- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Massive Genetic Study Reveals 90 Percent Of Earth’s Animals Appeared At The Same Time
Posted on 6/4/18 at 8:40 pm to northshorebamaman
Posted on 6/4/18 at 8:40 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
That's because the study doesn't actually say what the article and many in this thread want it to say

Posted on 6/4/18 at 8:41 pm to bmy
quote:
humans have been around for around 315,000 years. there has been complex life on this planet for ~400 million years
Exactly. Bipedal hominids have been around 4.4 million
Posted on 6/4/18 at 8:42 pm to northshorebamaman
I'm trying to understand it. Is it basically saying that 100,000 - 200,000 years ago, 90% of the species on the earth were eliminated to the extent that the "clock" on these DNA barcodes reset?
Posted on 6/4/18 at 8:47 pm to SEC. 593
quote:
It is a published peer reviewed study, but you are correct this doesn't say what everyone here wants/claims it to say.
I wasn't calling the study clickbait. I'm calling the article clickbait.
Posted on 6/4/18 at 8:50 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
That's because the study doesn't actually say what the article and many in this thread want it to say. It's just click bait. It would be a massive story that we wouldn't be reading about first on Tech Times.
The study actually says that most species share mitochondrial DNA with a common ancestor within the last "several hundred thousand years" preceding population increases.
Not at all the same thing as "90 Percent Of Earth’s Animals Appeared"
In other words, when they got off the Ark, bro.
Posted on 6/4/18 at 8:51 pm to GRTiger
I'd view it that 100-200k years ago there was a niche created that allowed the species we see today to blossom while others were selected out.
Posted on 6/4/18 at 8:56 pm to olgoi khorkhoi
The people that made us made the animals as well.
Posted on 6/4/18 at 8:58 pm to Y.A. Tittle
Not replying to you...
I'd like to see their data before reading too much into this, but for the last few days at work we have been wondering how many different species and the population distribution to see where they got the 90% figure.
It was said that the big clue here is that they used "animals" and not total species to include microbes. The microbe numbers to me would have shown more impact.
I'd like to see their data before reading too much into this, but for the last few days at work we have been wondering how many different species and the population distribution to see where they got the 90% figure.
It was said that the big clue here is that they used "animals" and not total species to include microbes. The microbe numbers to me would have shown more impact.
Posted on 6/4/18 at 8:59 pm to SEC. 593
quote:
Not replying to you...
Okay?
Posted on 6/4/18 at 9:06 pm to olgoi khorkhoi
Please change the OP title to: Massive Amount of Ignorance by Nicole Arce Says 90 Percent of Animals Appeared at the Same Time
I love most millennials but every group has its ignorant bitches. Arce may have some smarts but DNA certainly isn't one of them.
Best of the comments for the article:
I love most millennials but every group has its ignorant bitches. Arce may have some smarts but DNA certainly isn't one of them.
Best of the comments for the article:
quote:
This article's headline is hilariously, irresponsibly inaccurate. The authors of this study don't conclude anything resembling the "90% of species appeared within the past 200,000 years" nonsense that this article conjures from thin air. It is effectively concluding that most animals have had a "mitochondrial Eve" in the past 200,000 years (that is, an ancestor from whom all modern individuals of that **already extant** species have inherited their mitochondrial genomes). Don't get your science news from unreliable news sources, folks.
This post was edited on 6/4/18 at 9:08 pm
Posted on 6/4/18 at 9:08 pm to olgoi khorkhoi
Yeah it was like the same week if I remember correctly.
Posted on 6/4/18 at 9:09 pm to Kentucker
quote:
Arce may have some smarts but DNA certainly isn't one of them
She probably knew what she was doing.
Posted on 6/4/18 at 9:11 pm to olgoi khorkhoi
As in, they were made on the same days? Hmmmm, who da thunk
Posted on 6/4/18 at 9:15 pm to Rust Cohle
quote:
Exactly. Bipedal hominids have been around 4.4 million
That figure has been pushed back to 6.7 million years with the discovery of Sahelanthropus tchadensis, or "Toumai" in Chad 10 years ago.
Posted on 6/4/18 at 9:16 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
The study actually says that most species share mitochondrial DNA with a common ancestor within the last "several hundred thousand years" preceding population increases.
Wait.... you mean after the last extinction that most things that survived have a common ancestor?
No.
Way.
Posted on 6/4/18 at 9:16 pm to Jack Daniel
My god you people are dumb 
Posted on 6/4/18 at 9:18 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
She probably knew what she was doing.
Oh, I think you're right. She usually writes sensible articles but, man, she goes off the rails sometimes. This is definitely one of those "your brain on drugs" examples.
Posted on 6/4/18 at 9:19 pm to Jack Daniel
quote:
As in, they were made on the same days? Hmmmm, who da thunk
Not the authors of the study.
Posted on 6/4/18 at 9:20 pm to olgoi khorkhoi
all these test and time wasted.. just read the first chapter of the Bible. The answer has literally been sitting there the whole time
Popular
Back to top



1








