- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:27 am to TigerGrad2011
quote:No. Each ITEM is a variable. We have to determine the value of each ITEM to find the final solution.
Each picture is a variable.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:27 am to lsupride87
I'd argue against it because it's wrong.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:27 am to ell_13
quote:I have admitted I was tricked, and for the purpose of the simple equation it is 15.
I disagree. The mugs look exactly the same, just two of them. Whether you look at this from a visual perspective or a real life perspective and actually trying to figure out how much the items would really cost, the math works out to 15. Some people just seem to be upset that they were tricked and want to keep arguing their point. I was tricked too. Doesn't mean I'm gonna go full retard.
However, it cant actually be assumed in a real life math setting
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:27 am to LNCHBOX
quote:You are factually wrong
I'd argue against it because it's wrong.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:27 am to slackster
quote:
None of the above.
If that was on a linear algebra problem that's what I am picking, and would absolutely not be afraid to challenge my teacher on the assumption that the difference in variables translates to a difference in quantity.
But I also like asserting things I know are most likely not reality even though I can logically justify it
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:27 am to lsupride87
quote:
However, it cant actually be assumed in a real life math setting
A real life math setting isn't using pictures of burgers and beer.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:28 am to LNCHBOX
Your position relies on bad science, math, and use of symbols. And yes, the pictures are symbols. Your position is obviously the intention of the puzzle, but that doesn't stop the puzzle from being purposefully misleading and relying on bad science. Real use of symbols isn't deliberately misleading. For someone who claims to be coming from a perspective of being educated, you are decidedly choosing the uneducated route.
This post was edited on 11/18/16 at 10:29 am
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:28 am to TigerGrad2011
quote:
How smart is the person holding the gun to my head?
Not sure, but the source of the problem is a Facebook meme, if that helps.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:28 am to lsupride87
quote:
You are factually wrong
No, I'm not.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:28 am to ell_13
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/14/23 at 11:05 pm
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:28 am to Peazey
quote:
Your position relies on bad science, math, and use of symbols.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:28 am to LNCHBOX
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/14/23 at 11:04 pm
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:29 am to lsupride87
quote:If they pictures were simply colored boxes, I'd agree with you. But we are looking at items here. Taking the picture as a whole seems to be a bigger assumption than simply looking at each item individually as intended. I've never agreed with LUNCH until this thread, btw. I feel dirty.
However, it cant actually be assumed in a real life math setting
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:29 am to LNCHBOX
quote:Send the picture to Cal Tech. Watch them deduct it
A real life math setting isn't using pictures of burgers and beer.
Hell, my cousin went there, we can send it his way. He will spend about 40 hours on it likely
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:29 am to theunknownknight
its 25.
10 + 2 * 10
Multiplication first so 20 + 5
Edit: Lol just saw its half a mug so 10 + 5 = 15
10 + 2 * 10
Multiplication first so 20 + 5
Edit: Lol just saw its half a mug so 10 + 5 = 15
This post was edited on 11/18/16 at 10:31 am
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:29 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
The pictures are part of the problem. Replacing them with 4 variables is incorrect. There are three variables. A, B, and C. And there are 2C in the second equation. This isn't rocket science, nor is it an assumption.
Correct, it's not an assumption, but it is adding art and situation logic to an algebra problem, and my math teachers would have strung me up on a pole and left me there for days if I had pulled this kind of shite in a "Math" class
Every math problem must resolve itself perfectly, and the fact that we have 9 pages of people arguing for different answers proves this whole premise starts on a failed logic to begin with
P.S: The answer is still 15, like, there is no other answer, it's just 15 (unless of course the artist is a moron, but like I said, this was done 100% on purpose, and the artist wasn't a moron)
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:29 am to lsupride87
quote:
it cant actually be assumed in a real life math setting

Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:29 am to TigerGrad2011
quote:I don't think you know what this means. It's very, very similar to one picture in particular.
distinctively different picture
Popular
Back to top


1






