00 pm to hawgfaninc
Should have put it on YouTube for 9.99. Would have made more $ imho
Posted on 8/28/17 at 8:03 pm to ThatMakesSense
quote:
Because no one deserves to be paid 100 million dollars to participate in a fight.
Why do you hate capitalism, commie?
Posted on 8/28/17 at 8:06 pm to hawgfaninc
Boxing and its pay per view model for all its biggest fights is one of the most short sighted things ever. It likely did as much to kill the sport's popularity as anything.
Posted on 8/28/17 at 8:11 pm to hawgfaninc
If they charged like $5 bucks for it theyd make more money, just pay the boxers less. Mcgrehor was on welfare before so they could probably just pay him in beer. Like all you have to do to be a pro boxer is fight like a regular dude but weigh 112 pounds
Posted on 8/28/17 at 8:22 pm to jdeval1
quote:
I watched it on social media but I wouldn't have paid for it otherwise. They didn't lose any money on me.
Ditto, I was not ever going to pay to watch that fight. No way no how.
Posted on 8/28/17 at 8:25 pm to 632627
quote:
I'm pretty sure the people that pirated it were those unwilling to pay for it, or in other words, only willing to watch for free.
100% of them?
Nah. There is some cost that is legitimate. Obviously, it's not all of the pirated streams. But, some percentage is lost revenue.
The only way to stop this is to prosecute it.
Posted on 8/28/17 at 8:30 pm to hawgfaninc
Paid for it,
I'm not a poor.
I'm not a poor.
Posted on 8/28/17 at 8:32 pm to hawgfaninc
Pirate here. $100 for 30 mins of entertainment is a ripoff
Posted on 8/28/17 at 8:44 pm to hawgfaninc
Too bad Mayweather can't read the handwriting on the wall...
Posted on 8/28/17 at 8:46 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
those two streams alone could cost the event more than $70.6 million.
They paid Mayweather and McGregor a combined 300,000,000 for that fight.
Posted on 8/28/17 at 9:35 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
those two streams alone could cost the event more than $70.6 million.
I guess that is true if every viewer would have bought the right in their own. But most people are getting 10 or more people together to watch the fight. So 70.6 million might be a bit off.
Posted on 8/28/17 at 9:36 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
Just the viewership from those two streams alone could cost the event more than $70.6 million.
That's not true unless you assume every one of those viewers would have paid for it if they couldn't pirate it. I doubt very many of them would have.
Posted on 8/28/17 at 9:42 pm to junkfunky
quote:
Looks like us and Canada were expected to subsidize the rest of the world.
We talked about that as we were getting ready to go arrrgggghhh.
It's crazy that companies always seem to make the most off of the back of Americans.
Pharmaceuticals are even worse.
Popular
Back to top
