Started By
Message

re: Marines to Shut Down All Tank Units, Cut Infantry Battalions in Major Overhaul

Posted on 3/23/20 at 10:59 pm to
Posted by salty1
Member since Jun 2015
4429 posts
Posted on 3/23/20 at 10:59 pm to
quote:


Do tanks shoot nukes? If not we don’t need them for the fight with China.


Actually, they can.

Posted by TigerFanInSouthland
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
28065 posts
Posted on 3/23/20 at 11:02 pm to
quote:

The largest island the Marines helped take was Okinawa. And even there the force structure was 4 Army divisions and 3 Marine Divisions under the overall command of 10th Army.


That’s not unheard of, that’s the way it was in WWI as well.

quote:

And in the largest land campaign of the Pacific, there wasn’t a single Marine Division involved. The Philippine Campaign saw the US commit 16 Army Divisions under 6th and 8th Army. No Marine divisions took part in the Philippine Campaign.


That’s primarily because the Philippine campaign fell under MacArthur’s command which was an all army command. While the island hopping campaign fell under Nimitz, the Navy chief of the PTO. So it was only natural that the USMC fell under the latter and not the former. Furthermore, I’d venture to say that the MacArthur did not fare as well in that theater as Nimitz did.

quote:

The Battle of Okinawa and the Philippine Campaign represent the two largest land battles of the Pacific. In the larger of the two it was an exclusive US Army force fighting on the ground. In the smaller of the two, the US Army still outnumbered the Marines.



I’m having trouble seeing why that is such a big deal. The USMC even at their height of manpower in WWII was nowhere near what the Army’s was. And that is by design, as you well know, Darth. The USMC wasn’t and isn’t built to have the numbers the Army has. Which is why I said it is a hammer force, built for quick strikes. It’s not built for long sustained battle.

quote:

And let us not forget it was the US Army who fought across North Africa, Italy, and from both north and a south France all the way to central Germany. And if you look at divisional casualty rates you will find that those US Army divisions fighting in Europe suffered higher casualty rates than either Marine or Army divisions fighting in the Pacific. In fact, if memory serves me correct, I believe it was 1st Marine Division that suffered the highest casualty rate of any PTO division, either Army or Marine. However, had that 1st Marine Div fought in the ETO suffering that same casualty number, they’d only rank about 8th on the list.


Again, I don’t see how that’s a slight at the USMC. The Japanese were not the Germans in manpower and technological prowess. The Army could afford the burn rate of the conflict in the ETO. You well know the USMC couldn’t and wasn’t set up for that type of fighting to begin with.

What I’m simply saying is that the USMC is a strike force, it’s a hammer blow designed for quick action. It’s not designed for drawn out battle. It’s the much smaller force so it can’t operate the same way the Army can.
Posted by salty1
Member since Jun 2015
4429 posts
Posted on 3/23/20 at 11:29 pm to
quote:

And let us not forget it was the US Army who fought across North Africa, Italy, and from both north and a south France all the way to central Germany. And if you look at divisional casualty rates you will find that those US Army divisions fighting in Europe suffered higher casualty rates than either Marine or Army divisions fighting in the Pacific. In fact, if memory serves me correct, I believe it was 1st Marine Division that suffered the highest casualty rate of any PTO division, either Army or Marine. However, had that 1st Marine Div fought in the ETO suffering that same casualty number, they’d only rank about 8th on the list.


Here are the numbers. Make of them what you will. The PTO was clearly the bloodiest theater not on the eastern front.

LINK
Posted by AUTimbo
Member since Sep 2011
2868 posts
Posted on 3/23/20 at 11:36 pm to
quote:

and the military had the foresight to divert resources instead of plowing them into an outdated technology simply because it’s what we knew and had in the past.


Damn baw....do you even BUFF?
Posted by Havoc
Member since Nov 2015
28351 posts
Posted on 3/24/20 at 12:14 am to
You fricking hammered that douche.
Posted by Lima Whiskey
Member since Apr 2013
19236 posts
Posted on 3/24/20 at 2:55 am to
Drones won’t work in contested airspace. They’ll get shot down very quickly.

These cuts sound like something Donald Rumsfeld would have come up with.
This post was edited on 3/24/20 at 3:10 am
Posted by JudgeHolden
Gila River
Member since Jan 2008
18566 posts
Posted on 3/24/20 at 3:09 am to
Semper Gumby.
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
65688 posts
Posted on 3/24/20 at 4:44 am to
quote:

I’m sure people thought the same thing when we retired battleships, we will be woefully ill prepared and won’t ever win another war again without them.
Generals (and obviously other idiots^) are always prepared to fight the last war.

LucasP is not a 2020 Battleship proponent.
Posted by geauxtigers6492
Admin in Waiting
Member since Jun 2008
3981 posts
Posted on 3/24/20 at 5:26 am to
quote:

We won't need armor battalions in a face off with China?




Nah, the army got em covered.
Posted by geauxtigers87
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2011
25203 posts
Posted on 3/24/20 at 5:31 am to
You had marine air and marine artillery in the Philippines
Posted by OTIS2
NoLA
Member since Jul 2008
50120 posts
Posted on 3/24/20 at 5:33 am to
You can’t fix stupid
Posted by geauxtigers87
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2011
25203 posts
Posted on 3/24/20 at 5:39 am to
Buckner grossly misused marine assets on Okinawa as well. There were marine reserves just floating around the island when he could have used them in an amphibious assault and landed them on the Japanese flank around Shuri castle and broken their defenses. Another example of army officers dropping the ball. And it ended up getting Buckner killed.
This post was edited on 3/24/20 at 5:41 am
Posted by 0351dawg
West Georgia
Member since Jan 2018
88 posts
Posted on 3/24/20 at 6:52 am to
If you want it done call the Marines! Army ain’t guarding the president.
Posted by fishfighter
RIP
Member since Apr 2008
40026 posts
Posted on 3/24/20 at 6:57 am to
quote:

Those are all terrible ideas


No, it's not. Marines has always been a fighting unit that is to be deploy super fast. First in, last out.
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51274 posts
Posted on 3/24/20 at 6:58 am to
quote:

prepares for a potential face-off with China.


Posted by TigerFanInSouthland
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
28065 posts
Posted on 3/24/20 at 6:59 am to
quote:

You can’t fix stupid


If you’re calling Darth stupid on this matter then I think you’re being a bit unfair.
Posted by OleWarSkuleAlum
Huntsville, AL
Member since Dec 2013
10293 posts
Posted on 3/24/20 at 7:15 am to
quote:

If you’re calling Darth stupid on this matter then I think you’re being a bit unfair.


Darth is stubborn. He’s an Army homer who served for a handful of years, got out as an E-4, and thinks he understands all the intricacies of multi-domain operations.
Posted by DevilDagNS
Member since Dec 2017
2671 posts
Posted on 3/24/20 at 7:21 am to
Having tanks on hand in Iraq was like having the cheat codes on doom. The only further escalation from there was calling in air. That being said, a war with China or Russia will be fought with missiles, economics and cyber attacks. Getting rid of tanks is fine for those threats, but should still keep some on hand for traditional shite hole country drama.

From a numbers standpoint, for the last 30 years the USMC has always fluctuated between 175K and 200K. When we had the surge during OIF/OEF we broke 200K for a few years.
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 3/24/20 at 7:24 am to
quote:

using the Navy to fill fire support.


The navy isnt really built for shore bombardments anymore, is it? I know they pack lots of missiles these days but isnt this the whole reason for a battleship?
Posted by TigerFanInSouthland
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
28065 posts
Posted on 3/24/20 at 7:29 am to
quote:

Darth is stubborn. He’s an Army homer who served for a handful of years, got out as an E-4, and thinks he understands all the intricacies of multi-domain operations.


I mean, I’m a USMC homer. It comes with the territory, nothing wrong with it.

It’s a bit disingenuous to say that about Darth. Sure he’s not a field grade officer; but if I had a question about military history, he’d be one of the first people I’d turn to on this site.

He is stubborn though.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram