Started By
Message

re: Mayor Sweep is maddd

Posted on 3/19/18 at 3:56 pm to
Posted by J Murdah
Member since Jun 2008
40232 posts
Posted on 3/19/18 at 3:56 pm to
Nobody wants to go to Baker to look at animals.
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
135036 posts
Posted on 3/19/18 at 4:07 pm to
NBR is already a zoo
Posted by mikelbr
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2008
49099 posts
Posted on 3/19/18 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

the Zoo is garbage as it sits now. whether they redo it, or move it, I don't care, but please do something.




I took my kids to the BR Zoo last week. It's very sad to see the state of the zoo and the potential it has.

Moving it is a complete waste of money and pandering to the whiteflight.

Spend money wisely and improve the existing location. Common sense needs to prevail.
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
135036 posts
Posted on 3/19/18 at 4:12 pm to
quote:

Spend money wisely and improve the existing location.

The location it is in now is one of the reasons it has low attendance and is in such poor shape.
Posted by PapaPogey
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2008
40532 posts
Posted on 3/19/18 at 4:16 pm to
More of a waste of money than it is currently?
Posted by Skillet
Member since Aug 2006
114468 posts
Posted on 3/19/18 at 4:17 pm to
quote:

The location it is in now is one of the reasons it has low attendance and is in such poor shape.





The location is the main reason. No one wants to drive to shitty Baker.

Move the zoo to a better area, spend the money to make it nice, and it will prosper.
Posted by dagrippa
Saigon
Member since Nov 2004
12171 posts
Posted on 3/19/18 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

I'm opposed to the move as well. It's a gigantic waste of money.


Then shut it down.
Posted by tigerinthebueche
Member since Oct 2010
38239 posts
Posted on 3/19/18 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

Moving it is a complete waste of money and pandering to the whiteflight.



not necessarily. If the desired improvements can be made at a lower cost via a new location as opposed to the existing one, then its not really a waste of money. I can see BREC opting to go invest in a new facility as opposed to putting money into the old one. Especially if the old infrastructure is obsolete.
Posted by Jester
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
34717 posts
Posted on 3/19/18 at 4:31 pm to
Just get rid of it altogether. I can drive a bit farther and go to the Audubon Zoo. I have no need to subsidize that dump.
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
122534 posts
Posted on 3/19/18 at 4:41 pm to
If Baton Rouge is going to continue having a zoo, it should be moved. Why is it so important to North Baton Rouge that it stays there? I wasn't the zoo was so popular with the people of that area.

Put it where it will get a lot more traffic... No somewhere way out the way of everything.
Posted by Indfanfromcol
LSU
Member since Jan 2011
14935 posts
Posted on 3/19/18 at 4:43 pm to
quote:

Serious question - what are her arguments for why it should stay in NBR other than its racist to move it?




I have not read anything for or against moving the zoo, but I'm going to take a wild guess here and say....the money it would cost to move? Seems pretty obvious.
Posted by tom
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2007
8824 posts
Posted on 3/19/18 at 6:26 pm to
quote:

I can see BREC opting to go invest in a new facility as opposed to putting money into the old one.

A major, major driver for this is that BREC thinks it can pass another dedicated tax to pay for the move. If that didn't happen, no way they would actually attempt to move the zoo.
Posted by fallguy_1978
Best States #50
Member since Feb 2018
53837 posts
Posted on 3/19/18 at 6:29 pm to
BREC's study found the cost of relocating it about the same as renovating it where it is. Not sure how accurate that is.

BREC
Posted by meangene323
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
882 posts
Posted on 3/19/18 at 6:34 pm to
I would guess that it would probaby be the same cost to build a new zoo on free property than to house animals while they renovate the existing location. Add to it the fact that they will get more visitors in the new location and people are more likely to pay a tax for a location that is newer and closer to them.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram