- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Math Problem: Saw this on FB and now I'm depressed
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:22 am to BaddestAndvari
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:22 am to BaddestAndvari
quote:
LNCHBOX is saying, you have to make a logic step out of algebra and actually break down z a little more, which is really dumb
The pictures are part of the problem. Replacing them with 4 variables is incorrect. There are three variables. A, B, and C. And there are 2C in the second equation. This isn't rocket science, nor is it an assumption.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:22 am to slackster
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/14/23 at 11:06 pm
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:23 am to TigerGrad2011
quote:
Two mugs is variable C, not 2C. If it were 2C, it would be two pictures of two mugs.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:23 am to Peazey
quote:
You are missing a multiplication symbol.
frick a duck... I see it now.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:23 am to TigerGrad2011
quote:
How smart is the person holding the gun to my head?
Smart enough to get the right answer.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:23 am to TigerGrad2011
quote:False. The pic of two mugs is no different than saying 2C. We are given visual cues on purpose. We are meant to see two mugs and then 1. It's not that difficult.
Two mugs is variable C, not 2C. If it were 2C, it would be two pictures of two mugs.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:24 am to TigerGrad2011
Wait - you're saying the double mug is a COMPLETELY different variable than the single mug?

Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:24 am to TigerGrad2011
quote:Yep. That is what Lynch is missing
Two mugs is variable C, not 2C. If it were 2C, it would be two pictures of two mugs.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:24 am to LNCHBOX
I'm not over complicating anything. You just refuse to understand that each picture represents a variable independent to the other variables. All you keep doing is assuming that picture 4 is mathematically related to picture 3 because they used another mug in that picture. If the picture is not the EXACT same, then the variable has no correlation to the other variables.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:24 am to theunknownknight
quote:Logically, you should.
Wait - you're saying the double mug is a COMPLETELY different variable than the single mug?
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:24 am to theunknownknight
If you want to get really technical, the answer should be inconclusive, since in math you can never fully assume things unless outright presented to you. As in, we can not assume that one beer mug symbol equals half of the two beer mug symbol
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:25 am to LNCHBOX
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/14/23 at 11:10 pm
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:25 am to monkeybutt
quote:
I'm not over complicating anything. You just refuse to understand that each picture represents a variable independent to the other variables. All you keep doing is assuming that picture 4 is mathematically related to picture 3 because they used another mug in that picture. If the picture is not the EXACT same, then the variable has no correlation to the other variables.
This post was edited on 11/18/16 at 10:26 am
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:25 am to lsupride87
And logically you shouldn't.
You're throwing the word logic around illogically
You're throwing the word logic around illogically
This post was edited on 11/18/16 at 10:27 am
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:26 am to lsupride87
I disagree. The mugs look exactly the same, just two of them. Whether you look at this from a visual perspective or a real life perspective and actually trying to figure out how much the items would really cost, the math works out to 15. Some people just seem to be upset that they were tricked and want to keep arguing their point. I was tricked too. Doesn't mean I'm gonna go full retard.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:26 am to Spaulding Smails
quote:I have no idea why anyone would argue against this. Then again,
If you want to get really technical, the answer should be inconclusive, since in math you can never fully assume things unless outright presented to you. As in, we can not assume that one beer mug symbol equals half of the two beer mug symbol
WE
GOT
LYNCH'D
Popular
Back to top


2




