Started By
Message

re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Posted on 4/10/22 at 9:18 am to
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
99368 posts
Posted on 4/10/22 at 9:18 am to
Thanks stalker
Posted by Esquire
Chiraq
Member since Apr 2014
15161 posts
Posted on 4/10/22 at 9:21 am to
quote:

Thanks stalker


You’re the one that said you have a signal for when I post. Why do you always project so much when you can’t think of anything clever?
This post was edited on 4/10/22 at 9:25 am
Posted by Sooner5030
Desert Southwest
Member since Sep 2014
1740 posts
Posted on 4/10/22 at 9:22 am to
Allegedly the large russian convoy north east of Izyum has been attacked by Ukrainian forces. Given the sources I'd wait to see pictures/vids before deciding how severe the losses might have been. Could've been small irregular squads taking out one or two vehicles.

But it does demonstrate how vulnerable Russian forces are when they get canalized on the roads.

OSINT UK Tweet

Livemap Tweet

Nexta Tweet

Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
38341 posts
Posted on 4/10/22 at 9:22 am to
quote:

This thread is fascinating. You, a fricking clown having never participated in war, wish to dunk on the family of dead men over their death because you gain political points. What the frick is wrong with you?


First of all, I was being facetious because dr90210 doesn’t merit serious responses. Do you seriously think he gives a frick about that dead guy? Second; he was some corrupt russian collaborator involved in treason against his country (allegedly), and didn’t die in combat. It’s like mocking someone in Vichy France. Third, why do we need to be veterans to hope russian troops, who are participating in all sorts of documented atrocities, are killed ?
This post was edited on 4/10/22 at 9:25 am
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
150782 posts
Posted on 4/10/22 at 9:28 am to
quote:

Day 46 of my 3 day war. Ukraine is on fast track to join EU while Sweden & Finland are poised to join NATO.

I remain a master strategist.

impossible, greenwald retweeted this maps weeks ago

Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
99368 posts
Posted on 4/10/22 at 9:32 am to
quote:

You’re the one that said you have a signal for when I post.


No your bat signal is when a DWAC thread is posted
And you prove me right every time
Not surprising you didnt catch on to that groomer
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
38341 posts
Posted on 4/10/22 at 9:32 am to
Greenwald thinks we need to take our moral and policy cues from Saudi Arabia, apparently. The amount of sophistry he engages in to “get” the United States is truly breathtaking. It’s also worthwhile to point out that at least half the grey countries in that map voted to condemn Russia at the UN.
This post was edited on 4/10/22 at 9:44 am
Posted by Esquire
Chiraq
Member since Apr 2014
15161 posts
Posted on 4/10/22 at 9:34 am to
quote:

Not surprising you didnt catch on to that groomer


More projection

Luckily for the kids in your area you don’t leave your basement
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
99368 posts
Posted on 4/10/22 at 9:36 am to
You are so awful at this
Posted by Esquire
Chiraq
Member since Apr 2014
15161 posts
Posted on 4/10/22 at 9:42 am to
quote:

You are so awful at this

Posted by wutangfinancial
Treasure Valley
Member since Sep 2015
11973 posts
Posted on 4/10/22 at 9:50 am to
Would be cool to see an updated map with commodities and supply chain overlaps.
Posted by LSUCanFAN
In the past
Member since Jan 2009
28100 posts
Posted on 4/10/22 at 10:07 am to
I’m seeing some very interesting numbers related to two Russian convoys struck over night. If you check my old posts I made mention of how some materials delivered would change calculations. There is a reason why Russian Soldiers aren’t waking up this morning. I’m also interested in Germany who isn’t part of the Eyes project are somehow the ones doing the cell phone radio intercepts.
Posted by Tigris
Cloud Cuckoo Land
Member since Jul 2005
13197 posts
Posted on 4/10/22 at 10:30 am to
quote:

Britain is supplying Ukraine with anti-ship missiles. I'm guessing Britain is not as concerned now about threats of retaliation by Russia.


Britain knows this topic well, after losing the destroyer Sheffield during the Falklands war to an Exocet missile that France sold to Argentina. 20 sailors were killed, 26 wounded. England did not retaliate against France, but then again the missile was supplied well before the war. I'd imagine that anti-ship missiles have improved a great deal since the Falklands and the British supplied missiles will keep the Russian ships well off the coast. Hopefully they will also keep the Russians from bringing in supplies by ship. One thing I did not know about the evacuation from the Sheffield:

quote:

As Sheffield's crew departed in Arrow, Sub-lieutenant Carrington-Wood led the crew in singing "Always Look on the Bright Side of Life" from Monty Python's Life of Brian.


Just listening to some interesting discussion about what happens if Russia uses a tactical nuke out of desperation. There was speculation that we may make the Russian Black Sea fleet disappear as a way to retaliate without going nuclear.
Posted by Lakeboy7
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2011
28324 posts
Posted on 4/10/22 at 10:47 am to
quote:

A Nato-supplied anti-ship missile fired by Ukrainian forces in Odesa hits and sinks a Russian warship


Already happened
Posted by aTmTexas Dillo
East Texas Lake
Member since Sep 2018
24472 posts
Posted on 4/10/22 at 10:52 am to
I was aware that the British ship was sunk by Argentina using a French anti-ship missile. Russia has pretty much assumed they would have their way with Ukraine in the East and eventually would take he whole of eastern Ukraine cutting them off from a sea port and the Black Sea. I also heard a retired US military type say the west needed to do everything possible short of participating to keep Russia from taking Odesa and cutting Ukraine off from the sea. To do so would severely hurt Ukraine as a complete country no longer being able to trade from the sea.
My guess is Britain in supplying these missiles will prevent this. I expect Russia to lose ships and marines if they try to take Odesa via amphibious assault.

I also read an article that stated Ukraine is essentially part of NATO now without NATO saying so. They are receiving NATO standard equipment from the west including 155mm heavy artillery. If Ukraine pulls this off, they will be the boss country of the world for at least a few months.

Ukraine might as well be NATO
This post was edited on 4/10/22 at 11:37 am
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
46635 posts
Posted on 4/10/22 at 10:54 am to
quote:

I also read an article that stated Ukraine is essentially part of NATO now without NATO saying so


More or less. We've been training with them for over 20 years now.

Exercise Rapid Trident.
Posted by Lakeboy7
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2011
28324 posts
Posted on 4/10/22 at 10:56 am to
quote:

a French anti-ship missile


Exocet
Posted by BRIllini07
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2015
3211 posts
Posted on 4/10/22 at 10:59 am to
The supply line from Poland to Eastern Ukraine is long, and mud means the roads themselves have to remain in tact for the supply lines to work.

As of now it looks like Ukraine has enough air defenses left to prevent Russia from using regular bomber missions to supply roads and railways, with Russia still preferring to launch missiles from their own territory.

The MANPADS seem to be making a difference in preventing traditional air superiority, causing Russia to be a little more risk averse with their sorties.
Posted by Lakeboy7
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2011
28324 posts
Posted on 4/10/22 at 11:11 am to
quote:

The supply line from Poland to Eastern Ukraine is long, and mud means the roads themselves have to remain in tact for the supply lines to work.



The bigger convoys run from Poland , Latvia and Romania to the Dnieper with no issues. There is a good open source article how they then break down what is brought in to what the forward units need, smaller groups of private vehicles then take the specialized orders to the frontline units.
Posted by northshorebamaman
Mackinac Island
Member since Jul 2009
38502 posts
Posted on 4/10/22 at 11:14 am to
quote:

There is a good open source article how they then break down what is brought in to what the forward units need, smaller groups of private vehicles then take the specialized orders to the frontline units.
:wellwe'rewaiting:
Jump to page
Page First 796 797 798 799 800 ... 5046
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 798 of 5046Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram