- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/1/25 at 4:07 am to TBoy
quote:
Mom is the stem winder here. She ordered the meds and gave them to the
Yes I'm wondering if the mom defrauded the doctor.
Posted on 2/1/25 at 4:14 am to TBoy
Wrong. First a physician should have evaluated the patient and you can’t do that over the phone especially on a drug like that. Second the doctor knew the pill was going to a state where abortion is illegal.
The mother is just as responsible.Both have been charged and for good reason.
The mother is just as responsible.Both have been charged and for good reason.
Posted on 2/1/25 at 4:42 am to TrueTiger
quote:
Yes I'm wondering if the mom defrauded the doctor.
Sounds like it but it doesn’t change the outcome. The doc violated the law.
Posted on 2/1/25 at 6:30 am to spslayto
So much for choice, huh mom and Dr. Death? frick them, and God bless the dead baby. Btw, it's not that the "pregnancy was terminated." The baby died.
Posted on 2/1/25 at 6:36 am to spslayto
Excellent, looking forward to locking her up in Angola.
Posted on 2/1/25 at 6:38 am to Geauxldilocks
I am just not sure I believe these ‘cases’ are not orchestrated for the political theatre and fund raising.
How is either side of this furthering a productive society?
How is either side of this furthering a productive society?
Posted on 2/1/25 at 7:34 am to FightinTigersDammit
quote:
Pro-"choice" advocates are all in favor of abortions anywhere, anytime.
It will be interesting to see the pro choice people side with. The mother who forced her daughter to take the pill. Or the daughter who wanted the baby. Seems like the daughter didn’t have a choice in the matter.
Posted on 2/1/25 at 7:36 am to JOJO Hammer
The pro-choice crew will side with whatever results in a dead baby.
Posted on 2/1/25 at 7:51 am to idlewatcher
quote:
The doc violated the law.
Not in New York
Why do we have such a hard time understanding jurisdiction?
This post was edited on 2/1/25 at 7:52 am
Posted on 2/1/25 at 7:54 am to spslayto
Yay! More welfare babies for Republicans to hate!
Posted on 2/1/25 at 8:09 am to chalmetteowl
quote:
Not in New York
Why do we have such a hard time understanding jurisdiction?
Yeah the doctor innocent… what people expect to happen when abortion illegal in some states… someone of more means financially probably would have went to New York to have it done… those who can’t afford it will use the mail… who couldn’t see this coming???
Posted on 2/1/25 at 8:17 am to lepdagod
quote:
what people expect to happen when abortion illegal in some states
Everyone thinks of abortions as doctors butchering with a scalpel but it’s 2025 now… we need to catch up if you can just take a pill now. Hard to stop that
Posted on 2/1/25 at 8:43 am to Scruffy
quote:
The doctor probably prescribed it to the mother, not the daughter
They should both be in trouble for their part in it however they have way different laws broken
In order for the doctor to prescribe it to the mother, the mother would have had to physically be in NY or somewhere abortion is legal at the time of the doctor visit, even if it was a virtual visit.
If she was in LA then the doctor was possibly not licensed in LA or prescribing drugs and practicing medicine that isn’t legal in LA
Another question is did he require the mother to have a positive pregnancy test before prescribing? If she faked one then it would be less severe for the doctor I would think
Posted on 2/1/25 at 11:28 am to chalmetteowl
quote:
The doc violated the law.
Not in New York
Why do we have such a hard time understanding jurisdiction?
Bless your heart. You are the one who doesn’t understand jurisdiction and you don’t even realize it.
I didn’t read the article, so correct me where I’m likely wrong. But doctors don’t typically fill prescriptions, they write them. Did this doctor literally mail a pill from New York to Louisiana? Because that would violate both Louisiana law and federal law. If she merely wrote a prescription like she would via Telehealth and texted a pic of it to the mom who could have been using a VPN and/or app indicating she had a New York phone number, does that get the doctor off the hook? I don’t know anything about Telehealth—do those doctors have to call in prescriptions to the pharmacies they are to be filled at or do text/email/fax copies suffice?
I mean if the doctor had a sample pill at her office and willingly and knowingly mailed it to somebody in Louisiana, she’s fricked. There is zero chance that after Roe was overturned that every doctor in that field wasn’t thoroughly briefed on proper protocol. And even if they weren’t, they’re too smart not to proactively read up on it to protect themselves. Ignorance is no defense and they know that.
But it’s the online thing that could be slippery. How much due diligence is required to make sure you are sending a script to a person actually in a state where it’s still legal? I’m curious about the answers to these questions even if this particular case doesn’t fit them.
Posted on 2/1/25 at 11:35 am to Hot Carl
democrats love to kill babies
Posted on 2/1/25 at 11:35 am to chalmetteowl
quote:
Not in New York
Why do we have such a hard time understanding jurisdiction?
She's not being charged with violating NY law.
Why do we have such a hard time understanding where defendants are being charged?
Posted on 2/1/25 at 11:35 am to chalmetteowl
quote:
Why do we have such a hard time understanding jurisdiction?
Posted on 2/1/25 at 11:39 am to chalmetteowl
quote:
How are we charging a doctor who never had to set foot in LA to do what she did
If I mailed a bomb to California the locals could prosecute me even though I've never been there.
Posted on 2/1/25 at 11:45 am to chalmetteowl
quote:
chalmetteowl
Bruh.
Popular
Back to top


1






