Started By
Message

re: Louisiana Supreme Court letting Eboni Johnson Rose off with slap on the wrist

Posted on 4/23/25 at 6:19 pm to
Posted by Demshoes
Up in here
Member since Aug 2015
10683 posts
Posted on 4/23/25 at 6:19 pm to
It's really disheartening to have to practice law in front of judges who are clearly incompetent and it's even worse for clients. Makes me not want to practice.
Posted by Stexas
SWLA
Member since May 2013
6844 posts
Posted on 4/23/25 at 6:35 pm to
quote:

I loathe that we elect judges in this state

So you’d prefer that they’d be appointed by the governor or Supreme Court? No thanks, we’d have a bench full of the highest bidder without a doubt.
Posted by TheSadvocate
North Shore
Member since Aug 2020
4638 posts
Posted on 4/23/25 at 6:37 pm to
quote:

If I found out that my judge’s name was fricking Eboni I’m requesting a retrial



I wouldn't care about her name. If I found out my judge was on probation for making up charges like "Misdemeanor Malfeasance" I'd ask for a god damn mistrial. How the HELL do you make up fake charges in a district court and retain your seat? Every single case she hears should ask for a motion to disqualify simply because this woman has a record of making up fake charges.
This post was edited on 4/23/25 at 6:55 pm
Posted by deltadummy
Member since Mar 2025
1559 posts
Posted on 4/23/25 at 7:10 pm to
quote:

Read Cole's concurrence. He basically threw up his hands and said the only people being sanctioned were taxpayers but he was concurring because if it dragged out, her paid vacation would be longer.


Why not drag it out longer and inform the public about it? It's not a billion dollars.

She should absolutely be removed. I know Louisiana is a bit different in politics, but this is absurd.
Posted by LeGrosChat
Bangladesh
Member since Feb 2016
594 posts
Posted on 4/23/25 at 8:21 pm to
Lawyers regulating lawyers =
Foxes guarding the Hen House!!

Wow, that is so lame of the Supreme Court Justices and a complete lack of fiduciary concern for taxpayer money. Or else, they are incompetent as she is and lacking in discipline.
Posted by supadave3
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2005
31794 posts
Posted on 4/23/25 at 8:24 pm to
It disgust me that our lives could be in the hands of a dumb, moody, racist, arrogant bitch like her.

Terrifying actually.
This post was edited on 4/24/25 at 6:53 am
Posted by MintBerry Crunch
Member since Nov 2010
5822 posts
Posted on 4/23/25 at 8:40 pm to
quote:

3rd Cade Cole Republican Tulane


Wildly disappointed in Cade Cole's vote here.
Posted by TankBoys32
Member since Mar 2019
3991 posts
Posted on 4/23/25 at 9:10 pm to
What a stupid thing to say. Even if 90% of graduates that went there might be bums, not one has ever been qualified to a be a judge?
Posted by redstickrick
Laffy, La
Member since May 2019
428 posts
Posted on 4/23/25 at 11:53 pm to
quote:

Wildly disappointed in Cade Cole's vote here.


Why? The LASC cannot just come up with their own discipline at this stage in the proceeding because this was on a consent judgment- not a full recommendation. Recommendation of punishment must be meted out by Judiciary Commission and then approved by LASC. If he voted no, then they would have gone back to a full hearing at the commission, followed by an appeal to the LASC, likely another 8 months to a year.
Posted by brewhan davey
Audubon Place
Member since Sep 2010
33287 posts
Posted on 4/24/25 at 4:47 am to
quote:

So you’d prefer that they’d be appointed by the governor or Supreme Court? No thanks, we’d have a bench full of the highest bidder without a doubt.


Read the rest of my post.

But to further answer your question—I don’t think there is a perfect solution. However, there needs to be some type of vetting process in place for judges. The voting public typically is not going to know enough about any particular candidate’s legal acumen.

Currently, the only qualification criteria for judicial candidates is that they have to live in the district in which they are running and must have practiced law for 8 years (10 years for the courts of appeal and the Supreme Court). So if you meet those bare minimum qualifications and can win a popularity contest, you can sit in judgment over legal cases regardless of your actual legal experience.
Posted by Will Cover
Davidson, NC
Member since Mar 2007
39892 posts
Posted on 4/24/25 at 6:02 am to
quote:

the 19th JDC is a complete dumpster fire


Over 3.5 years ago, my older, evil, and manipulative sister changed my mom’s will and power of attorney to allow her to become sole recipient and “provider” after her dementia diagnosis.

In that time, my mother has been living by herself (she now has late stage dementia), locked herself out of the house, broken glass windows, and finally was committed to a behavioral health center after I called the police and she could not orient herself. She finally has 24/7 care, although she recently was recommitted to a behavioral health hospital due to violent encounters with her caregivers. My mother has been basically regulated to die inside her home as she gets nothing but frozen dinners, processed foods, and has zero socialization or interactions with anyone when she used to be a social butterfly.

I have been the 19th JDC this entire time, and when I say it is an absolute joke of a”justice” I speak from experience. Nothing, and I mean, nothing has been done in terms of an interdiction. There are multiple Elderly Protective Service cases filed against my sister, including fraud, and when I say EPS provides no updates, I mean it. The whole system is flawed and broken.
Posted by Tarps99
Lafourche Parish
Member since Apr 2017
11534 posts
Posted on 4/24/25 at 6:08 am to
quote:

I loathe that we elect judges in this state, but if we're going to stick with that process for our judiciary, we should at least expand the elections so that they aren't limited to a candidate's particular district. This is especially true for supreme court justices; they make decisions that impact the law in the entire state, yet only those who reside in a candidate's district can vote for that justice. Also, if we are going to stick with judicial elections, we must change the current law that exempts judges from recall (judges are the only elected officials in the state who are statutorily exempt from recall).



Bring back at large voting. Get rid of all minority sub districts in judicial districts.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
119934 posts
Posted on 4/24/25 at 6:48 am to
You should see urban courts in Texas. To be fair, Texas is doing something about it. The state has created business courts to take high dollar commercial cases from these judges and the legislature is looking at a massive pay hike to attract better candidates.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
119934 posts
Posted on 4/24/25 at 6:49 am to
quote:

Highest bidder


Would be a massive improvement for Louisiana
Posted by lsuson
Metairie
Member since Oct 2013
15017 posts
Posted on 4/24/25 at 6:55 am to
It’s a fricking joke
Posted by Gris Gris
OTIS!NO RULES FOR SAUCES ON STEAK!!
Member since Feb 2008
49636 posts
Posted on 4/24/25 at 9:32 am to
How much of her term is left? Hopefully, she won't be re-elected. This is truly terrible.
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
46611 posts
Posted on 4/24/25 at 9:38 am to
the elected term for state civil districts is six years. She was elected in Dec 2020. Next election will be Dec 2026

she will be re-elected in a landslide LOL
Posted by oleheat
Sportsman's Paradise
Member since Mar 2007
14540 posts
Posted on 4/24/25 at 9:40 am to
She is a great example of the moron electorate.
Posted by Corinthians420
Iowa
Member since Jun 2022
16104 posts
Posted on 4/24/25 at 9:45 am to
quote:

was 4-3 and it was a consent discipline.

McCallum's dissent laid it out perfectly. She got a 9 month paid vacation plus a $15k bonus

Yep.. This is straight bullshite.

She should have never have been paid and she should lose her job
Posted by brewhan davey
Audubon Place
Member since Sep 2010
33287 posts
Posted on 4/24/25 at 9:48 am to
quote:

Bring back at large voting. Get rid of all minority sub districts in judicial districts.


Amen. Even district court judges make rulings that can affect the entire state. It is totally ridiculous why judicial elections are run like legislative elections. Judges don't "represent" the people of their districts; their duty is to interpret the law in an impartial manner.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram