Started By
Message

re: Looks like Landry is going to tank the mid-Barataria diversion.

Posted on 2/29/24 at 1:06 pm to
Posted by TigerDat
Member since Aug 2010
7629 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

This guy also fricked up lower Terrebonne.


Correction. All of Terrebonne
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37106 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

How much storm surge does the diversion reduce?


At the point of the coast... zero.

But more land will stop the surge from spreading further inland.

The bigger keys to fighting storm surge are to build higher and to keep surge out of the rivers and lakes via man-made barriers.
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
146214 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

How much storm surge does the diversion reduce?

about 1 foot if I'm not mistaken
Posted by Marshhen
Port Eads
Member since Nov 2018
640 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

about 1 foot if I'm not mistaken


Thanks. Do you know what area that is for? New Orleans or just in Plaquemines?
Posted by Slippy
Across the rivah
Member since Aug 2005
6583 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

Thanks. Do you know what area that is for? New Orleans or just in Plaquemines?


The whole Barataria basin, including protection of the westbank of New Orleans.
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
146214 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

Thanks. Do you know what area that is for? New Orleans or just in Plaquemines?



I would just assume it depends on where the storm makes landfall
Posted by Basura Blanco
Member since Dec 2011
8160 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

Mother Nature always wins


Explain ~100 years of levees then. This entire issue only exists due to man made levees. Mother Nature is getting her arse kicked as it pertains to saltwater intrusion and loss of coastal wetlands.

Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
23721 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

I guess Jeff Landry is the owner of Louisiana now. Kiss the ring or die.


What a shite take, but not surprising from Low Tboy


Not a bad take. Why does one farking guy get to derail a massive project that is critical to preserve the communities along the southern coast of an entire state? Who appointed him king-god? He should stay the fark out of it.

I fish down there all the time. I love close salty water. But the speed of the present erosion is destroying the marshes and the coastal estuaries.
This post was edited on 2/29/24 at 1:26 pm
Posted by UnitedFruitCompany
Bay Area
Member since Nov 2018
3380 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

it is a shame how entire teams of university professors, grad students, and engineering firms have true complete scientific evidence stating how devastating this threat is and then you have a bunch of these arse clowns in office (who quite frankly have no earthly idea what they are talking about) ruin all of it.


This has been covered before.




If you've read that book you know.
Posted by frequent flyer
USA
Member since Jul 2021
2985 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 1:28 pm to
This is fricking stupid.

Dammit Landry.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37106 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

Who appointed him king-god?


Blame Huey P Long
Posted by LakeviewYakker
NOLA
Member since Aug 2014
359 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

I'm talking about knuckleheads.

There are fishermen etc who would be thrilled with the prospect of catching reds closer to home.

Yes, they are dumb as a pile of bricks.


What the same knuckleheads don't realize is when that marsh goes so do the redfish, trout, shrimp, crabs and everything else that depends on that land and marsh for a nursery.
There won't be fish to catch closer to home, at least not in the populations that we're accustomed to.
Posted by lion
Member since Aug 2016
765 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

Explain ~100 years of levees then. This entire issue only exists due to man made levees. Mother Nature is getting her arse kicked as it pertains to saltwater intrusion and loss of coastal wetlands.
Weve lost the bottom part of our state because we thought we control everything. Then make a spillway here, a pass there, etc. We’ve clearly lost.

We’ve resorted to dumping goddamn Christmas trees out there. It’s pointless.
This post was edited on 2/29/24 at 3:15 pm
Posted by lsuson
Metairie
Member since Oct 2013
12193 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 3:21 pm to
Doesn’t matter what Landry decides. The erosion will not stop and a people down there that are complaining that it will ruin their way of life won’t have much of a life once water is in their yard.
Posted by Marshhen
Port Eads
Member since Nov 2018
640 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

The whole Barataria basin, including protection of the westbank of New Orleans.


Are you sure about that? I find it hard to believe that it would protect the entire basin… Do you have any links? Thanks.
Posted by ChatGPT of LA
Member since Mar 2023
307 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 3:32 pm to
Love all the comments from those who aren't affected by the diversion. The main problem with S Louisiana is erosion happening because of diversion we should let nature be nature and adjust our lives. If so, coast would be much much more sound and extended
Posted by Tree_Fall
Member since Mar 2021
489 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 3:45 pm to
quote:

So I'm guessing the $3B will go to dredging companies, barging/trucking companies, and pipeline construction companies as we will start trying to dredge the dirt out of the river, and barge / truck / pipe it to try to build land elsewhere


Perfectly reasonable answer, but the settlement allows for "economic restoration". MS has used some BP money for a Coastal Coliseum and a fairgrounds revamp.

Maybe Louisiana can use the diversion money for both a new LSU area and a new River Center area?
Posted by Motorboat
At the camp
Member since Oct 2007
22685 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

This has been covered before.




If you've read that book you know.


I've read that book 3 or 4 times. what a great read.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37106 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

Perfectly reasonable answer, but the settlement allows for "economic restoration". MS has used some BP money for a Coastal Coliseum and a fairgrounds revamp.

Maybe Louisiana can use the diversion money for both a new LSU area and a new River Center area?


I would hope it would be at least used towards areas that suffered from the disaster. Not sure how much we can say LSU and downtown BR suffered.
Posted by Purple Spoon
Hoth
Member since Feb 2005
17838 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 4:01 pm to
quote:

happening because of diversion we should let nature be nature and adjust our lives.



I agree. Light up all the levees and let the river take its course.



first pageprev pagePage 5 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram