- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 8/8/20 at 6:12 pm to hikingfan
7
Posted on 8/8/20 at 6:23 pm to hikingfan
This dude really trying to break the universe with math in 2020
Posted on 8/8/20 at 6:25 pm to hikingfan
Posted on 8/8/20 at 6:26 pm to Brosef Stalin
quote:Brains Strowman figured it out a long time ago with no problem.
That looks a Calc 1 problem. Not too hard to solve.
Posted on 8/8/20 at 6:28 pm to hikingfan
This might involve some mess with the concept of infinity
Infinity / 2 is still infinity.
Therefore, you can never get back down to one.
Infinity / 2 is still infinity.
Therefore, you can never get back down to one.
Posted on 8/8/20 at 6:28 pm to hikingfan
Where is Will Hunting when you need him?
Posted on 8/8/20 at 6:30 pm to hikingfan
I swear Mathematicians are retarded.
Posted on 8/8/20 at 6:32 pm to hikingfan
Zero isn't real and pine cone spirals.
Posted on 8/8/20 at 6:38 pm to hikingfan
So if it’s a riddle, someone created it with an “answer” in mind... right?
Mathematic riddles are not like typical word/language riddles where, if given the right explanation, a person could say the answer is “a donkey” (or obviously whatever)
It’s not like you can ask a mathematical riddle and be like, “Hahaha, you dummy! 1 is actually 7!”
How is it possible that the “riddle” has remained unsolved for 82 fricking years?
I smell bullshite.
Mathematic riddles are not like typical word/language riddles where, if given the right explanation, a person could say the answer is “a donkey” (or obviously whatever)
It’s not like you can ask a mathematical riddle and be like, “Hahaha, you dummy! 1 is actually 7!”
How is it possible that the “riddle” has remained unsolved for 82 fricking years?
I smell bullshite.
Posted on 8/8/20 at 6:39 pm to hikingfan
quote:
Name a subject in advanced math, and he’s written about it.
Has he written the solution to the Collatz Conjecture?
Didn’t think so.
Fraud.
Posted on 8/8/20 at 6:47 pm to hikingfan
quote:
The rule is this: If the number is even, then divide it by 2, and if the number is odd, then multiply by 3 and add 1.
Isn't this the same rule for the amount of secks partners a man (vag/2) and woman (peni×3+1) has had?
Posted on 8/8/20 at 6:51 pm to hikingfan
quote:
in 2006 he won the Fields Medal
Posted on 8/8/20 at 7:00 pm to hikingfan
There are no counter examples, for frick’s sake.
Posted on 8/8/20 at 7:06 pm to Breadstick Gun
quote:
7
22 - 11 - 34 - 17 - 52 - 26 - 13 - 40 - 20 - 10....which was the example given earlier and leads to 1.
Any power of 2 takes you back to 2^0.
If n is odd 3n + 1 is even.
Posted on 8/8/20 at 7:07 pm to hikingfan
Posted on 8/8/20 at 7:08 pm to hikingfan
5
Posted on 8/8/20 at 7:36 pm to Havoc
quote:
There are no counter examples, for frick’s sake.
There are no KNOWN counter examples. It's a subtle distinction, but I'm confident that if the OT can understand PEMDAS, it can understand this.
Posted on 8/8/20 at 7:48 pm to hikingfan
How far on the spectrum do you have to be to think about that type of shite?
Posted on 8/8/20 at 7:51 pm to IAmNERD
quote:
How far on the spectrum do you have to be to think about that type of shite?
quote:name checks out
IAmNERD
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News