Started By
Message

re: Math Problem: Saw this on FB and now I'm depressed

Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:22 am to
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89339 posts
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:22 am to
quote:

LNCHBOX is saying, you have to make a logic step out of algebra and actually break down z a little more, which is really dumb



The pictures are part of the problem. Replacing them with 4 variables is incorrect. There are three variables. A, B, and C. And there are 2C in the second equation. This isn't rocket science, nor is it an assumption.
Posted by TigerGrad2011
Member since Aug 2016
1592 posts
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:22 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/14/23 at 11:06 pm
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89339 posts
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:23 am to
quote:

Two mugs is variable C, not 2C. If it were 2C, it would be two pictures of two mugs.



Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
122522 posts
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:23 am to
quote:

You are missing a multiplication symbol.




frick a duck... I see it now.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89339 posts
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:23 am to
quote:

How smart is the person holding the gun to my head?



Smart enough to get the right answer.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
88411 posts
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:23 am to
quote:

Two mugs is variable C, not 2C. If it were 2C, it would be two pictures of two mugs.
False. The pic of two mugs is no different than saying 2C. We are given visual cues on purpose. We are meant to see two mugs and then 1. It's not that difficult.
Posted by Thib-a-doe Tiger
Member since Nov 2012
36799 posts
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:23 am to
I got 765
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
61310 posts
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:24 am to
Wait - you're saying the double mug is a COMPLETELY different variable than the single mug?













Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
112518 posts
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:24 am to
quote:

Two mugs is variable C, not 2C. If it were 2C, it would be two pictures of two mugs.
Yep. That is what Lynch is missing

Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89339 posts
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:24 am to
That's wrong.
Posted by monkeybutt
Member since Oct 2015
4584 posts
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:24 am to
I'm not over complicating anything. You just refuse to understand that each picture represents a variable independent to the other variables. All you keep doing is assuming that picture 4 is mathematically related to picture 3 because they used another mug in that picture. If the picture is not the EXACT same, then the variable has no correlation to the other variables.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
112518 posts
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:24 am to
quote:

Wait - you're saying the double mug is a COMPLETELY different variable than the single mug?
Logically, you should.
Posted by Spaulding Smails
Milano’s Bar
Member since Jun 2012
18805 posts
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:24 am to
If you want to get really technical, the answer should be inconclusive, since in math you can never fully assume things unless outright presented to you. As in, we can not assume that one beer mug symbol equals half of the two beer mug symbol
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
112518 posts
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:25 am to
quote:

That's wrong.
Nope
Posted by TigerGrad2011
Member since Aug 2016
1592 posts
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:25 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/14/23 at 11:10 pm
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89339 posts
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:25 am to
quote:

I'm not over complicating anything. You just refuse to understand that each picture represents a variable independent to the other variables. All you keep doing is assuming that picture 4 is mathematically related to picture 3 because they used another mug in that picture. If the picture is not the EXACT same, then the variable has no correlation to the other variables.



Whatever. The answer is 15, and you know it just as well as I do.
This post was edited on 11/18/16 at 10:26 am
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
61310 posts
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:25 am to
And logically you shouldn't.

You're throwing the word logic around illogically
This post was edited on 11/18/16 at 10:27 am
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89339 posts
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:25 am to
Yep.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
88411 posts
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:26 am to
I disagree. The mugs look exactly the same, just two of them. Whether you look at this from a visual perspective or a real life perspective and actually trying to figure out how much the items would really cost, the math works out to 15. Some people just seem to be upset that they were tricked and want to keep arguing their point. I was tricked too. Doesn't mean I'm gonna go full retard.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
112518 posts
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:26 am to
quote:

If you want to get really technical, the answer should be inconclusive, since in math you can never fully assume things unless outright presented to you. As in, we can not assume that one beer mug symbol equals half of the two beer mug symbol
I have no idea why anyone would argue against this. Then again,

WE
GOT

LYNCH'D
Jump to page
Page First 8 9 10 11 12 ... 26
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 26Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram