- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 6/5/18 at 5:44 am to olgoi khorkhoi
Sounds like this is evidence of a fairly recent mass extinction event. Don’t see why either side would think of it anymore than that. If it was the Great Flood, is that some big revelation? There are many ancient text that pass down a story of a global flood, so it has some credibility as a possibility. It’s also possible it could have been caused by something else, but either way I don’t see how this proves or disproves anything religious.
Posted on 6/5/18 at 5:46 am to olgoi khorkhoi
So most species of mammal appeared in the mammalian explosion within a HUNDRED THOUSAND YEAR PERIOD?
Posted on 6/5/18 at 6:03 am to Placebeaux
quote:
The people that made us made the animals as well.
Just hoping they coded in a sweet bonus world.
Posted on 6/5/18 at 7:22 am to olgoi khorkhoi
quote:
100,000 to 200,000 years ago.
In other words, the (Syfy) Battlestar Galactica story is real.
Posted on 6/5/18 at 7:23 am to olgoi khorkhoi
But, but, but....The Theory of Bullshi....I mean Evolution
Posted on 6/5/18 at 7:24 am to olgoi khorkhoi
I’m sure this thread will be an involved foray into scientific literature and not turn into a religion thread immediately 
Posted on 6/5/18 at 7:24 am to olgoi khorkhoi
You can suggest an extinction event occurred in that time frame to reset things more than God.
Posted on 6/5/18 at 7:30 am to Ross
quote:
scientific
You mean the fact that if you truly believe in the scientific method and mathematical probability, that science says it is mathematically impossible for life to exist on this planet much less on this planet and others as most of you dumbasses believe.
Life on planet Earth is a statistical anomaly!!!
Posted on 6/5/18 at 7:33 am to DannyB
quote:
You mean the fact that if you truly believe in the scientific method and mathematical probability, that science says it is mathematically impossible for life to exist on this planet much less on this planet and others as most of you dumbasses believe.
Life on planet Earth is a statistical anomaly!!!
I'll bet you love Ken Ham.
The whole scientific world are dumbasses, but you, some guy, have it all figured out.
Maybe, consider for a moment, that you might not know what you're talking about. 
Posted on 6/5/18 at 7:39 am to SEC. 593
The range of "100,000 to 200,000" years is more than you'd get if a ship dumped them all out during the life time of Noah.
Posted on 6/5/18 at 7:51 am to Teague
quote:
Maybe, consider for a moment, that you might not know what you're talking about.
the hardest thing for atheists and christians alike seems to be considering that they are wrong. It's so hard for some folks to just say "i don't know"
Posted on 6/5/18 at 8:04 am to celltech1981
I think people are really misinterpreting things here
If they're referring to 90% of animals currently on earth it would make more sense
This isn't 90% of all animals ever. Extinction events and evolution have wiped out a lot of species that no longer exist.
If they're referring to 90% of animals currently on earth it would make more sense
This isn't 90% of all animals ever. Extinction events and evolution have wiped out a lot of species that no longer exist.
Posted on 6/5/18 at 8:08 am to DannyB
quote:
But, but, but....The Theory of Bullshi....I mean Evolution
replacing old coding with new coding is not even hard for us inside the code. You guys fail to understand you are both right and wrong. Its really not that hard.
Posted on 6/5/18 at 8:28 am to olgoi khorkhoi
It's funny how creationists will embrace an article about a scientific paper without knowing anything about it other than it appears to support their view. Yet they will reject science regarding virtually every other issue.
The same can be said for the anti-vaccine and anti-GMO crowd. They generally love science re climate change, evolution and the like, but reject all of it on their pet issues.
Most humans are irrational.
The same can be said for the anti-vaccine and anti-GMO crowd. They generally love science re climate change, evolution and the like, but reject all of it on their pet issues.
Most humans are irrational.
Posted on 6/5/18 at 8:35 am to Barstools
quote:not for the theory of evolution.
100,000 years is a long time.
Posted on 6/5/18 at 8:36 am to olgoi khorkhoi
quote:
same time as humans did some 100,000 to 200,000 years ago.
Posted on 6/5/18 at 8:38 am to Powerman
quote:
This isn't 90% of all animals ever. Extinction events and evolution have wiped out a lot of species that no longer exist.
The number that gets drummed around is like 99% of all species that ever lived have gone extinct. Maybe someone like Volvagia if he's around can confirm that number.
But, otherwise this just seems to be describing a genetic bottleneck, which is pretty common throughout time.
Posted on 6/5/18 at 8:54 am to Twenty 49
quote:
It's funny how creationists will embrace an article about a scientific paper without knowing anything about it other than it appears to support their view. Yet they will reject science regarding virtually every other issue.
People do this all the time, especially when it comes to their political beliefs. They want sources that let them say "See? This just proves what I've been saying all along!" Anything that doesn't meet that goal gets ignored, and if it turns out their source didn't say what they thought it did, that gets ignored too.
Posted on 6/5/18 at 8:59 am to Cosmo
quote:
Well yeah. Genesis chapter 1
Give or take 100,000 years.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News