Started By
Message

re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Posted on 2/25/22 at 8:50 am to
Posted by CapstoneGrad06
Little Rock
Member since Nov 2008
73370 posts
Posted on 2/25/22 at 8:50 am to
I hope that’s fake.

They’re more than welcome to find a way to Ukraine and throw rock at an invading Russian force.
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
61475 posts
Posted on 2/25/22 at 8:50 am to
quote:

The sad thing is that if we hadn’t expanded NATO, Putin would have tirelessly devoted himself to world peace and the brotherhood of man.


Tulsi Gabbard in the house!
This post was edited on 2/25/22 at 8:54 am
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
60069 posts
Posted on 2/25/22 at 8:50 am to
SIAP...Russian tank crushes another vehicle

LINK
Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
127361 posts
Posted on 2/25/22 at 8:51 am to
quote:

Warfox
To add to your post. The precursor to much of this current crisis;

NATO Bucharest Summit Declaration - 2-4 April 2008
quote:

23. NATO welcomes Ukraine’s and Georgia’s Euro-Atlantic aspirations for membership in NATO. We agreed today that these countries will become members of NATO. Both nations have made valuable contributions to Alliance operations. We welcome the democratic reforms in Ukraine and Georgia and look forward to free and fair parliamentary elections in Georgia in May. MAP is the next step for Ukraine and Georgia on their direct way to membership. Today we make clear that we support these countries’ applications for MAP. Therefore we will now begin a period of intensive engagement with both at a high political level to address the questions still outstanding pertaining to their MAP applications. We have asked Foreign Ministers to make a first assessment of progress at their December 2008 meeting. Foreign Ministers have the authority to decide on the MAP applications of Ukraine and Georgia.
Text of Putin’s speech at NATO Summit (Bucharest, April 2, 2008)
quote:

But in Ukraine, one third are ethnic Russians. Out of forty five million people, in line with the official census, seventeen millions are Russians. There are regions, where only the Russian population lives, for instance, in the Crimea. 90% are Russians. Generally speaking, Ukraine is a very complicated state. Ukraine, in the form it currently exists, was created in the Soviet times, it received its territories from Poland – after the Second World war, from Czechoslovakia, from Romania – and at present not all the problems have been solved as yet in the border region with Romania in the Black Sea. Then, it received huge territories from Russia in the east and south of the country. It is a complicated state formation. If we introduce into it NATO problems, other problems, it may put the state on the verge of its existence. Complicated internal political problems are taking place there. We should act also very-very carefully. We do not have any right to veto, and, probably, we do not pretend to have. But I want that all of us, when deciding such issues, realize that we have there our interests as well. Well, seventeen million Russians currently live in Ukraine. Who may state that we do not have any interests there? South, the south of Ukraine, completely, there are only Russians.
Posted by Roll Tide Ravens
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2015
51688 posts
Posted on 2/25/22 at 8:52 am to
quote:

SIAP...Russian tank crushes another vehicle


My goodness, that is horrific.
Posted by OGtigerfan87
North La
Member since Feb 2019
3948 posts
Posted on 2/25/22 at 8:53 am to
You are one crazy Putin fan boy lol. Literally everything you post is absolute bull and almost the opposite of reality. Starting to think it’s just a troll job
Posted by LilWezyAna
BR
Member since Feb 2016
3187 posts
Posted on 2/25/22 at 8:54 am to
quote:

SIAP...Russian tank crushes another vehicle

The guy survived and was relatively stable. That’s absurd
Posted by DabosDynasty
Member since Apr 2017
5180 posts
Posted on 2/25/22 at 8:55 am to
quote:

Oh yea I'm sure Putin was shaking in his boots that Georgia (backed by us of course) was going to invade Russia first and had no choice but to invade preemptively instead. It couldn't have been an opportunistic land grab in the name of empire, not at all.


It’s not about Georgia invading, it’s about us putting American boots, equipment, planes in yet another bordering nation. Why is this so hard to understand? Would you feel great if Mexico started allowing Russian troops, equipment, planes, and the like there? How about China? But to make it worse our goal has been the equivalent of Russia and China in BOTH Mexico and Canada. Maybe some back in Cuba.

Now think about how we reacted over just Cuba in the 60s.
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
61475 posts
Posted on 2/25/22 at 8:57 am to
quote:

SIAP...Russian tank crushes another vehicle


holy frick I really wish I hadn't started the day watching somebody get straight up murdered.


*edit* hoping reports that the driver survived are true.
This post was edited on 2/25/22 at 8:58 am
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
38158 posts
Posted on 2/25/22 at 8:59 am to
quote:

Would you feel great if Mexico started allowing Russian troops, equipment, planes, and the like there?


I was waiting for this stupid fricking analogy to rear its head. A far more appropriate one would be, what if we had a history of unilaterally invading and conquering Latin American countries, those countries formed a mutual defense alliance in light of that history, mexico wanted to join that alliance, and then we claimed we felt “threatened” and invaded it preemptively.
This post was edited on 2/25/22 at 9:00 am
Posted by theGarnetWay
Washington, D.C.
Member since Mar 2010
27402 posts
Posted on 2/25/22 at 8:59 am to
quote:


Now think about how we reacted over just Cuba in the 60s.


You're really comparing Cuba, at the height of the Cold War, with Georgia in 2008? As if those are even close to the same circumstances.
Posted by LilWezyAna
BR
Member since Feb 2016
3187 posts
Posted on 2/25/22 at 8:59 am to
quote:

hoping reports that the driver survived are true

The video in the reply to that tweet is a bunch of Ukrainians pulling a man out of a completely smushed car and he looks awake and fine

I’m aware that it makes completely zero sense as he was in a car crushed by a fricking tank.
This post was edited on 2/25/22 at 9:01 am
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
61475 posts
Posted on 2/25/22 at 9:00 am to
quote:

The video in the reply to that tweet is a bunch of Ukrainians pulling a man out of a completely smushed car and he looks awake and fine




thanks much

I didn't even want to scroll down after that b/c I assumed it would just be more videos of people getting killed.
Posted by DabosDynasty
Member since Apr 2017
5180 posts
Posted on 2/25/22 at 9:01 am to
quote:

You are one crazy Putin fan boy lol. Literally everything you post is absolute bull and almost the opposite of reality. Starting to think it’s just a troll job


No, I just have sense enough to see how we’ve instigated what’s happened knowing Russia’s historic interests, actions, and how they’d feel being surrounded by American and European troops after losing the Cold War.
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
134600 posts
Posted on 2/25/22 at 9:01 am to
quote:

The guy survived and was relatively stable. That’s absurd


Now that is a surprise. Lucky dude
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87305 posts
Posted on 2/25/22 at 9:03 am to
quote:

No, I just have sense enough to see how we’ve instigated what’s happened knowing Russia’s historic interests, actions, and how they’d feel being surrounded by American and European troops after losing the Cold War.



The mandate for this in Russia is probably halfhearted majority support at best

What we're really saying here is "our actions stimulated the wild fears and apprehensions of an authoritarian, narcissist strongman."
Posted by DabosDynasty
Member since Apr 2017
5180 posts
Posted on 2/25/22 at 9:04 am to
quote:

I was waiting for this stupid fricking analogy to rear its head. A far more appropriate one would be, what if we had a history of unilaterally invading and conquering Latin American countries, those countries formed a mutual defense alliance in light of that history, mexico wanted to join that alliance, and then we claimed we felt “threatened” and invaded it preemptively.




I suppose we’re going to ignore the Mexican-American war and US meddling in Latin America in the late 1800s-1900s?
Posted by Bobby OG Johnson
Member since Apr 2015
33480 posts
Posted on 2/25/22 at 9:04 am to
Air raid sirens going off in Kyiv
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
134600 posts
Posted on 2/25/22 at 9:05 am to


quote:

what if we had a history of unilaterally invading and conquering Latin American countries,



Posted by DabosDynasty
Member since Apr 2017
5180 posts
Posted on 2/25/22 at 9:07 am to
quote:

You're really comparing Cuba, at the height of the Cold War, with Georgia in 2008? As if those are even close to the same circumstances.


You’re right because where we reasonably could defend against the Russians in Cuba then with relative parity, or our advantage, militarily in the 60s, by 2008 we held such a military advantage over the Russians being in Georgia meant they’d have a significantly more powerful enemy surrounding them vs an equal to slight inferior.
Jump to page
Page First 81 82 83 84 85 ... 5046
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 83 of 5046Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram