- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:57 am to member12
I'm sticking with 15...but the only assumption I have to make is that a single mug is half of two mugs.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:57 am to SuperSaint
quote:
Be
quote:
practical
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:58 am to member12
quote:THAT'S CRAZY!!! UNHEARD OF! NO frickING WAY!!!
a single mug is half of two mugs
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:58 am to TigerGrad2011
quote:
(No message)
Can't wait for the edit.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:58 am to TigerGrad2011
quote:
The first three variables are defined through the equations.
The fourth is never defined.
what is the 4th variable?
I can't believe people are arguing this
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:58 am to member12
There is no answer, You can't fricking assume going from a double mugged picture to a Single mugged picture defines a 2 going to a 1. fricking stupid arse shite.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:58 am to TigerGrad2011
quote:
Has nothing to do with what the mugs look like.
actually I just went back and looked at the picture:
in the 3rd line you see 2 beer mugs, but you must make the assumption that the beer mug behind the first beer mug looks exactly like the beer mug in the front.
You actually only see 2/3 of the back beer mug
So now the equation, if LNCHBOX wants his argument, should be:
5 + (z+(0.66 * z)) + (z + (0.66 * z)) = 9
(z + (0.66 * z)) + (z + (0.66 * z)) = 4
(z + 0.66z) + (z + 0.66z) = 4
1.66z + 1.66z = 4
3.32z = 4
z = 1.204819
frick ALL OF YOU
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:59 am to BaddestAndvari
quote:
actually I just went back and looked at the picture:
in the 3rd line you see 2 beer mugs, but you must make the assumption that the beer mug behind the first beer mug looks exactly like the beer mug in the front.
You actually only see 2/3 of the back beer mug
So now the equation, if LNCHBOX wants his argument, should be:
5 + (z+(0.66 * z)) + (z + (0.66 * z)) = 9
(z + (0.66 * z)) + (z + (0.66 * z)) = 4
(z + 0.66z) + (z + 0.66z) = 4
1.66z + 1.66z = 4
3.32z = 4
z = 1.204819
frick ALL OF YOU
Trying so hard.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:59 am to Chad504boy
quote:
You can't fricking assume going from a double mugged picture to a Single mugged picture defines a 2 going to a 1
Why not?
Posted on 11/18/16 at 11:00 am to TigerGrad2011
quote:
I just figured out that you are trolling us...well done sir if that was your objective. If not, I pray you don't reproduce.
Right, I'm the troll.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 11:00 am to lsupride87
I fully understand the line of thinking some of you are using to say it's undefined. Hell, I could argue that the two mugs are really C x C, so the third equation is 2(C^2)=4, so C=2^.5, and the final answer is 5+10(2^.5). However, the answer to the meme is 15 because it take the least amount of assumptions.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 11:00 am to BaddestAndvari
quote:I'd say it's 7/10.
You actually only see 2/3 of the back beer mug
Posted on 11/18/16 at 11:00 am to theunknownknight
Looks like 15 to me.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 11:01 am to member12
quote:
the only assumption I have to make is that a single mug is half of two mugs.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 11:01 am to BaddestAndvari
quote:
Has nothing to do with what the mugs look like.
actually I just went back and looked at the picture:
in the 3rd line you see 2 beer mugs, but you must make the assumption that the beer mug behind the first beer mug looks exactly like the beer mug in the front.
You actually only see 2/3 of the back beer mug
So now the equation, if LNCHBOX wants his argument, should be:
5 + (z+(0.66 * z)) + (z + (0.66 * z)) = 9
(z + (0.66 * z)) + (z + (0.66 * z)) = 4
(z + 0.66z) + (z + 0.66z) = 4
1.66z + 1.66z = 4
3.32z = 4
z = 1.204819
frick ALL OF YOU
So if we are to believe LNCHBOX
The answer to the question is:
5 + (1.204819 x 10) =
5 + 12.04819 = 17.04819
Posted on 11/18/16 at 11:02 am to captainahab
quote:
Multiply then Divide then Add then Subtract
quote:
5 + (1 x 10) = 15
or
(5 + 1) x 10 = 60
Posted on 11/18/16 at 11:02 am to ell_13
More like 98/141, imo
Posted on 11/18/16 at 11:03 am to Salmon
quote:there are two types in this thread arguing that the SAME exact picture of beer mugs doubled up isn't double the value of a single beer mug..
I can't believe people are arguing this
Those people: the one that likes to just be a contrarian and enjoys arguing, and the one that didn't even notice the mugs being doubled up and got the problem wrong and now just trying to argue against the problem.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 11:03 am to Salmon
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/14/23 at 10:57 pm
Page 16 of 26
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News